Côte d'Ivoire: Land rights and practices and intrafamily relations - Conceptual and methodological foundations of a comprehensive approach;Côte d'Ivoire: Droits et pratiques fonciers et relations intrafamiliales - Les bases conceptuelles et méthodologiques d'une approche compréhensive

Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives

Volumn , Issue 2, 2004, Pages 54-66

  Colin, J P ^a  

^a UMR MOISA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISPUTE RESOLUTION; LAND RIGHTS; LANDOWNERSHIP; PROPERTY RIGHTS;

AFRICA; COTE D'IVOIRE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; WEST AFRICA; WORLD;

EID: 14344253310     PISSN: 02511894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, J. 1993. Institutions and economic development: structure, process, and incentive. Dans M. Tool (éd.). Institutional economics: theory, method, policy, p. 245-269. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, Etats-Unis.
2. Agarwal, B. 1994. A field of one's own. Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Royaume-Uni.
3. Ancey, G. 1975. Niveaux de décision et fonctions objectif en milieu rural africain. Note AMIRA 3.
4. Banque mondiale. 2003. Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. A World Bank Policy Research Report, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Royaume-Uni.
5. Berry, S. 1993. No condition is permanent. The social dynamics of agrarian change in sub-Saharan Africa. The University Press of Wisconsin, Madison, Etats-Unis.
6. Bromley, D. 1989. Economic interests and institutions. The conceptual foundations of public policy. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, Royaume-Uni.
7. Bruce, J. et Migot-Adholla, S., éds. 1994. Searching for land tenure security In Africa. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa, Etats-Unis.
8. Carter M. et Katz, E. 1997. Separate spheres and the conjugal contract: understanding the impact of bender-biased development. Dans L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott et H. Alderman (éds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries. Models, methods, and policy p. 95-111. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, Etats-Unis.
9. Colin, J.-Ph. 2002. Contrats agraires ou conventions agraires? Economie rurale, 272: 1-17.
10. Colin, J.-Ph. 2003a. Emergence, forme et dynamique des marchés fonciers dans un contexte africain. Une perspective locale (Djimini-Koffikro, Côte d'Ivoire). IRD, document de travail de l'UR 095.
11. e réunion de The African Studies Association, 30 octobre-2 novembre 2003 (avec la collaboration de G. Kouamé et D. Soro).
12. Commons, J.R. 1934. Institutional economics. New York, Etats-Unis, Macmillan.
13. De Janvry A., Gordillo, G., Platteau, J.-Ph. et Sadoulet, E., éds. 2001. Access to land, rural poverty and public action. Oxford University Press, Oxford, Royaume-Uni.
14. Demsetz, H. 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 57: 347-359.
15. Dey Abbas, J. 1997. Gender asymmetries in intrahousehold resource allocation in sub-Saharan Africa: some policy implications for land and labor productivity. Dans L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott et H. Alderman (éds). (Op. cit.), p. 249-262.
16. Dupuy, J.-P., Eymard-Duvernay, F., Favereau, O., Orléan, A., Salais, R. et Thévenot, L. 1989. Introduction, Revue Economique 2: 141-145.
17. Eggertsson, T. 1990. Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Royaume-Uni.
18. Folbre, N. 1997. Gender coalitions: extrafamily influences on intra-family inequality. Dans L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott et H. Alderman (éds). (Op. cit.), p. 263-274.
19. Fortes, M. 1958. Introduction. Dans J. Goody (éd.). The developmental cycle in domestic groups, p. 1-14. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Royaume-Uni.
20. Gastellu, J.-M. 1980. Mais où sont donc ces unités économiques que nos amis cherchent tant en Afrique? Cahiers des Sciences Humaines, 28(1-2): 3-11, ORSTOM, France.
21. Griffiths, J. 1986. What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24: 1-55.
22. Guyer, J. 1981. Household and community in African studies. African Studies Review, 24(2-3): 87-134.
23. Guyer, J. 1997. Endowments and assets: the anthropology of wealth and the economics of intrahousehold allocation. Dans L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott et H. Alderman (éds). (Op. cit.), p. 112-125.
24. Guyer, J. et Peters, P., éds. 1987. Conceptualizing the household. Issues in theory and policy. Africa. Development and Change, 2(18).
25. Haddad L., Hoddinott, J. et Alderman, H., éds. 1997. Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries. Models, methods and policy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, Etats-Unis.
26. Lastarria-Cornhiel, S. 1997. Impact of privatization on gender and property rights in Africa. World Development, 25(8): 1317-1333.
27. Le Meur, P.-Y. 2002. Approche qualitative de la question foncière: Note méthodologique. IRD, Document de travail de l'UR 095.
28. Libecap, G. 1989. Contracting for property rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Royaume-Uni.
29. Mair, L. 1948. Modern developments in African land tenure, Africa 18. Anthropology and social change, The Athlone Press, Université de Londres. (Réimpression).
30. Mair, L. 1956. The contribution of social anthropology to the study of changes in African land rights. Document lu à la Conference on changes in African Land rights à l'Institut Solvay, janvier 1956, Bruxelles. Anthropology and social change, The Athlone Press. Université de Londres. (Réimpression).
31. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Royaume-Uni.
32. Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. 1995. La politique du terrain. Sur la production des données en anthropologie. Enquête, 1: 71-109.
33. Platteau, J.-P. 1996. The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to sub-Saharan Africa: a critical assessment. Development and Change, 27(1): 29-86.
34. Polanyi, K. 1957. The economy as an instituted process. Dans K. Polanyi, C.W. Arensberg et H.W. Pearson (éds). Trade and markets in the early empires. The Free Press, Chicago, Illinois, Etats-Unis.
35. Ramstad, Y. 1986. A pragmatist's quest for holistic knowledge: the scientific method of John R. Commons. Journal of Economic Issues, 20(4): 1067-1105.
36. Ruttan V. et Hayami, Y. 1984. Towards a theory of induced institutional innovation. Journal of Development Studies, 20(4): 203-223.
37. Schlager, E. et Ostrom, E. 1992. Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68(3): 249-262.
38. Schmid, A. 1987. Property, power & public choice. An inquiry into law and economics. Praeger, New York, Etats-Unis. (Deuxième édition)
39. Simon, H. 1986. Rationality in psychology and economics. Journal of Business, 59(4): S209-S224.
40. van Velsen, J. 1979. The extended-case method and situational analysis. Dans A.L. Epstein (éd.). The craft of social anthropology, p. 129-149. Pergamon Press, Oxford, Royaume-Uni.
41. von Benda-Beckmann F. et von Benda-Beckmann, K. 1999. A functional analysis of property rights, with special reference to Indonesia. Dans T. van Meijl et F. von Benda-Beckmann (éds.). Property rights and economic development. Land and natural resources in Southeast Asia and Oceania, p. 15-56, Kegan Paul International: Londres, Royaume-Uni et New York, Etats-Unis.