Design process error-proofing: Engineering peer review lessons from NASA

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 2004, Pages 793-803

  Chao, Lawrence P ^a   Tumer, Irem ^b   Ishii, Kosuke ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Design review; Error proofing; Gate; Peer

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING; DESIGN; ERRORS; INFORMATION USE;

DESIGN REVIEW; ERROR-PROOFING; GATE; PEER; DESIGN-PROCESS; PEER REVIEW; PROCESS ERRORS; PROGRAMMATICS; PROJECT REVIEW; TECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

PROCESS CONTROL; NASA;

EID: 14044279973     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2004-57764     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Chao, L.P., and Ishii, K. 2004, "Design Process Error-Proofing: Project Quality Function Deployment," Proceedings of the ASME DETC: DFM, Salt Lake City, UT.
2. Chao, L.P., and Ishii, K. 2003. "Design Process Error-Proofing: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis of the Design Process," Proceedings of the ASME DETC: DFM, Chicago, IL. (BEST PAPER)
3. Chao, L.P., and Ishii, K. 2003. "Design Process Error-Proofing: Development of Automated Error-Proofing Information Systems," Proceedings of the ASME DETC: DAC, Chicago, IL.
4. Chao, L.P., Beiter, K., and Ishii, K. 2001. "Design Process Error-Proofing: International Industry Survey and Research Roadmap," Proceedings of the ASME DETC: DFM, Pittsburgh, PA.
5. Chmielewski, A.B. "Psychology of Risk Management: The ST6 Experience." NASA New Millennium Program.
6. D'Astous, P., Robillard, P.N., Detienne, F., and Visser, W. 2001. "Quantitative Measurements of the Influence of Participant Roles during Peer Review Meetings." Empirical Software Engineering. 6. 2001: 143-159.
7. Dorner, D. 1996. The Logic of Failure. Perseus Books. Cambridge, MA.
8. Eibeck, P. 1996. "Criteria for Peer-Review of Engineering Courseware on the NEEDS Database." IEEE Transactions on Education. Vol. 39, No. 3, August.
9. Eschenbach, E.A. 2001. "Improving technical writing via web-based peer review of final reports." Frontiers in Education Conference, 31st Annual, Volume 2, 10-13 October: F3A. Vol.2.
10. Freedman, D.P. and Weinberg, G.M. 1996, Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections, and Technical Reviews. Third Edition. Dorset House Publishing, New York.
11. Friedman, J.R., 1997. "An experiment in processing electronic documents," Professional Communication Conference, 1997. IPCC '97 Proceedings. 'Crossroads in Communication', IEEE International, 22-25 Oct. 1997: 193 -201
12. Gehringer, E.F. 2000. "Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review," Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE 2000). 30th Annual, Volume 1, 18-21 Oct. 2000: F1B/2 -F1B/7.
13. Huber, T.E., ed. 1992. "The NASA Mission Design Process." NASA Engineering Management Council. 22 Dec. 1992.
14. Ichida, T., ed. Product Design Review. Productivity Press. Portland, Oregon. 1996.
15. Leveson, N.G. 2000. "Intent Specifications: An Approach to Building Human-Centered Specifications." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Vol.26. No.1, January.
16. Liu, E.Z.F., Lin, S.S.J., Chiu, C.H., and Yuan, S.M. 2001. "Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer," IEEE Transactions on Education, Volume 44, Issue 3, August: 246-251.
17. O'Reilly, J. 2002. "Risk, adventure and the tyranny of peer review." Engineering Science and Education Journal. December: 251-253.
18. Quinn, J. 1994. "Flight P/FR's and the Design Review Process." JPL. D-11381.
19. Rose, J. 2003. "Project Reviews (D-10401), Rev. B." JPL Rules! DocID 35163. April 23.
20. Trenner, L. 1995. "Prototyping for usability: the benefits of peer group review." IEEE Colloquium on Integrating HCI in the Lifecycle, London, UK. April 11.
21. Wertz, J.R., and Larson, W.J. 1999. Space Mission Analysis and Design, Third Edition. Microcosm Press, E1 Segundo, California.
22. Weyuker, E.J. 1999. "Predicting project risk from architecture reviews, "Software Metrics Symposium, 1999. Proceedings. Sixth International, 4-6 November: 82 -90
23. Software V&V http://ase.arc.nasa.gov/vvivhm/reports/FinalNASAReport1. htm
24. Management of Government Safety and Mission Assurance Surveillance Functions for NASA Contracts http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/library/displayDir.cfm? Internal ID =N_PG_8735_0002 &page name=Chp2
25. ASIC Program http://nppp.jpl.nasa.gov/asic/Sect.1.5.html#A0
26. System Management Office - Goddard Space Flight Center http://smo.gsfc.nasa.gov/project_management/pm_checklists/E ng_Peer_Review_Guidelines_and_Checklist.html
27. SOFIA http://sofia.arc.nasa.gov/Sofia/sofia.html
28. CNN.com, "Investigator worried NASA culture won't change." http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/08/01/sprj.colu.shuttle. investigation.ap- index.html
29. CNN.com, "NASA promises to break culture of silence" http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/27/sprj.colu.nasa.cu lture.ap/index.html
30. CNN.com, "NASA shakes up shuttle management." http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/03/nasa.shakeup.ap/ index.html