Evaluating Inspection and Maintenance Programs: A Policy-Making Framework

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 147-162

  Eisinger, Douglas S ^a,b  

^a SONOMA TECHNOLOGY INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ZONES; HYDROCARBONS; INSPECTION; MAINTENANCE; PUBLIC POLICY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE (I/M); POLICY MAKING;

GROUND VEHICLES;

HYDROCARBON;

AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; EXHAUST GAS; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 14344250971     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: 21622906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464609     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Inspection/MaintenanceProgram Requirements; Final Rule, 40 CFR Part 51, Federal Register, Vol. 57, No. 215, pp. 52949-53014; November 5, 1992.
2. National Research Council. Evaluating Vehicle Emissions I/M Programs; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
3. Transportation Research Board. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, Assessing 10 Years of Experience, Special Report 264; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2002.
4. California Air Resources Board. Final Evaluation ofCalifornia's Enhanced Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program (Smog Check II); Sacramento, CA, 2000.
5. National Emission Inventory (NEI), Air Pollutant Emission Trends, Criteria Pollutant Data, Current Emission Trends Summaries, Average Annual Emissions, All Criteria Pollutants, Years Including 1980, 1985, 1989-2001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2003. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends/index.html (accessed May 2003).
6. Chinkin, L.R., Tamura, T.M., Eisinger, D.S., Gorin, C.A., Miller, D.S., Coe, D.L., MacDonald, C.P., Wheeler, N.J.M. Preliminary Assessment of Ozone andPMAir QualityIssues in Central Ohio; Report No. STI-902900-2377-FR; Sonoma Technology, Inc.: Petaluma, CA, 2003.
7. Marvin, C., Chang, E., Weir, J. Moving Toward Cleaner Transportation in California. Air and Waste Manage. Assoc.'s EM. 2004.
8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. I/M Briefing Book; EPA-AA-EPSD-I/M-94-1226; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1995.
9. California Inspection and Maintenance Review Committee. Smog CheckIIEvaluation, FullReport; Sacramento, CA, 2000. Available at: http://www.imreview.ca.gov/smogcheck/smog_full.htm (accessed March 25, 2004).
10. California Inspection and Maintenance Review Committee. Smog Check II Evaluation; Sacramento, CA, 2000.
11. Wenzel, T. Using Program Test Result Data to Evaluate the Phoenix I/M Program; Report to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. Lawrence Berkeley National laboratory: Berkeley, CA, 1999.
12. Ross, M., Goodwin, R., Watkins, R., Wang, M.Q., Wenzel, T. Real-World Emissions From Model Year 1993, 2000, and 2010 Passenger Cars; American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy: Washington, DC, 1995.
13. Stewart, R.W., Gourley, D.I., Wong, J. AirCare, Results and Observations Relating to the First Eight Years of Operation (1992-2000); Prepared for the Provincial Government of British Columbia, Canada; Pacific Vehicle Testing Technologies Ltd.: Burnaby, British Columbia, 2001.
14. Singer, B.C., Wenzel, T.P. Estimated Emission Reductions from California's Enhanced Smog Check Program. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37(11), 2588-2595.
15. National Transportation Statistics 2000; Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Washington, DC, 2001. Available at: http://www.bts.gov/btsprod/nts(accessed June 25, 2002).
16. Santos, A. I/M Implementation Status Report; Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association: Washington, DC, 1999. Available at: http://www.meca.org/jahia/Jahia/pid/229 (accessed July 14, 2003).
17. Ryan, P.A., Eisinger, D.S., Prouty, J.D. Travel Fraction Calculator User's Guide, Release Version 2.10., Draft final report STI-999692-1993-DFR1; Sonoma Technology, Inc.: Petaluma, CA, 2000.
18. Alberini, A., Harrington, W., McConnell, V. Fleet Turnover and Old Car Scrap Policies. Discussion Paper 98-23. Resources for the Future; Washington, DC, 1998. Available at: http://www.rff.org/disc_papers/PDF_files/9823.pdf (accessed July 2003).
19. California Air Resources Board. EMFAC2002; California Air Resources Board's Emissions Inventory Series; The Latest Update to the On-road Emissions Inventory; Sacramento, CA, 2002. Available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/on-road/onepagers/2002.pdf (accessed October 15, 2002).
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Official Release of EM-FAC2002 Motor Vehicle Emission Factor Model for Use in the State of California. Notice of Availability. Fed. Regist. 2003, 68(62), 15720-15723.
21. Emissions Repair Guide; Air Care Colorado; Envirotest Systems Corporation: Arvada, CO, 2003. Available at: http://www.aircarecolorado.com/repairguide/default.htm (accessed July 9, 2003).
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Amendments to Vehicle Inspection Maintenance Program Requirements Incorporating the Onboard Diagnostic Check; Final Rule. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 85. Fed. Regist. 2001, 66, 18156-18179.
23. Amlin, D. California's OBDII Program Update. Presented at Colorado State University, National Center for Vehicle Emissions Control and Safety, 18th Annual Mobile Sources/Clean Air Conference, September 11, 2002.
24. Barrett, R. An Assessment of the Colorado I/M240 and OBDII Inspection's Ability to Identify Vehicles Needing Emissions Related Repairs. In 13th Coordinating Research Council On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop; San Diego, CA, 2003.