Assessment matters: Some issues concerning the supervision and assessment of work-based doctorates

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 87-92

  Johnson, David ^a,b  

^a Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Economics Finance and Accounting   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14144254523     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703290500048994     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Bareham, J., Bourner, T. & Ruggeri-Stevens, G. (2000) The DBA: what is it for?, Career Development International, 5(7) 394-403.
2. Burnham, P. (1998) The PhD viva, paper presented at the UK Council for Graduate Education Annual Summer Conference, London, 15-16 July.
3. Coventry University (2003) Academic regulations, 2002-3 (Coventry, Coventry University).
4. Eraut, M. (1996) Developing professional knowledge and competence (London, Falmer Press).
5. Gillingham, D. (1999) The need for a new doctoral level qualification, International Higher Education, Journal of the T.E.X.T. Consortium, 7, November, 36-37.
6. Maxwell, T. (2003) From first to second generation professional doctorate, Studies in Higher Education, 28, 2-19.
7. Maxwell, T. & Shanahan, P. (Eds) (1998) Professional doctorates: innovations in research and teaching (Armidale, Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, University of New England).
8. Quality Assurance Agency (2001) The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (Gloucestor, Quality Assurance Agency).
9. Ruggeri-Stevens, G., Bareham, J. & Bourner, T. (2001) The DBA in British universities: assessments and standards, Quality Assurance in Education, 9(2).
10. Wakeford, J. (2002) What goalposts? To fail a PhD at the viva is devastating, The Guardian, 17 September, p. 35.