Bayesian inference for transductive learning of kernel matrix using the tanner-wong data augmentation algorithm

Proceedings, Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 935-942

  Zhang, Zhihua ^a   Yeung, Dit Yan ^a   Kwok, James T ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL MODEL; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; DATA AUGMENTATION ALGORITHMS; KERNEL MATRIX;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 14344253305     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Amari, S. (1995). Information geometry of the EM and em algorithms for neural networks. Neural Networks, 8, 1379-1408.
2. Bousquet, O., & Herrmann, D. J. L. (2003). On the complexity of learning the kernel matrix. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Crammer, K., Keshet, J., & Singer, Y. (2003). Kernel design using boosting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Cristianini, N., Kandola, J., Elisseeff, A., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2002). On kernel target alignment. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 39, 1-38.
6. Golub, G. H., & Loan, C. F. V. (1996). Matrix computations. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Third edition.
7. Gupta, A., & Nagar, D. (2000). Matrix variate distributions. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
8. Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985). Matrix analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Kandola, J., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Cristianini, N. (2002). Optimizing kernel alignment over combinations of kernels (Technical Report 2002-121). NeuroCOLT.
10. Lanckriet, G. R. G., Cristianini, N., Ghaoui, L. E., Bartlett, P., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). Learning the kernel matrix with semi-definite programming. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 323-330). Sydney, Australia.
11. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman & Hall.
12. Tanner, M. A., & Wong, W. H. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528-550.
13. Tsuda, K., Akaho, S., & Asai, K. (2003). The em algorithm for kernel matrix completion with auxiliary data. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4, 67-81.
14. Zhang, Z. (2003). Learning metrics via discriminant kernels and multidimensional scaling: Toward expected Euclidean representation. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 872-879). Washington, B.C., USA.
15. Zhang, Z., Kwok, J. T., Yeung, D. Y., & Xiong, Y. (2003a). Bayesian transductive learning of the kernel matrix using Wishart processes (Technical Report HKUST-CS03-09). Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Available from ftp://ftp.cs.ust.hk/pub/techreport/03/ tr03-09.ps.gz.
16. Zhang, Z., Yeung, D. Y., & Kwok, J. T. (2003b). Gaussian-Wishart processes: A statistical view of kernels and its application to kernel learning (Technical Report HKUST-CS03-15). Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Available from ftp://ftp.cs.ust.hk/pub/ techreport/03/tr03-15.ps.