Antagonist effects of non-host fruit volatiles on discrimination of host fruit by Rhagoletis flies infesting apple (Malus pumila), hawthorn (Crataegus spp.), and flowering dogwood (Cornus florida)

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 97-105

  Linn Jr , Charles ^a   Nojima, Satoshi ^a   Roelofs, Wendell ^a  

^a New York State Agricultural Experiment Station   (United States)

Author keywords

Diptera; Flight tunnel; Host plant recognition discrimination; Monitoring; Rhagoletis pomonella species complex; Tephritidae

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; FLY; FRUIT; HOST LOCATION; HOST PLANT; ODOR; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

CORNUS; CORNUS FLORIDA; CRATAEGUS; DIPTERA; MALUS PUMILA; MALUS X DOMESTICA; RHAGOLETIS; RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA; TEPHRITIDAE;

EID: 14044256610     PISSN: 00138703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00222.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baker TC (1989) Sex pheromone communicaton in Lepidoptera: new research progress. Experientia 45: 248-262.
2. Baker TC (2002) Mechanisms for saltational shifts in pheromone communication systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 13368-13370.
3. Baker TC, Cossé AA & Todd JL (1998) Behavioral antagonism in the moth Helicoverpa zea in response to pheromone blends of three sympatric heliothine moth species is explained by one type of antennal neuron. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 855: 511-523.
4. Berlocher SH (1999) Host race or species? Allozyme characterization of the 'flowering dogwood fly', a member of the Rhagoletis pomonella complex. Heredity 83: 652-662.
5. Berlocher SH (2000) Radiation and divergence in the Rhagoletis pomonella species group: inferences from allozymes. Evolution 54: 543-557.
6. Bernays EA (2001) Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: Implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annual Review of Entomology 46: 703-727.
7. Bush GL (1966) The taxonomy, cytology, and evolution of the genus Rhagoletis. North America (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 134: 431-562.
8. Bush GL (1974) The mechanism of sympatric host race formation of the true fruit flies (Tephritidae). Evolutionary Patterns and Processes (ed. by MJD White), pp. 3-23. Academic Press, London.
9. Bush GL (1994) Sympatric speciation: New wine in old bottles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 285-288.
10. Diaz-Fleischer F & Aluja M (1999) Behavior of tephritid flies: A historical perspective. Fruit Flies: Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior (ed. by M Aluja & AL Norrbom), pp. 39-71. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
11. Linn CE Jr, Du JW, Hammond A & Roelofs WL (1987) Identification of unique pheromone components for the soybean looper moth, Pseudoplusia includens. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 1351-1360.
12. Duan JJ & Prokopy RJ (1992) Visual and odor stimuli influencing effectiveness of sticky spheres for trapping apple maggot flies Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 113: 271-279.
13. Feder JL (1998) The apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella: flies in the face of conventional wisdom? Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (ed. by DJ Howard & SH Berlocher), pp. 130-144. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Feder JL, Berlocher SH & Opp SB (1998) Sympatric host-race formation and speciation, Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae): A tale of two species for Charles D. Genetic Structure and Local Adaptation in Natural Insect Populations (ed. by S Mopper & SY Strauss), pp. 408-441. Chapman & Hall, New York.
15. Feder JL & Bush GL (1989) A field test of differential host-plant usage between two sibling species of Rhagoletis pomonella fruit flies and its consequences for sympatric models of speciation. Evolution 43: 1813-1819.
16. Feder JL, Chilcote CA & Bush GL (1988) Genetic differentiation between sympatric host races of Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature 336: 61-64.
17. Feder JL, Chilcote CA & Bush GL (1990) Geographic pattern of genetic differentiation between host associated populations of Rhagoletis pomonella in the eastern United States and Canada. Evolution 44: 570-594.
18. Feder JL, Opp SB, Wlazlo B, Reynolds KW, Go W & Spisak S (1994) Host fidelity is an effective pre-mating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91: 7990-7994.
19. Fein BL, Reissig WH & Roelofs WL (1982) Identification of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot. Journal of Chemical Ecology 8: 1473-1487.
20. Fletcher BS & Prokopy RI (1991) Host location and oviposition in tephritid fruit flies. Reproductive Behavior of Insects: Individuals and Populations (ed. by WJ Bailey & J Ridsdill-Smith), pp. 139-171. Chapman & Hall, London.
21. Grant AJ, O'Connell RJ & Hammond AM (1988) A comparative study of pheromone perception in two species of noctuid moths. Journal of Insect Behavior 1: 75-96.
22. Linn CE Jr, Du JW, Bjostad LB, & Roelofs WL (1984) Redundancy in a chemical signal: Behavioral responses of male Trichoplusia ni to a 6-component sex pheromone blend. Journal of Chemical Ecology 10: 1635-1658.
23. Linn CE Jr, Du JW, Hammond A & Roelofs WL (1988) Specificity of male response to multicomponent pheromones in the noctuid moths Trichoplusia ni and Pseudoplusia includens. Journal of Chemical Ecology 14: 47-57.
24. Linn CE Jr, Feder JL, Nojima S, Dambroski HR, Berlocher SH & Roelofs WL (2003) Fruit odor discrimination and sympatric host race formation in Rhagoletis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100: 11490-11493.
25. Linn CE Jr & Roelofs WL (1995) Pheromone communication in the moths and its role in the speciation process. Speciation and the Recognition Concept: Theory and Application (ed. by DH Lambert & H Spencer), pp. 263-300. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
26. Luna IG & Prokopy RJ (1995) Behavioral differences between hawthorn-origin and apple-origin Rhagoletis pomonella flies in patches of host trees. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 74: 277-282.
27. McPheron BA, Smith DC & Berlocher SH (1988) Genetic differences between Rhagoletis pomonella host races. Nature 336: 64-66.
28. Moericke V, Prokopy RJ, Berlocher SH & Bush GL (1975) Visual stimuli eliciting attraction of Rhagoletis pomonella flies to trees. Entomologia Experimental et Applicata 18: 497-507.
29. Neilson WTA & McAllen JW (1965) Artificial diets for the apple maggot. III. Improved, defined diets. Journal of Economic Entomology 58: 542-543.
30. Nojima S, Linn CE Jr & Roelofs WL (2003b) Identification of host fruit volatiles from flowering dogwood (Cornus florida) attractive to dogwood-origin Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 2347-2357.
31. Nojima S, Linn CE Jr, Zhang A, Morris B & Roelofs WL (2003a) Identification of host fruit volatiles from hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) attractive to hawthorn-origin Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 319-334.
32. Owens ED & Prokopy RJ (1986) Relationship between reflectance spectra of host plant surfaces and visual detection of host fruit by Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Physiological Entomology 11: 297-307.
33. Prokopy RJ (1968) Visual responses of apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae): orchard studies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 11: 403-422.
34. Prokopy RJ (2002) Two decades of bottom-up, ecologically based pest management in a small commercial apple orchard in Massachusetts. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 1959: 1-11.
35. Prokopy RJ, Diehl SR & Cooley SS (1988) Behavioral evidence for host races in Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Oecologia 76: 138-147.
36. Zhang A, Linn CE Jr, Wright S, Prokopy RJ, Reissig WH & Roelofs WL (1999) Identification of a new blend of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 1221-1232.