Visual attention models for producing high fidelity graphics efficiently

Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, SCCG 2003 - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 39-46

  Chalmers, Alan ^a   Cater, Kirsten ^a   Maflioli, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Realistic Computer Graphics; Saliency Maps; Task Maps; Visual Perception

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BENCHMARKING; CATHODE RAY TUBES; COLOR IMAGE PROCESSING; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER VISION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; IMAGE QUALITY; MAPS; SMART CARDS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

REALISTIC COMPUTER GRAPHICS; SALIENCY MAPS; TASK MAPS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 14244261621     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/984952.984960     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. CATER K., CHALMERS A.G., AND DALTON C. 2003. Varying Rendering Fidelity by Exploiting Human Change Blindness, In Proceedings of GRAPHITE 2003, ACM.
2. CATER K., CHALMERS A.G., AND LEDDA P. 2002. Selective Quality Rendering by Exploiting Human Inattentional Blindness: Looking but not Seeing, In Proceedings of Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology 2002, ACM, 17-24.
3. CATER K., CHALMERS A.G., AND WARD G. 2003. Detail to Attention: Exploiting Visual Tasks for Selective Rendering, submitted for publication.
4. DALY S. 1993. The Visible Differences Predictor: An Algorithm for the Assessment of Image Fidelity. In A.B. Watson, editor, Digital Image and Human Vision, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 179-206.
5. DOWLING J.E. 1987. The retina: An approachable part of the brain, Cambridge: Belknap.
6. FERWERDA J., PATTANAIK S.N., SHIRLEY P., AND GREENBERG D.P. 1996. A Model of Visual Adaptation for Realistic Image Synthesis, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York. H. Rushmeier, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 249-258.
7. GREENBERG D.P., TORRANCE K.E., SHIRLEY P., ARVO J., FERWERDA J., PATTANAIK S.N., LAFORTUNE A.E., WALTER B., FOO S-C., AND TRUMBORE B. 1997. A Framework for Realistic Image Synthesis, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1997 (Special Session), ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York. T. Whitted, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 477-494.
8. ITTI L. AND KOCH C. 2000. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention, In Vision Research, vol. 40, no 10-12, 1489-1506.
9. JAMES W. 1890 Principles of Psychology, New York: Holt.
10. LEE M., REDNER R., AND USELTON S. 1985. Statistically Optimized Sampling for Distributed Ray Tracing, Siggraph vol. 19, No. 3.
11. LOSCHKY L.C., AND MCCONKIE G.W. 1999. Gaze Contingent Displays: Maximizing Display Bandwidth Efficiency. ARL Federated Laboratory Advanced Displays and Interactive Displays Consortium, Advanced Displays and Interactive Displays Third Annual Symposium, 79-83.
12. LOSCHKY L.C., MCCONKIE G.W., YANG, J., AND MILLER M.E. 2001. Perceptual Effects of a Gaze-Contingent Multi-Resolution Display Based on a Model of Visual Sensitivity. In the ARL Federated Laboratory 5th Annual Symposium - ADID Consortium Proceedings, 53-58.
13. LUBEKE D. AND HALLEN B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering, In Proceedings of 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 221-223.
14. LUBEKE D., REDDY M., WATSON B., COHEN J. AND VARSHNEY A. 2001. Advanced Issues in Level of Detail. Course #41 at SIGGRAPH 2001. Los Angeles, CA. August 12-17, 2001.
15. MACIEL P.W.C., AND SHIRLEY P. 1995. Visual Navigation of Large Environments Using Textured Clusters, In Proceedings of Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 95-102.
16. MACK A. AND ROCK I. 1998. Inattentional Blindness, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
17. MCNAMARA A., CHALMERS A.G., TROSCIANKO T., AND GILCHRIST I. 2000. Comparing Real and Synthetic Scenes using Human Judgements of Lightness. In B Peroche and H Rushmeier (eds), 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 207-219.
18. MCCONKIE G.W., AND LOSCHKY L.C. 1997. Human Performance with a Gaze-Linked Multi-Resolutional Display. ARL Federated Laboratory Advanced Displays and Interactive Displays Consortium, Advanced Displays and Interactive Displays First Annual Symposium, 25-34.
19. MYSZKOWSKI K., TAWARA T., AKAMINE H. AND SEIDEL H-P. 2001. Perception-Guided Global Illumination Solution for Animation Rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York. E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 221-230.
20. O'REGAN J.K., DEUBEL H., CLARK J.J., AND RENSINK R. A. 2000. Picture changes during blinks: looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition. 7, 1, 191-212.
21. PARKHURST, D., LAW, K.AND NIEBUR E. 2002. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, vol 42, pp 107-123.
22. PATTANAIK S.N., FERWERDA J., FAIRCHILD M.D., AND GREENBERG D.P. 1998. A Multiscale Model of Adaptation and Spatial Vision for Realistic Image Display, in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1998, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York. M. Cohen, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 287-298.
23. PATTANAIK S.N., TUMBLIN, J., YEE H., GREENBERG, D. P. 2000. Time-Dependent Visual Adaptation For FastRealistic Image Display. ACM Computer Graphics(Proc. of SIGGRAPH) '00, 47-53
24. RAMASUBRAMANIAN M., PATTANAIK S.N., AND GREENBERG D.P. 1999. A Perceptually Based Physical Error Metric for Realistic Image Synthesis, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York. Computer A. Rockwood, Ed., Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 73-82.
25. REDDY M. 1997. Perceptually Modulated Level of Detail for Virtual Environments. Ph.D. Thesis (CST- 134-97), University of Edinburgh.
26. TUMBLIN, J., RUSHMEIER, H. 1993. Tone Reproduction for Realistic images. IEEE Computer graphics and Applications, 13(6):42-48.
27. WARD, G. 1994. The RADIANCE Lighting Simulation and Rendering System. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1994, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH. New York. Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 459-472.
28. WARD-LARSON, G., RUSHMEIER, H., PIATKO, C. 1997. A Visibility Matching Tone Reproduction Operator for High Dynamic range Scene. IEEE Transaction on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 3(4):291-306.
29. WARD LARSON, G. 1998. Rendering with RADIANCE: The art and science of lighting simulation. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffman.
30. WATSON, B., FRIEDMAN. A., AND MCGAFFEY, A. 1997. An evaluation of Level of Detail Degradation in Head-Mounted Display Peripheries. Presence, 6, 6, 630-637.
31. WATSON B., FRIEDMAN A., AND MCGAFFEY A. 2001. Measuring and Predicting Visual Fidelity, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York. E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 213-220.
32. YANTIS S. 1996. Attentional capture in vision. In A. Kramer, M. Coles and G. Logan (eds), Converging operations in the study of selective visual attention, 45-76, American Psychological Association.
33. YARBUS A.L. 1967. Eye movements during perception of complex objects. In L. A. Riggs, Ed., Eye Movements and Vision, Plenum Press, New York, Chapter VII, 171-196.
34. YEE H. 2000. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments, MSc. Thesis, Program of Computer Graphics, Cornell University.
35. YEE H., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D.P. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and Visual Attention for efficient rendering of dynamic Environments, In ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics, vol. 20, no 1, 39-65.