Attention guided MPEG compression for computer animations

Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, SCCG 2003 - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 239-244

  Mantiuk, Rafal ^a   Myszkowski, Karol ^b   Pattanaik, Sumanta ^c  

^a WEST POMERANIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

MPEG; Streaming; Video compression; Virtual environment; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRAPHIC METHODS; IMAGE COMPRESSION; MAPS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

MPEG; NETWORK DEVICES; STREAMING; VISUAL ATTENTION;

ANIMATION;

EID: 14244262932     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/984952.984991     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. BORDES, P. AND GUILLOTEL, P. 2000. Perceptually Adapted MPEG Video Encoding. Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, pages 168-175.
2. COHEN-OR, D., MANN Y. AND FLEISHMAN, S. 1999. Deep Compression for Streaming Texture Intensive Animations. Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH 1999, 261-267.
3. ITTI, L. 2000. Models of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Visual Attention. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.
4. ITTI, L. Jan 2002. Real-Time High-Performance Attention Focusing in Outdoors Color Video Streams. In: Proc. SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VII (HVEI'02), San Jose, CA, (B. Rogowitz, T. N. Pappas Ed.), pages 235-243.
5. JARMASZ, J. December 2001. Towards the Integration of Perceptual Organization and Visual Attention: The Inferential Attentional Allocation Model.Carleton University. Cognitive Science Technical Report 2001-08. URL: http://www.carleton.ca/iis/TechReports.
6. HABER, J., MYSZKOWSKI, K., YAMAUCHI, H. AND SEIDEL, H-P. Perceptually Guided Corrective Splatting. 2001. In EuroGraphics (Manchester, UK, September 4-7 2001), pages 142-152.
7. LEVOY, M. 1995. Polygon-assisted JPEG and MPEG compression of synthetic images. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH 1995. 21-28.
8. MANN, Y. AND COHEN-OR, D. 1997. Selective Pixel Transmission for Navigating in Remote Virtual Environments, EuroGraphics '97, Volume 16, (1997), Number 3, 201-206.
9. OSBERGER, W., MAEDER, A.J. AND BERGMANN, N. January 1998. A Perceptually Based Quantization Technique for MPEG Encoding. Proceedings SPIE 3299 - Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, San Jose, California, USA, 26-29.
10. TIPPER, S.P. AND WEAVER, B. 1998. The medium of attention: Location-based, object-based, or scene-based? In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual Attention (77-107). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
11. TREISMAN, A. AND GELADE, G. 1980. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, pages 97-136.
12. YANG, J., WU, L. AND WAIBEL, A. June 1996. Focus of Attention in Video Conferencing. Technical Report, CMU-CS-96-150, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. URL: http://reports-archive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/cs1996. html.
13. YARBUS, A. L. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press, New York.
14. YEE, H., PATTANAIK, S. N. AND GREENBERG, D. P. 2001. Spatio-Temporal Sensitivity and Visual Attention in Dynamic Environments. ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics, Vol. 20(1), pages 39-65.
15. YOON, I. AND NEUMANN, U. 2000. Web-Based Remote Rendering with IBRAC. EuroGraphics 2000. Volume 19 (2000), Number 3.
16. ZELLER, C. 2002. Balancing the Graphics Pipeline for Optimal Performance. GDC2002 Tutorial. URL: http://developer.nvidia.com/docs/IO/3564/ATT/ PipelinePerformance.pdf