Requirements as a means to drive innovation - A reason-based perspective

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 2004, Pages 89-98

  Almefelt, Lars ^a   Andersson, Fredrik ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MARKETING; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCTIVITY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

AUTONOMOUS PROJECTS; DESIGN PROCESS; INDUSTRIALIZATION; REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT; 'CURRENT; CONDENSED FORM; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICES; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT; INNOVATIVE PRODUCT; LEADTIME; MANAGEMENT IS; PRODUCT VALUE; STANDARD COMPONENTS; SYSTEMATIC DESIGN METHODOLOGIES;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 14044262752     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2004-57227     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. th International Conference on Engineering Design Research for Practice (ICED'03), Stockholm, Sweden, August 19-21.
2. th International Conference on Engineering Design Research for Practice (ICED'03), Stockholm, Sweden.
3. Dougherty D., & Corse S. M. (1997). What does it take to take advantage of product innovation? In R. A. Burgelman & R. S. Rosenbloom (Eds.), Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 6: 155-190. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press Inc.
4. Dwarakanath S., & Wallace K. M. (1995). Decision-making in engineering design: Observations from design experiments. Journal of Engineering Design, 6(3): 191-206.
5. Ehrlenspiel K., & Dylla N. (1993). Experimental Investigation of Designer's Thinking: Methods and Design Procedures. Journal of Engineering Design, 4(3):201-212.
6. Fern F. E. (2001). Advanced Focus Group Research. Thousands Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
7. Hansen C. T., & Andreasen M. M. (2002). The content and nature of a design concept. Paper presented at the NordDesign 2002, Trondheim, pp. 101-110.
8. Hansen C. T., & Andreasen M. M. (2003). A Proposal for an Enhanced Design Concept Understanding. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED'03), Stockholm, Sweden, August 19-21.
9. Hauser J. R., & Clausing D. (1988). The House of Quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3):63-73.
10. Hubka V. (1987). Principles of Engineering Design. Zürich, Switzerland: Heurista.
11. Hull E., Jackson K., & Dick J. (2002). Requirements Engineering. London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
12. Kahnemann D., & Tversky A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47:263-291.
13. Kano N., Seraku N., Takahashi F., & Tsuji S. (1984). Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality. Hinshitsu (Quality), Volume 14, No. 2: 147-156 (in Japanese).
14. th International Conference on Quality Managment and Organisational Development (QMOD'01), Linköping, Sweden, September 12-14.
15. Kesselring F. (1951). Bewertung von Konstruktionen (In German). Düsseldorf, Germany: Deutscher Ingenieur-Verlag.
16. rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
17. Nordström K. A., & Ridderstråle J. (1999). Funky Business - Talent Makes Capital Dance. Stockholm, Sweden: BookHouse Publishing AB.
18. nd ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
19. Pugh S. (1990). Total design. Integrated methods for successful product engineering. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
20. Robertson S., & Robertson J. (1999). Mastering the requirements process. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.
21. Shafir E., Simonson I., & Tversky A. (2000). Reason-Based Choice. In D. Kahnemann & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, Values, and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Stevens R., Brook P., Jackson K., & Arnold S. (1998). Systems Engineering - Coping with Complexity. London, UK: Prentice-Hall.
23. Ulrich K. T., & Eppinger S. D. (2000). Product Design and Development (2nd ed.). New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Inc.
24. nd ed.): Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.