A farmer-oriented Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L., breed improvement in the Philippines

Aquaculture Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 113-119

  Basiao, Zubaida U ^a   Arago, Adelaide L ^a   Doyle, Roger W ^b  

^a Binangonan Freshwater Station   (Philippines)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Artificial selection; Farmer participatory research; Tilapia

Indexed keywords

AQUACULTURE; AQUACULTURE PRODUCTION; BROOD STOCK; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SMALL SCALE INDUSTRY;

ASIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; PHILIPPINES; SOUTHEAST ASIA; WORLD;

OREOCHROMIS NILOTICUS; TILAPIA;

EID: 14144253127     PISSN: 1355557X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2004.01053.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abella T.A., Palada M.S. & Newkirk G.F. (1990) Within-family selection for growth rate with rotational mating in Oreochromis niloticus. In: The Second Asian Fisheries Forum (ed. by R. Hirano & I. Hanyu). pp. 515-518. Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines.
2. Basiao Z.U. & Doyle R.W. (1999) Test of size-specific mass selection for Nile tilapia. Oreochromis niloticus L., cage farming in the Philippines. Aquaculture Research 30, 373-378.
3. Behrends L.L., Kingsley J.B. & Price A.H. III (1988) Bidirectional backcross selection for body weight in a red tilapia. In: The Second International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture (ed. by R.S.V. Pullin, T. Bhukaswan, K. Tonguthai & J.L. Maclean). pp. 125-133. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 15. Department of Fisheries, Bangkok, Thailand, and International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines.
4. Bolivar R.B. & Newkirk G.F. (2002) Response to within-family selection for body weight in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using a single-trait animal model. Aquaculture 204, 371-381.
5. Bolivar R.B., Bartolome Z.P. & Newkirk G.F. (1994) Response to within-family selection for growth in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. In: The Third Asian Fisheries Forum (ed. by L.M. Chou. A.D. Munro, T.J. Lam, T.W. Chen, L.K.K. Cheong, J.K. Ding, K.K. Hooi, H.W. Khoo, V.P.E. Phang, K.F. Shim & C.H. Tan), pp. 548-555. Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines.
6. Brush S.B. & Meng E. (1998) Farmer's valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 45, 139-150.
7. Brzeski V.J. & Doyle R.W. (1995) A test of on-farm selection procedure for tilapia growth in Indonesia. Aquaculture 137, 219-230.
8. Doyle R.W. & Talbot A.J. (1986a) Artificial selection on growth and correlated selection on competitive behaviour in fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43(Suppl. 1), 1059-1064.
9. Doyle R.W. & Talbot A.J. (1986b) Effective population size and selection in variable aquaculture stocks. Aquaculture 57. 27-35.
10. Doyle R.W., Shackel N.L., Basiao Z., Uraiwan S., Matricia T. & Talbot A.J. (1991) Selective diversification of aquaculture stocks: a proposal for economically sustainable genetic conservation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48(Suppl. 1), 148-154.
11. Dunham R.A., Brummett R.E., Ella M.O. & Smitherman R.O. (1990) Genotype-environment interaction for growth of blue, channel and hybrid catfish in ponds and cages at varying densities. Aquaculture 85, 143-151.
12. Eknath A.E., Tayamen M.M., Palada de Vera M.S., Danting J.C., Reyes R.A., Dionisio E.E., Capili J.B., Bolivar H.L., Abella T.A., Circa A.V., Bentsen H.B., Gjerde B., Gjedrem T. & Pullin R.S.V. (1993) Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias: the growth performance of eight strains of Oreochromis niloticus tested in different farm environments. Aquaculture 111, 171-188.
13. Gibson J.P. & Wilton J.W. (1998) Defining multiple-trait objectives for sustainable genetic improvement. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2303-2307.
14. Hatch U. & Engle C. (1987) Economic analysis of aquaculture as a component of integrated agro-aquaculture systems: some evidence from Panama. Journal of Aquaculture in the Tropics 2, 93-105.
15. Hawtin G., Iwanaga M. & Hodgkin T. (1996) Genetic resources in breeding for adaptation. Euphytica 92, 225-266.
16. Huang C.M. & Liao I.C. (1990) Response to mass selection for growth rate in Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 85, 199-205.
17. Hulata G., Wohlfarth G.W. & Halevy A. (1986) Mass selection for growth rate in the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 57, 177-184.
18. Jarimopas P. (1990) Realized response of Thai red tilapia to 5 generations of size-specific selection for growth. In: The Second Asian Fisheries Forum (ed. by R. Hirano & I. Hanyu), pp. 109-111. Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines.
19. Land R.B. (1981) An alternative philosophy for livestock breeding. Livestock Production Science 8, 95-99.
20. Mair G.C., Abucay J.S., Beardmore J.A. & Skibinski D.O.F. (1995) Growth performance trials of genetically male tilapia (GMT) derived from YY-males in Oreochromis niloticus L. On station comparisons with mixed sex and sex reversed male populations. Aquaculture 137, 313-322.
21. Moav R. & Wohlfarth G.W. (1984) Magnification through competition of genetic differences in yield capacity in carp. Heredity 33, 181-202.
22. Moav R., Soller M. & Hulata G. (1976) Genetic aspects of the transition from traditional to modern fish farming. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 47, 285-290.
23. Notter D.R. (1999) The importance of genetic populations diversity in livestock populations of the future. Journal of Animal Science 77, 61-69.
24. Philippine Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (2002). Philippine Fisheries Profile 2002.
25. Piergiovanni A.R. & Laghetti G. (1999) The common bean landraces from Basilicata (Southern Italy): an example of integrated approach applied to genetic resources management. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46, 47-52.
26. Ruzzante D.E. (1993) Domestication effects on aggressive and schooling behaviour in fish. Aquaculture 120, 1-24.
27. Sanchez T., de Ponce L.R., Aguilar M., Vasquez J. & McAndrew B. (1995) Response to selection and heritabilities for weight in Oreochromis aureus Steindachner after five generations of selection. Aquaculture 137, 271.
28. Smith C. (1978) The effect of inflation and form of investment on the estimated value of genetic improvement in farm livestock. Animal Production 26, 101-110.
29. Systat (1996) Systat for Windows. Statistics. Version 6.0. SPSS, Chicago.
30. Tave D. & Smitherman R.O. (1980) Predicted response to selection from early growth in Tilapia nilotica. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 109, 439-445.
31. Teichert-Coddington D.R. & Smitherman R.O. (1988) Lack of response by Tilapia nilotica to mass selection for rapid early growth. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 117, 297-300.
32. Wohlfarth G.W. & Moav R. (1970) The effects of variation in spawning time on subsequent relative growth rate and viability in carp. Bamidgeh Bulletin of Fish Culture in Israel 22, 42-47.
33. Wohlfarth G.W. & Moav R. (1991) Genetic testing of common carp in cages. 1. Communal versus separate testing. Aquaculture 95, 215-223.
34. Wohlfarth G.W. Moav R. & Hulata G. (1986) Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of common carp. 5. Differential adaptation to manure and artificial feeds. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 72, 88-97.