Pedestrian scramble signal in chinatown neighborhood of Oakland, California: An evaluation

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1878, 2004, Pages 19-26

  Bechtel, Allyson K ^a,b   MacLeod, Kara E ^a   Ragland, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Sam Schwartz Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; GROUND VEHICLES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROADS AND STREETS; SIGNALING; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

PEDESTRIAN SCRAMBLING SIGNALS; PEDESTRIAN-SCRAMBLE PHASING; TRAFFIC VOLUMES; VEHICLE TRAFFIC;

FOOTBRIDGES;

EID: 14044268079     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1878-03     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Vaziri, B. Exclusive Pedestrian Phase for the Business District Signals in Beverly Hills: 10 Years Later. Institute of Transportation Engineers. District 6 Meeting (51st, San Diego, Calif., 1998). Compendium of Technical Papers. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1998.
2. Garder, P. Pedestrian Safety at Traffic Signals: A Study Carried Out with the Help of a Traffic Conflicts Technique. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 21, No. 5, Oct. 1989, pp. 435-444.
3. Abrams, C. M., and S. A. Smith. Selection of Pedestrian Signal Phasing. Presented at 56th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1977.
4. Zaidel, D. M., and I. Hocherman. Safety of Pedestrian Crossings at Signalized Intersections. Presented at 66th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1987.
5. Zegeer, C. V., and M. J. Cynecki. Determination of Motorist Violations and Pedestrian-Related Countermeasures Related to Right-Turn-on-Red. In Transportation Research Record 1010, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 16-28.
6. Zegeer, C. V., K. S. Opiela, and M. J. Cynecki. Effects of Pedestrian Signals and Signal Timing on Pedestrian Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 847, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 62-71.
7. Marsh, D. R. Exclusive Pedestrian Control for Dunedin's Central Business District, Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand, Transportation and Traffic Engineering Group Technical Session, Proc., Technical Session of the Group Held at the Annual Conference of the IPENZ, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1982.
8. Glauz, W. D., K. M. Bauer, and D. J. Migletz. Expected Traffic Conflict Rates and Their Use in Predicting Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 1026, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 1-12.
9. Parker, M. R., Jr., and C. V. Zegeer. Traffic Conflict Techniques for Safety and Operations: Observers Manual. Report FHWA-IP-88-027. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1988.
10. Association of International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic Safety (ICTCT). The Swedish Traffic Conflict Technique, Undated. www.tft.lth.se/rapporter/Conflict1.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2003.