On atomic force microscopy and the constitutive behavior of living cells

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 75-84

  Na, S ^a   Sun, Z ^b   Meininger, G A ^b   Humphrey, J D ^a  

^a Texas A M University   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INDENTATION; LIFE CYCLE; PROFILOMETRY; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY;

CYTOSKELETON; LIVING CELLS; MECHANICAL LOADING; RANDOM DISTRIBUTION;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOMECHANICS; CELL ADHESION; CYTOSKELETON; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BIOMECHANICS; CELL ADHESION; CYTOSKELETON; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE;

EID: 13944266740     PISSN: 16177959     EISSN: 16822978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-004-0051-x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (2002) Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Science, New York
2. Beatty MF, Usmani SA (1975) On the indentation of a highly elastic half-space. Q J Mech Appl Math 28:47-62
3. Briscoe BJ, Sebastian KS, Adams MJ (1994) The effect of indenter geometry on the elastic response to indentation. J Phys D Appl Phys 27:1156-1162
4. Brodland GW, Gordon R (1990) Intermediate filaments may prevent buckling of compressively loaded microtubules. ASME J Biomech Eng 112:319-321
5. Cheng Y, Hartemink CA, Hartwig JH, Dewey CF (2000) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the actin cytoskeleton from stereo images. J Biomech 33:105-113
6. Costa KD, Yin FCP (1999) Analysis of indentation: implications for measuring mechanical properties with atomic force microscopy. ASME J Biomech Eng 121:462-471
7. Fisher NI, Lewis T, Embleton BJJ (1987) Statistical analysis of spherical data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
8. Fung YC (2002) Celebrating the inauguration of the journal: biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 1:3-4
9. Green AE, Rivlin RS, Shield RT (1952) General theory of small elastic deformations superimposed on finite elastic deformations. Proc R Soc Lond 211A:128-154
10. Heidemann SR, Kaech S, Buxbaum RE, Matus A (1999) Direct observations of the mechanical behaviors of cytoskeleton in living fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 145:109-122
11. Herant M, Marganski WA, Dembo M (2003) The mechanics of neutrophils: synthetic modeling of three experiments. Biophys J 84:3389-3413
12. Humphrey JD (2002a) On mechanical modeling of dynamic changes in the structure and properties of adherent cells. Math Mech Sol 7:521-539
13. Humphrey JD (2002b) Cardiovascular solid mechanics: cells, tissues, and organs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
14. Humphrey JD, Yin FCP (1987) A new constitutive formulation for characterizing the mechanical behavior of soft tissues. Biophys J 52:563-570
15. Humphrey JD, Halperin HR, Yin FCP (1991) Small indentation superimposed on a finite equibiaxial stretch: implications for cardiac mechanics. ASME J Appl Mech 58:1108-1111
16. Janmey PA, Euteneuer U, Traub P, Schliwa M (1991) Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks. J Cell Biol 113:155-160
17. Lanir Y (1983) Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J Biomech 12:423-436
18. Liu X, Pollack GH (2002) Mechanics of F-actin characterized with microfabricated cantilevers. Biophys J 83:2705-2715
19. Mathur AB, Collinsworth AM, Reichert WM, Krauss WE, Truskey G A (2001) Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J Biomech 34:1545-1553
20. Miyazaki H, Hayashi K (1999) Atomic force microscopic measurement of the mechanical properties of intact endothelial cells in fresh arteries. Med Biol Eng Comput 37:530-536
21. Radmacher M, Tillmann RW, Fritz M, Gaub HE (1992) From molecules to cells: imaging soft samples with the atomic force microscope. Science 257:1900-1904
22. Rajagopal KR, Tao L (1995) Mechanics of mixtures. World Scientific, Singapore
23. Rotsch C, Radmacher M (2000) Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys J 78:520-535
24. Sato M, Nagayama K, Kataoka N, Sasaki M, Hane K (2000) Local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for cultured bovine endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. J Biomech 33:127-135
25. Sneddon IN (1965) The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci 3:47-57
26. Stamenovic D, Ingber D (2002) Models of cytoskeletal mechanics of adherent cells. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 1:95-108
27. Treloar LRG (1975) The physics of rubber elasticity. Clarendon Press, Oxford
28. Truesdell C, Noll W (1965) The non-linear field theories of mechanics. In: Flugge S (ed) Handbuch der Physik, Vol III/3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
29. Wakatsuki T, Kolodney MS, Zahalak GI, Elson EL (2000) Cell mechanics studied by a reconstituted model tissue. Biophys J 79:2353-2368
30. Wu HW, Kuhn T, Moy VT (1998) Mechanical properties of L929 cells measured by atomic force microscopy: effects of anticytoskeletal drugs and membrane crosslinking. Scanning 20:389-397
31. Zhu C, Bao G, Wang N (2000) Cell mechanics: mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2: 189-226