Reporting systems in healthcare from a case-by-case experience to a general framework: An example in anaesthesia

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 757-765

  Nyssen, Anne Sophie ^a   Aunac, S ^b   Faymonville, M E ^c   Lutte, I ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia, reporting systems; Quality assurance, healthcare; Risk management; Safety management

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANESTHESIA; BELGIUM; CONSENSUS; DATA ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; PRIVACY; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WELLBEING;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; BELGIUM; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; MEDICAL ERRORS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 14244249412     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003643-200410000-00001     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC, USA: National Academy Press, 2000.
2. Currie M, Pybus DA, Torda TA. A prospective study of anaesthetic critical events: a report on a pilot study of 88 cases. Anaesth Intens Care 1989; 16: 98-100.
3. Sanborn KV, Castro J, Kuroda M, Thys DM. Detection of intraoperative incidents by electronic scanning of computerized anesthesia records. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 977-987.
4. Runciman WB, Helps SC, Sexton EJ, Malpass A. A classification for incidents and accidents in the health-care system. J Qual Clin Proct 1998; 18: 199-211.
5. Webb RK, Currie M, Morgan CA, et al. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study: An Analysis of 2000 Incident Reports. Anaesth Intern Care 1993; 21: 520-528.
6. van Vuuren W, Shea CE, van der Schaaf TW. The Development of an Incident Analysis Tool for the Medical Field. Report EUT/BDK/85. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Safety Management Group, Faculty of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1997.
7. De Keyser V, Nyssen AS. Les erreurs humaines en anesthésie. Le Travail Humain 1993; 56: 2-3, 233-241.
8. Johnson CW. Visualising the relationship between human error and organisational failure. In: Dixon M, ed. Proceedings of the 17th International Systems Safety Conference. Unionville, Virginia, USA: The Systems Safety Society, 1999: 101-110.
9. Caroll JM. Scenario-Based Design. New York, USA: Wiley & Sons, 1995.
10. Cook R, Woods D, Miller C. A Tale of Two Stories: Contrasting Views of Patient Safety. Report from a Workshop on Assembling the Scientific Basis for Progress on Patient Safety. Chicago, USA: National Health Care Safety Council of the National Patient Safety Foundation at the AMA, 1998.
11. Busse DK, Johnson CW Identification and analysis of incidents in complex, medical environments. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Human Error and Clinical Systems. Glasgow, UK: Glasgow Accident Analysis Group, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, 1998.
12. Runciman WB. Iatrogenic Injury in Australia. Report of the Australian Patient Safety Foundation for the National Health Priorities and Quality Branch of the Department of Health and Aged Care of the Commonwealth. Government of Australia, 2000.
13. Nyssen AS, Hansez I, Baele P, De Keyser V, Lamy M. Occupational stress and burnout in anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 333-337.
14. Lutsky I. Use of psychoactive substances among American anesthesiologists: a 30 year retrospective study. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 915-921.
15. Weeks AM, Buckland MR, Morgan EB, Myles PS. Chemical dependance in anaesthetic registrars in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intens Care 1993; 21: 151-155.