Distribution of different morphologic types of subgingival calculus on proximal root surfaces

Quintessence International

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 202-208

  Gürgan, Cem A ^a   Bilgin, Evren ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dental calculus; Incisor; Premolar; Tooth root

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; FEMALE; GINGIVA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCISOR; MAGNIFICATION RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PERIODONTITIS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CALCULUS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH ROOT;

ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL CALCULUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 13944254010     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Mandel ID, Gaffar A. Calculus revisited: A review. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:249-257.
2. Carranza FA. Dental calculus. In: Carranza FA, Newman MG (eds). Clinical Periodontology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996:150-160.
3. Lang NP, Mombelli A, Attström R. Dental plaque and calculus. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP (eds). Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1998:102-137.
4. Corbett TL, Dawes C. A comparison of the site-specificity of supragingival and subgingival calculus deposition. J Periodontol 1998;69:1-8.
5. Roberts-Harry EA, Clerehugh V. Subgingival calculus: Where are we now? A comparative review. J Dent 2000;28:93-102.
6. Everett FG, Potter GR. Morphology of submarginal calculus. J Periodontol 1959;30:27-31.
7. Roberts-Harry EA, Clerehugh V, Shore RC, Kirkham J, Robinson C. Morphology and elemental composition of subgingival calculus in two ethnic groups. J Periodontol 2000;71:1401-1411.
8. Richardson AC, Chadroff B, Bowers GM. The apical location of calculus within the intrabony defect. J Periodontol 1990;61:118-122.
9. Clerehugh V, Abdeia R, Hull PS.The effect of subgingival calculus on the validity of clinical probing measurements. J Dent 1996;24:329-333.
10. Sherman PR, Hutchens LH, Jewson LG, Moriarty JM, Greco GW, McFall WT. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing. (I) Clinical detection of residual calculus. J Periodontol 1990;61:3-8.
11. Kepic TJ, O'Leary TJ, Kafrawy AH. Total calculus removal: An attainable objective? J Periodontol 1990;61:16-20.
12. Aoki A, Miura M, Akiyama F, et al. In vitro evaluation of Er:YAG laser scaling of subgingival calculus in comparison with ultrasonic scaling. J Periodontal Res 2000;35:266-277.
13. Kocher T, Langenbeck M, Ruhling A, Plagmann HC. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:243-249.