The clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with central nervous system anomalies on ultrasound scan

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 29-35

  Blaicher, Wibke ^a,b,d   Prayer, D ^c   Mittermayer, C ^a,b   Weninger, R ^d   Birnbacher, R ^d   Deutinger, J ^a,b   Bernaschek, G ^a,b  

^a Div of Prenatal Diagn and Therapy   (Austria)

^b LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR LUNG VASCULAR RESEARCH   (Austria)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Central nervous system anomalies; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prenatal diagnosis; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS MALFORMATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARENT COUNSELING; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CEREBRAL VENTRICLES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROCEPHALUS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 14044253483     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813382     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Pilu G, Falco P, Perolo A et al. Differential diagnosis and outcome of fetal intracranial hypoechoic lesions: report of 21 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 229-236
2. Poutamo J, Vanninen R, Partanen K et al. Magnetic resonance imaging supplements ultrasonographic imaging of the posterior fossa, pharynx and neck in malformed fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 327-334
3. Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen JR et al. Fetal central nervous system anomalies: MR imaging augments sonographic diagnosis. Radiology 1997; 204: 635-642
4. Coakley FV, Hricak H, Filly RA et al. Complex fetal disorders: Effect of MR imaging on management - preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 1999; 213: 691-696
5. Levine D, Barnes PD, Edelmann RR. Obstetric MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 211: 609-617
6. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Transvaginal fetal neurosonography: standardization of the planes and sections by anatomic landmarks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 42-47
7. Goh RH, Somers S, Jurriaans E et al. Magnetic resonance imaging. Application to family practice. Can Fam Physician 1999; 45: 2118-2128
8. Whitby E, Paley MN, Davies N et al. Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of central nervous system abnormalities in utero in the second and third trimester of pregnancy: comparison with ultrasound. BJOG 2001; 108: 519-526
9. Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen JR et al. Central nervous system abnormalities assessed with prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 1011-1019
10. Simon EM, Goldstein RB, Coakley FV et al. Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero. AJNR 2000; 21: 1688-1698
11. Olutoye OO, Adzick NS. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Semin Perinatol 1999; 23: 462-473
12. Coakley FV. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in fetal surgery. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 12: 39-51
13. Hata T, Yanagihara T, Matsumoto M et al. Three-dimensional sonographic features of fetal central nervous system anomaly. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 635-639
14. Schierlitz L, Dumanli H, Robinson JN et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of fetal brains. Lancet 2001; 357: 1177-1178