Feedback in psychotherapy

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 209-217

  Claiborn, Charles D ^a   Goodyear, Rodney K ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Feedback; Psychological tests; Psychotherapy; Psychotherapy outcome

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REVIEW;

FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

EID: 14244262840     PISSN: 00219762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20112     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Bateson, G. (1968). The biosocial integration of behavior in the schizophrenic family. In D.D. Jackson (Ed.), Therapy, communication, and change (pp. 9-15). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior.
2. Baumgardner, A.H., Kaufman, C.M., & Levy, P.E. ( 1989). Regulating affect interpersonally when low esteem leads to greater enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 907-921.
3. Benne, K.D., Bradford, L.P., & Lippitt, R. (1964). The laboratory method. In L.P. Bradford, J.R. Gibb, & K.D. Benne (Eds.), T-group theory and laboratory method (pp. 15-44). New York: Wiley.
4. Berg, M. (1985). The feedback process in diagnostic psychological testing. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 49, 52-69.
5. Claiborn, C.D. (1986). Social influence: Toward a general theory of change. In F.J. Dorn (Ed.), Social influence processes in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 31-42). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
6. Claiborn, C.D., Goodyear, R.K., & Horner, P.A. (2001). Feedback. Psychotherapy, 38, 401-405.
7. Claiborn, C.D., Goodyear, R.K., & Horner, P.A. (2002). Feedback. In J.C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 217-233). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Claiborn, C.D., & Hansen, W.E. (1999). Test interpretation: A social influence perspective. In J.W. Lichtenberg & R.K. Goodyear (Eds.), Scientist-practitioner perspectives on test interpretation (pp. 151-166). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
9. Davies, M.F. (1997). Positive test strategies and confirmatory retrieval processes in the evaluation of personality feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 574-583.
10. Dykman, B.M., Horowitz, L.M., Abramson, L.Y., & Usher, M. (1991). Schematic and situational determinants of depressed and nondepressed students' interpretation of feedback. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 45-55.
11. Elliott, R. (1985). Helpful and nonhelpful events in brief counseling interviews: An empirical taxonomy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 307-322.
12. Finn, S.E. (1996). Manual for using the MMPI-2 as a therapeutic intervention. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Finn, S.E., & Tonsager, M.E. (1992). Therapeutic effects of providing MMPI-2 test feedback to college students awaiting therapy. Psychological Assessment, 4, 278-287.
14. Glencavage, L.M., & Norcross, J.C. (1990). Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 372-378.
15. Hansen, W.E., Claiborn, C.D., & Kerr, B.A. (1997). Differential effects of two test-interpretation styles in counseling: A field study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 400-405.
16. Jacobs, A. (1974). The use of feedback in groups. In A. Jacobs & W.E. Spradlin (Eds.), The group as an agent of change (pp. 408-448). New York: Behavioral Publications.
17. Kemenoff, S., Worchel, F, Prevatt, B., & Willson, V. (1995). The effects of video feedback in the context of Milan systematic therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 446-450.
18. Kivlighan, D.M. (1985). Feedback in group psychotherapy: Review and implications. Small Group Behavior, 16, 373-385.
19. Kluger, A.N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
20. MacFarland, W.L., & Morris, S.J. (1998). Are dysphoric individuals more suggestible or less suggestible than nondysphoric individuals? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 225-229.
21. McNulty, S.E., & Swann, W.B. (1991). Psychotherapy, self-concept change, and self-verification. In R.C. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self (pp. 213-237). New York: Guilford.
22. Morran, D.K., Robison, F., & Stockton, R. (1985). Feedback exchange in counseling groups: An analysis of message content and receiver acceptance as a function of leader versus member delivery, session, and valence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 57-67.
23. Morran, D.K., & Stockton, R. (1980). Effect of self-concept on group member reception of positive and negative feedback. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 260-267.
24. Morran, D.K., Stockton, R., Kline, R.J., & Teed, C. (1998). Facilitating feedback exchange in groups: Leader interventions. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 23, 257-268.
25. Newman, M.L., & Greenway, P. (1997). Therapeutic effects of providing MMPI-2 test feedback to clients at a university counseling service. Psychological Assessment, 9, 122-131.
26. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
27. Rapee, R.M., & Hayman, K. (1996). The effects of video feedback on the self-evaluation of performance in socially anxious subjects. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 315-322.
28. Schaible, T.D., & Jacobs, A. (1975). Feedback III: Sequence effects: Enhancement of feedback acceptance and group attractiveness by manipulation of the sequence and valence of feedback. Small Group Behavior, 6, 151-173.
29. Strong, S.R., & Matross, R.P. (1973). Change processes in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20, 25-37.
30. Thelen, M.H., & Lasoski, M.C. (1980). The separate and combined effects of focusing information and videotape self-confrontation feedback. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 11, 173-178.