Extensions of marginalized graph kernels

Proceedings, Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 552-559

  Mahé, Pierre ^a   Ueda, Nobuhisa ^b   Akutsu, Tatsuya ^b   Perret, Jean Luc ^b   Vert, Jean Philippe ^a  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BENCHMARKING; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; THEOREM PROVING; VECTORS;

GRAPH KERNELS; GRAPH SIZES; MORGAN ALGORITHMS; TOXICOLOGY;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 14344252908     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Debnath, A. K., de Compadre, R. L. L., Debnath, G., Schusterman, A., & Hansch, C. (1991). Structure-activity relationship of mutagenic aromatic and heteroaromatic nitro compounds, correlation with molecular orbital energies and hydrophobicity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 786-797.
2. Gärtner, T., Flach, P., & Wrobel, S. (2003). On graph kernels: Hardness results and efficient alternatives. Proc. of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory and the Seventh Annual Workshop on Kernel Machines. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
3. Gribskov, M., & Robinson, N. L. (1996). Use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate sequence matching. Computers and Chemistry, 20, 25-33.
4. Kashima, H., Tsuda, K., & Inokuchi, A. (2003). Marginalized kernels between labeled graphs. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 321-328). AAAI Press.
5. King, R. D., Muggleton, S. H., Srinivasan, A., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (1996). Structure-activity relationships derived by machine learning: The use of atoms and their bond connectivities to predict mutagenicity by inductive logic programming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 438-442.
6. Morgan, H. (1965). The generation of unique machine description for chemical structures - a technique developped at chemical abstracts service. Journal of Chemical Documentation, 107-113.
7. Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2002). Learning with kernels. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
8. Smola, A., & Kondor, I. (2003). Kernels and regularization on graphs. Learning Theory and Kernel Machines: 16th Annual Conference on Learning Theory and 7th Kernel Workshop, Colt/Kernel 2003 (pp. 144-158). Springer.
9. Toivonen, H., Srinivasan, A., King, R. D., Kramer, S., & Helma, C. (2003). Statistical evaluation of the predictive toxicology challenge 2000-2001. Bioinformatics, 19, 1183-1193.
10. Tsuda, K., Kin, T., & Asai, K. (2002). Marginalized kernels for biological sequences. Bioinformatics, 18, S268-S275.