Early one-stage closure in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome: Fascial replacement with human acellular dermis and bipedicle flaps

American Surgeon

Volumn 69, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1025-1028

  Guy, Jeffrey S ^a   Miller, Richard ^a   Morris Jr , John A ^a   Diaz, Jose ^a   May, Addison ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL COMPARTMENT SYNDROME; ABDOMINAL INJURY; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FASCIA; FEMALE; FISTULA; HEMATOMA; HERNIA; HUMAN; MALE; PEDICLED SKIN FLAP; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SOFT TISSUE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND INFECTION;

ABDOMINAL MUSCLES; ADULT; AGED; COMPARTMENT SYNDROMES; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 14044251863     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Pritchard FE, et al. Planned ventral hernia. Staged, management for acute abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg 1994;219:643-50; discussion 651-3.
2. Law NW. A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglycolic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects. Acta Chir Scand 1990;156:759-62.
3. Bleichrodt RP, Simmermacher RK, van der Lei B, et al. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176:18-24.
4. Disa JJ, Chiaramonte MF, Girotto JA, et al. Advantages of autologous fascia versus synthetic patch abdominal reconstruction in experimental animal defects [in process citation]. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:2086-7.
5. Disa JJ, Goldberg NH, Carlton JM, et al. Restoring abdominal wall integrity in contaminated tissue-deficient wounds using autologous fascia grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:979-86.
6. Disa JJ, Klein MH, Goldberg NH. Advantages of autologous fascia versus synthetic patch abdominal reconstruction in experimental animal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97:801-6.
7. Berberoglu U, Alagol H. Reconstruction of a chest-wall defect with dehydrated human dura mater graft. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;41:133-4.
8. Root M, Lockhart JL, Vorstman A, et al. Long-term followup with the use of lyophilized dura mater for abdominal wall closure in children: Report of 3 cases. J Urol 1992;148:858-60.
9. Takahashi M, Ono K, Wakakuwa R, et al. The use of a human dura mater allograft for the repair of a contaminated abdominal wall defect: Report of a case. Surg Today 1994;24:468-72.
10. Schier F, Danzer E, Bondartschuk M. Hyaluronate, tetrachlorodecaoxide, and galactolipid prevent adhesions after implantation of Gore-Tex and dura mater into the abdominal wall in rats. Pediatr Surg Int 1999;15:255-9.
11. Lattari V, Jones LM, Varcelotti JR, et al. The use of a permanent dermal allograft in full-thickness bums of the hand and foot: A report of three cases. J Burn Care Rehabil 1997;18:147-55.
12. Sheridan R, Choucair R, Donelan M, et al. Acellular allodermis in burns surgery: 1-year results of a pilot trial. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998;19:528-30.
13. Tsai CC, Lin SD, Lai CS, et al. The use of composite acellular allodermis-ultrathin autograft on joint area in major burn patients-One year follow-up. Kao-Hsiung i Hsueh Ko Hsueh Tsa Chih [Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences] 1999;15:651-8.
14. Warren WL, Medary MB, Dureza CD, et al. Dural repair using acellular human dermis: Experience with 200 cases: Technique assessment. Neurosurgery 2000;46:1391-6.
15. Chaplin JM, Costantino RD, Wolpoe ME, et al. Use of an acellular dermal allograft for dural replacement: An experimental study. Neurosurgery 1999;45:320-7.
16. Shorr N, Perry JD, Goldberg RA, et al. The safety and applications of acellular human dermal allograft in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery: A preliminary report. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;16:223-30.
17. Rubin PA, Fay AM, Remulla HD, et al. Ophthalmic plastic applications of acellular dermal allografts. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2091-7.
18. Dubin MG, Feldman M, Ibrahim HZ, et al. Allograft dermal implant (AlloDerm) in a previously irradiated field. Laryngoscope 2000;110:934-7.
19. Crook K. The use of Alloderm and allograft to augment a mandibular arch for implant development. New Mexico Dental Journal 1990;50:22-4.
20. Sclafani AP, Romo T, 3rd, Jacono AA, et al. Evaluation of acellular dermal graft in sheet (AlloDerm) and injectable (micronized AlloDerm) forms for soft tissue augmentation. Clinical observations and histological analysis. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery 2000;2:130-6.
21. Jones FR, Schwartz BM, Silverstein P. Use of a nonimmunogenic acellular dermal allograft for soft-tissue augmentation: A preliminary report. Aesthet Surg Q 1996;16:196-201.
22. Hein KD, Morris DJ, Goldwyn RM, et al. Dermal autografts for fascial repair after TRAM flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:2287-92.
23. Choe JM, Kothandapani R, James L, et al. Autologous, cadaveric, and synthetic materials used in sling surgery: Comparative biomechanical analysis. Urology 2001;58:482-6.