Individual organisms as units of analysis: Bayesian-clustering alternatives in population genetics

Genetical Research

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 135-143

  Mank, Judith E ^a   Avise, John C ^a  

^a University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR MARKER;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EEL; ENVIRONMENT; FROG; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HYBRID ZONE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION; POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION RESEARCH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TURTLE;

ANIMALS; ANTS; ANURA; BAYES THEOREM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EELS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; TURTLES;

EID: 14044261096     PISSN: 00166723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0016672304007190     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Avise, J. C. (2000). Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Avise, J. C. (2003). Catadromous eels of the North Atlantic: a review of molecular genetic findings relevant to natural history, population structure, speciation, and phylogeny. In Eel Biology (ed. K. Aida). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
3. Avise, J. C., Helfman, G. S., Saunders, N. C. & Hales, L. S. (1986). Mitochondrial DNA differentiation in North Atlantic eels: population genetic consequences of an unusual life history pattern. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 83, 4350-4354.
4. Avise, J. C., Nelson, W. S., Arnold, J., Koehn, R. K., Williams, G. C. & Thorsteinsson, V. (1990). The evolutionary genetic status of Icelandic eels. Evolution 44, 1254-1262.
5. Blanchong, J. A., Scribner, K. T. & Winterstein, S. R. (2002). Assignment of individuals to populations: Bayesian methods and multi-locus genotypes. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 321-329.
6. Bossart, J. L. & Prowell, D. P. (1998). Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons, and new directions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 202-206.
7. Bowcock, A. M., Ruiz-Linares, A., Tomfohrde, J., Minch, E., Kidd, J. R. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1994). High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368 455-457.
8. Cegaleski, C. C., Waits, L. P. & Anderson, N. J. (2003). Assessing population structure and gene flow in Montana wolverines ( Gulo gulo) using assignment-based approaches. Molecular Ecology 12, 2907-2918.
9. Chen, M.-H., Shao, Q.-M. & Ibrahim, J. G. (2000). Monte Carlo Methods in Bayesian Analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
10. Congdon, P. (2001). Bayesian Statistical Modeling. New York: Wiley.
11. Cornuet, J.-M., Piry, S., Luikart, G., Stoup, A. & Solignac, M. (1999). New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153, 1989-2000.
12. Cowles, M. K. & Carlin, B. P. (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, 883-904.
13. Dawson, K. J. & Belkhir, K. (2001). A Bayesian approach to the identification of panmictic populations and the assignment of individuals. Genetical Research 78, 59-77.
14. Edwards, A. W. F. (1992). Likelihood. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Estoup, A., Garnery, L., Solignac, M. & Cornuet, J.-M. (1995). Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations: hierarchical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation models. Genetics 140, 679-695.
16. Goldstein, D. B. & Schlötterer, C. (eds.) (1999). Microsatellites: Evolution and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Hartl, D. & Clark, A. G. (1997). Principles of Population Genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
18. Lamb, T. & Avise, J. C. (1986). Directional introgression of mitochondrial DNA in a hybrid population of tree frogs: the influence of mating behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 83, 2526-2530.
19. Lamb, T. & Avise, J. C. (1987). Morphological variability in genetically defined categories of anuran hybrids. Evolution 41 157-165.
20. Manel, S., Berthier, P. & Luikart, G. (2002). Detecting wildlife poaching: identifying the origin of individuals with Bayesian assignment tests and multilocus genotypes. Conservation Biology 16, 650-659.
21. Mank, J. E. & Avise, J. C. (2003). Microsatellite variation and differentiation in North Atlantic eels. Journal of Heredity 94, 310-314.
22. Mank, J. E., Carlson J. C. & Brittingham, M. C. (2004). A century of hybridization: decreasing genetic distance between American black ducks and mallards. Conservation Genetics 5, 394-403.
23. Miller, C. R., Adams, J. R. & Waits, L. P. (2003). Pedigree-based assignment tests fir reversing Coyote (Canis latrans introgression into the red wolf (Canis rufus) population. Molecular Ecology 12, 3287-3301.
24. Nei, M. (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. O'Riain, M. J., Jarvis, J. U. M. & Faukes, C. G. (1996). A dispersive morph in the naked mole-rat. Nature 380, 619-621.
26. Peakall, R. & Smouse, P. E. (2001). GenA1Ex V5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. http://www.anu.edu.au/BoZo/GenA1Ex/
27. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945-959.
28. Rosenberg, N. A., Pritchard, J. K., Weber, J. L., Cann, H. M., Kidd, K. K., Zhivotovsky, L.A. & Feldman, M. W. (2002). Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298, 2381-2385.
29. Ross, K. G. (2001). How to measure dispersal: the example of fire ants. In Causes, Consequences, and Mechanisms of Dispersal at the Individual, Population, and Community Level (ed. J. Clobert, E. Danchin, J. D. Nichols & A. Dhondt), chapter 1.3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Ross, K. G. & Shoemaker, D. D. (1997). Nuclear and mitochondrial genetic structure in two social forms of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta: insights into transitions to an alternate social organization. Heredity 78, 590-602.
31. Ross, K. G., Shoemaker, D. D., Krieger, M. J. B., DeHeer, C. J. & Keller, L. (1999). Assessing genetic structure with multiple classes of molecular markers: a case study involving the introduced fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 525-543.
32. Walker, D., Moler, P. E., Buhlmann, K. A. & Avise, J. C. (1998). Phylogeographic pattern in Kinosternon subrubrum and K. baurii based on mitochondrial DNA restriction analyses. Herpetologica 54, 174-184.
33. Wirth, T. & Bernatchez, L. (2001). Genetic evidence against panmixia in the European eels. Nature 409, 1037-1040.
34. Wirth, T. & Bernatchez, L. (2003). Decline of North Atlantic eels: a fatal synergy? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270, 681-688.
35. Wright, S. (1921). Systems of mating. Genetics 6, 111-178.