A simplified method for simulation of strong ground motion using finite rupture model of the earthquake source

Journal of Seismology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 467-484

  Joshi, A ^a,b   Midorikawa, S ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Envelope; Filter; Green's function; Ground motion simulation; Stochastic; Strong motion; Subfault; Transmission; White noise

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE HYPOCENTER; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; GROUND MOTION; SIMULATION; STRONG MOTION;

EID: 14244268526     PISSN: 13834649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-004-1595-z     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aki, K., 1967, Scaling laws of seismic spectrum, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1217-1231.
2. Atkinson, G.M. and Silva, W., 2000, Stochastic modelling of California ground motions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 255-274.
3. Beresnev, Igor A. and Atkinson, Gail M., 1997, Modeling finite fault radiation from ωn spectrum, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87, 67-84.
4. Boore, D.M., 1983, Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motion based on Seismological Models of Radiated Spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73, 1865-1894.
5. Boore, D.M. and Atkinson, G.M., 1987, Stochastic prediction of ground acceleration and spectral response parameters at hard rock sites in Eastern North America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 440-467.
6. D.M. Boore 1987 The Prediction of Strong Ground Motion In: M. Erdik M.N. Toksoz eds. Strong Ground Motion Seismology NATO Advanced Studies Institute series D. Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht, The Netherlands
7. Brune, J.N., 1970, Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4997-5009.
8. Brune, J.N, 1971, Correction, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5002.
9. Coats, D.A., Kanamori, H. and Houston, H., 1984, Simulation of strong ground motion from the 1964 Alaskan earthquake (Abs.), Earthquake Notes 55, 18.
10. EIC, 2001, EIC Seismology Notes 103, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, (Address of the quoted website: http://wwweic.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/EIC/EICNews/010403.html) (In Japanese).
11. EQE website, 2001, M6.9 Geiyo earthquake strikes southwest Japan (Address of the website quoted in the text: http://www.eqe.com/revamp/HiroshimaEW.htm).
12. Hadley, D.M., Helmberger, D.V., 1980, Simulation of strong ground motions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 70, 617-610.
13. Hadley, D.M., Helmberger, D.V. and Orcutt, J.A., 1982, Peak acceleration scaling studies, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 959-979.
14. Hanks, T.C. and McGuire, R.K., 1981, Character of high frequency ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71, 2071-2095.
15. Hartzell, S.H., 1978, Earthquake aftershocks as Green functions, Geophy. Res. Lett. 5,1-4.
16. Hartzell, S.H., 1982, Simulation of ground accelerations for May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California earthquakes., Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 2381-2387.
17. w > 81/4) earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 478-488.
18. Heaton T.H. and Hartzell, S.H., 1986, Estimation of strong ground motions from hypothetical earthquakes on the Caseadia subductionz, Pacific Northwest, U.S. Geological Survey. Open file Report.
19. Housner, G.W. and Jennings, P.C., 1964, Generation of artificial earthquakes, Proc. ASCE 90, 113-150.
20. Houston, H. and Kanamori, H., 1984, The effect of asperities on short period seismic radiation with application on rupture process and strong motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76, 19-42.
21. Houstan, H. and Kanamori, H., 1986, Source spectra of great earthquakes: Telescismic constraints on rupture process and strong motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76, 19-42.
22. Hutchings, L., 1985, Modclling earthquakes with empirical Green's functions (Abs.), Earthquake Notes 56, 14.
23. Idriss, I.M., Sun and Joseph, I., 1992, SHAKE91: A computer program for conducting equivavlent lincar scismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, California.
24. Imagawa, K., Mikami, N. and Mikumo, T., 1984, Analytical and semi empirical synthesis of near field scismic waveforms for investigating the rupture mechanism of major earthquakes, J. Phys. Earth 32, 317-338.
25. Irikura, K., 1986, Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical Green's function, Proc. 7th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, pp. 151-156.
26. Irikura, K., 1983, Semi empirical estimation of strong motion during large earthquakes, Bull. Disaster Prev. Res. Inst. (Kyoto Univ.) 33, 63-104.
27. Irikura, K. and Kamae, K., 1994, Estimation of strong ground motion in broad frequency band based on a scismic source scaling model and an empirical Green's function technique, Annali di Geo Fisica XXXVII, 1721-1743.
28. Irikura, K., Kagawa T. and Sckiguchi, H., 1997, Revision of the empirical Green's function method by Irikura (1986), (Programme and Abstracts), Seismol. Soc. Jpn. 2, B25.
29. Irikura, K. and Muramatu, I., 1982, Synthesis of strong ground motions from large earthquakes using observed seismograms of small events, Proceedings of the 3rd International Microzonation Conference, Seattle, p. 447-458.
30. Joshi, A., and Midorikawa, S., 2003, Attenuation characteristics of ground motion intensity from earthquakes with intermediate depth, J. Seismol. (Communicated).
31. Joshi, A., Singh, S. and Giroti, K. 2001, The simulation of ground motions using envelope summations, PAGEOPH 158, 877-901.
32. Kamae, K. and Irikura, K., 1998, Source model of the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake and simulation of near source ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, 400-412.
33. Kamae, K., Irikura, K. and Pitarka, A., 1998, A technique for simulating strong ground motion using hybrid Green's function, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 357-367.
34. Kameda, H. and Sujito, M., 1978, Prediction of strong earthquake motions by evolutionary process model, Proceedings of the 6th Japan earthquake Engineering Symposium, pp. 41-48.
35. Kanamori, H., 1979, A semi empirical approach to prediction of long period ground motions from great earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 69, 1645-1670.
36. Kanamori, H. and Anderson, D.L., 1975, Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65, 1073-1095.
37. Kanai, K., 1951, Relation between the nature of surface layer and the amplitude of earthquake motions, Bull. Tokyo Earthquake Res. Inst.
38. Kiyono, J., 1992, Identification and synthesis of seismic ground motion in structural response analysis, Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering Kyoto University.
39. Koketsu, K., 2001, Velocity structure in the Geiyo region, (Personnel communication).
40. Kumar, D., Khattri, K.N., Teotia, S.S. and Rai, S.S., 1999, Modelling of accelerograms for two Himalayan earthquakes using a novel semi empirical method and estimation of accelerogram for a hypothetical great earthquake in the Himalaya, Curr. Sci. 76, 819-830.
41. Lai, S.P., 1982, Statistical characterization of strong ground motions using Power Spectral Density Function, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 259-274.
42. T. Lay T.C. Wallace 1995 Modern Global Seismology Academic Press California 521
43. W.H.K. Lee S.W. Stewart 1981 Principles and Applications of Microearthquake Networks Academic Press New York 293
44. Lysmer, J., Seed, Bolton, H. and Schnabel, P.B., 1971, Influence of base rock characteristics on ground response, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 61, 1213-1232.
45. Mai, P. Martin and Beroza and Gregory C., 2000, Source scaling properties from finite fault rupture models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 604-615.
46. Matthiesen, R.B., Duke, C.M., Leeds, D.J. and Fraser, J.C., 1964, Site characteristics of southern California Strong Motion Earthquake Stations, Part two, Report no. 64-15, Department of Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, August.
47. McGuire, R.K., Becker, A.M. and Donovan, N.C., 1984, Spectral estimates of scismic shear waves, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 2167-2185.
48. Mendoza, C. and Hartzell, S., 1988, Inversion for slip distribution using teleseismic P Waveforms, North Palm Springs, Borah Peak, and Michoacan earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 1092-1111.
49. Midorikawa, S., 1989, Synthesis of ground acceleration of large earthquakes using acceleration envelope waveform of small earthquake, J. Struct. Construct. Eng. 398, 23-30.
50. Midorikawa, S., 1993, Semi empirical estimation of peak ground acceleration from large earthquakes, Tectonophysics 218, 287-295.
51. Midorikawa, S. and Kobayashi, H., 1978, On estimation of strong earthquake motions with regard to fault rupture, Proceeding of the of the second Int. Conference on Microzonation, 2, pp. 825-836.
52. Mikumo T., Irikura, K. and Imagawa, K., 1981, Near field strong motion synthesis from foreshock and aftershock records and rupture process of the main shock fault (Abs.), IASPEI 21st General Assembly, London.
53. Mugnuia, L. and Brunc, J.M., 1984, Simulations of storng ground motions for earthquakes in the Mexicali-Imperial valley, Proceedings of workshop on strong ground motion simulation and earthquake engineering applications, Pub. 85-02 Earthquake Engineering Research Institue, Los Altos, California, 21-1-21-19.
54. L. Reiter 1990 Earthquake hazard analysis - issues and insights Columbia University Press New York 254
55. Rocssct, J.M. and Whitman, R.V., 1969, Theoretical background for amplification studies, Research Report No. R69-15, Soils publications No. 231., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
56. R. Sato (ed) 1989 Handbook of Fault Parameters of Japanese Earthquakes Kajima Tokyo
57. w = 7.0 earthquake on the Elysian Thrust Fault, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83, 780-810.
58. Saikia, C.K. and Herrmann, R.B., 1985, Application of waveform modelling to determine focal mechanisms of four 1982 Miramichi aftershocks, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 75, 1021-1040.
59. Sehnable, P.B., Lysmer, J. and Seed, H. Bolton, 1972, SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, Report No. UCB/EERC-71/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, p. 102.
60. Sekiguchi, H. and Iwata, T., 2001, Rupture process of the 2001 Geiyo earthquake obtained from strong motion data (Website address: http://sms.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/iwata/gciyo-c.html).
61. Si, H. and Midorikawa, S., 2000, New attenuation relations for peak ground acceleration and velocity considering effects of fault type and site condition, Proceedings of Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper# 532.
62. Somerville, P.G., Sen, M.K. and Cohece, B.P., 1991, Simulation of strong ground motions recorded during the 1985 Michoacan, Mexico and Valparaiso Chile earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81, 1-27.
63. Somerville, P., K. Irikura, S. Sawada, Y. Iwasaki, Tai, M. and Fishimi, M., 1993, Spatial distribution of slip on earthquake fault, Proceedings of the 22 JSCA earthquake Engineering Symposium, 291-294 (In Japanese).
64. Toro, G.R. and McGuire, R.K., 1987, An investigation into earthquake ground motion characteristics in eastern north America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 468-489.
65. Yu, G., 1994, Some aspect of earthquakes: Slip partitioning along major convergent plate boundaries; composite source model for estimation of strong motion; and nonlinear soil response modelling, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.
66. Yu, G., Khattri, K.N., Anderson, J.G., Brune, J.N. and Zeng, Y., 1995, Strong ground motion from the Uttarkashi, Himalaya, India, earthquake: Comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 31-50.
67. Zeng, Y., Anderson, J.G. and Su, F., 1994, A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 725-728.