Judicious use of multiple hypothesis tests

Conservation Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 261-267

  Roback, Paul J ^a   Askins, Robert A ^b  

^a ST OLAF COLLEGE   (United States)

^b The Holleran Center for Community Action and Public Policy   (United States)

Author keywords

Bonferroni method; False discovery rate; Holm's method; Hypothesis generation; Multiple hypothesis testing; q value

Indexed keywords

BIRD; CONSERVATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING;

AVES;

EID: 14044250928     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00269.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Basford, K. E., and J. W. Tukey. 1997. Graphical profiles as an aid to understanding plant breeding experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 57:93-107.
2. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57:289-300.
3. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 2000. On adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 25:60-83.
4. Benjamini, Y., and W. Liu. 1999. A step-down multiple hypotheses testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate under independence. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 82:163-170.
5. Benjamini, Y., and D. Yekutieli. 2001. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics 29:1165-1188.
6. Benjamini, Y., D. Drai, G. Elmer, N. Kafkafi, and I. Golani. 2001. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behavioural Brain Research 125:279-284.
7. Cobb, G. 1998. Introduction to the design and analysis of experiments. Key College Publishing, Emeryville, California.
8. Crabbe, J. C., D. Wahlsten, and B. C. Dudek. 1999. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284:1670-1672.
9. Food and Drug Administration. 1998. Guidance for industry: E9 statistical principles for clinical trials. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Rockville, Maryland.
10. Hochberg, Y. 1988. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75:800-802.
11. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6:65-70.
12. Hommel, G. 1988. A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75:383-386.
13. Kurosawa, R., and R. A. Askins. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds in deciduous forests in Japan. Conservation Biology 17:695-707.
14. Ornithological Society of Japan. 2000. Check-list of Japanese birds. 6th edition. Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan.
15. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
16. Saville, D. J. 1990. Multiple comparison procedures: the practical solution. American Statistician 44:174-180.
17. Shaffer, J. P. 1995. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology 46:561-584.
18. Simes, R. J. 1986. An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73:751-754.
19. Storey, J. D. 2002. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 64:479-498.
20. Storey, J. D. 2003. The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Annals of Statistics 31:2013-2035.
21. Storey, J. D., and R. Tibshirani. 2001. Estimating false discovery rates under dependence, with applications to DNA microarrays. Technical report 2001-28. Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
22. Storey, J. D., and R. Tibshirani. 2003. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100:9440-9445.
23. Storey, J. D. J. E. Taylor, and D. Siegmund. 2004. Strong control, conservative point estimation, and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 66:187-205.
24. Tukey, J. W. 1991. The philosophy of multiple comparisons. Statistical Science 6:100-116.
25. Weller, J. I., J. Z. Song, D. W. Heyen, H. A. Lewin, and M. Ron. 1998. A new approach to the problem of multiple comparisons in the genetic dissection of complex traits. Genetics 150:1699-1706.
26. Williams, V. S. L., L. V. Jones, and J. W. Tukey. 1999. Controlling error in multiple comparisons, with examples from state-to-state differences in educational achievement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24:42-69.
27. Wright, S. P. 1992. Adjusted P-values for simultaneous inference. Biometrics 48:1005-1013.