Principlism and moral dilemmas: A new principle

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 101-105

  DeMarco, J P ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CONFLICT; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; LITERATURE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PROBLEM SOLVING; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; JEHOVAH'S WITNESS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; REVIEW; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

BLOOD TRANSFUSION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 13944282640     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.007856     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. In effect, this paper serves as a response to the second part of Raanon Gillon's two part challenge, to find a new principle for principlism: Ethics needs principles - four can encompass the rest - and respect for autonomy should be "first among equals". J Med Ethics 2003;29:308.
2. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
3. See reference 2:18.
4. Ross W. Foundations of ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939.
5. Fox R, DeMarco J. The immorality of promising. Buffalo, NY: Humanity Press, 2000.
6. McConnell T. Moral dilemmas and consistency in ethics. Can J Philos 1978;8:269-87.
7. Lemmon E. Moral dilemmas. Philos Rev 1962;70 150.
8. See reference 6: 276. Although I borrow this example from McConnell, in general he denies that there are conflicting actual obligations except possibly those caused by the agent him or hersel.
9. The derived obligation of the mutuality principle is similar to a rule very briefly presented by Ruth Barcan Marcus: "strive to arrange [one's] own life and encourage social arrangements that would prevent, to the extent that it is possible, future conflicts from arising." Moral dilemmas and consistency. J Philos 1980; 77 133.
10. Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
11. See reference 10:78.
12. Jansen A, Siegler M, Winslade W. Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co, 1982.
13. Gillon R. Four scenarios. J Med Ethics 2003;29 267.
14. Beauchamp T. Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics 2003;29:270.
15. See reference 14:271.
16. See reference 2:406.
17. Ruth Macklin's analysis comes to a similar result. Applying the four principles. J Med Ethics 2003;29:275-80.
18. See reference 2:167.
19. See reference 2:410.
20. See reference 2:17.
21. Richardson H. Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems. Philos Public Affairs 1990; 19:302.
22. Gardiner P. A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine. J Med Ethics 2003;29:299-300.
23. See reference 22:300.
24. Sommerville A. Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions. J Med Ethics 2003; 29 285.
25. Re R (minor) [1993], 15 BMLR, 72.
26. See reference 24:285.
27. See reference 2:20.