Phylogenetic trends in the abundance and distribution of pit organs of elasmobranchs

Acta Zoologica

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 233-244

  Peach, M B ^a   Rouse, G W ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Elasmobranch; Evolution; Lateral line; Neuromast; Pit organ; Sensory fish

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; FISH; PHYLOGENY; SENSORY SYSTEM;

CHONDRICHTHYES; ELASMOBRANCHII;

EID: 13844310164     PISSN: 00017272     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-7272.2004.00176.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allis, E. P. 1902. The lateral sensory canals, the eye-muscles, and the peripheral distribution of certain of the cranial nerves of Mustelus laevis. - Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 45: 87-236.
2. Budker, P. 1938. Les cryptes sensorielles et les denticules cutanés des plagiostomes. - Annales de l'Institut Océanographique 18: 207-288.
3. Budker, P. 1944. Sur les cryptes sensorielles de Stegostoma varium (Seba). - Bulletin Du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle 16: 166-173.
4. Butler, P. J. 1999. Respiratory system. In Hamlett, W. C. (Ed.): Sharks, Skates and Rays: the Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes, pp. 174-197. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
5. de Carvalho, M. R. 1996. Higher-level elasmobranch phylogeny, basal squaleans, and paraphyly. In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. and Johnson, G. D. (Eds): Interrelationships of Fishes, pp. 35-62. Academic Press, San Diego.
6. Compagno, L. J. V. 1973. Interrelationships of living elasmobranchs. - Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society 53: 15-61.
7. Compagno, L. J. V. 1977. Phyletic relationships of living sharks and rays. - American Zoologist 17: 303-322.
8. Compagno, L. J. V. 1999a. Checklist of living elasmobranchs. In Hamlett, W. C. (Ed.): Sharks, Skates and Rays: the Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes, pp. 471-498. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
9. Compagno, L. J. V. 1999b. Systematics and body form. In Hamlett, W. C. (Ed.): Sharks, Skates and Rays: the Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes, pp. 1-42. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
10. Daniel, J. F. 1934. The Elasmobranch Fishes. University of California Press, Berkeley.
11. Disler, N. N. 1977. LateralViews of the Arrangement of the Sense Organs of Sharks. Hakya (Science Publications), Moscow (in Russian).
12. Douady, C. J., Dosay, M., Shivji, M. S. and Stanhope, M. J. 2003. Molecular phylogenetic evidence refuting the hypothesis of Batoidea (rays and skates) as derived sharks. - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 215-221.
13. Dunn, K. A. and Morrissey, J. F. 1995. Molecular phylogeny of elasmobranchs. - Copeia 18: 526-531.
14. Ewart, J. C. 1892. The lateral sense organs of elasmobranchs. I. The sensory canals of Laemargus. - Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 37: 59-86.
15. Ewart, J. C. and Mitchell, J. C. 1892. On the lateral sense organs of elasmobranchs. I. The sensory canals of the common skate (Raia batis). - Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 37: 87-105.
16. Fulgosi, F. C. and Gandolfi, G. 1983. Re-description of the external morphology of Somniosus rostratus (Risso, 1826), with special reference to its squamation and cutateous sensory organs, and aspects of their functional morphology (Pisces Selachii Squalidae). - Monitore Zoologico Italiano 17: 17-70.
17. Garman, S. 1888. On the lateral canal system of the Selachia and Holocephala. - Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 17: 57-119.
18. Garrick, J. A. F. 1960. Studies on New Zealand Elasmobranchii. - Part X. The genus Echinorhinus, with an account of a second species, E. cookei Pietschmann, 1928, from New Zealand waters. - Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 88: 105-117.
19. Grandcolas, P., Deleporte, P., Desutter-Grandcolas, L. and Daugeron, C. 2001. Phylogenetics and ecology: as many characters as possible should be included in the cladistic analysis. - Cladistics 17: 104-110.
20. Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Hawkes, O. A. M. 1906. The cranial and spinal nerves of Chlamydoselachus anguineus (Gar.). - Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1906: 959-991.
22. Johnson, S. E. 1917. Structure and development of the sense organs of the lateral canal system of selachians (Mustelus canis and Squalus acanthius). - Journal of Comparative Neurology 28: 1-74.
23. Last, P. R. and Stevens, J. D. 1994. Sharks and Rays of Australia. CSIRO Australia.
24. Lawson, R., Burch, S. J., Oughterson, S. M., Heath, S. and Davies, D. H. 1995. Evolutionary relationships of cartilaginous fishes: an immunological study. - Journal of Zoology (London) 237: 101-106.
25. Lorch, P. D. and McEadie, J. A. 1999. Power of the concentrated changes test for correlated evolution. - Systematic Biology 48: 170-191.
26. Luckow, M. and Bruneau, A. 1997. Circularity and independence in phylogenetic tests of ecological hypotheses. - Cladistics 13: 145-151.
27. Maddison, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? - Evolution 44: 539-557.
28. Martins, E. P. and Hansen, T. F. 1996. The statistical analysis of interspecific data: a review and evaluation of phylogenetic comparative methods. In Martins, E. P. (Ed.): Phytogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior., pp. 22-75. Oxford University Press, New York.
29. Maruska, K. P. 2001. Morphology of the mechanosensory lateral line system in elasmobranch fishes: ecological and behavioral considerations. - Environmental Biology of Fishes 60: 47-75.
30. Maruska, K. P. and Tricas, T. C. 1998. Morphology of the mechanosensory lateral line system in the Atlantic stingray, Dasyatis sabina: the mechanotactile hypothesis. - Journal of Morphology 238: 1-22.
31. McEachran, J. D. and Dunn, K. A. and Miyake, T. 1996. Interrelationships of the batoid fishes (Chondrichthyes: Batoidea). In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. and Johnson, G. D. (Eds): Interrelationships of Fishes, pp. 63-84. Academic Press, San Diego.
32. Naylor, G. J. P. 1992. The phylogenetic relationships among requiem and hammerhead sharks: inferring phylogeny when thousands of equally most parsimonious trees result. - Cladistics 8: 295-318.
33. Norris, H. W. and Hughes, S. P. 1920. The cranial, occipital and anterior spinal nerves of the dogfish (Squalus acanthius). - Journal of Comparative Neurology 31: 293-402.
34. Northcutt, R. G. 1989. The phylogenetic distribution and innervation of craniate mechanoreceptive lateral lines. In Coombs, S., Görner, P. and Münz, H. (Eds): The Mechanosensory Lateral Line: Neurobiology and Evolution, pp. 17-78. Springer-Verlag, New York.
35. Peach, M. B. 2001. The pit organs of elasmobranchs - their structure, distribution, evolution and roles in behaviour. PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.
36. Peach, M. B. 2003. Inter- and intraspecific variation in the distribution and abundance of pit organs (free neuromasts) on sharks and rays. - Journal of Morphology 256: 89-102.
37. Peach, M. B. and Marshall, N. J. 2000. The pit organs of elasmobranchs: a review. - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 355: 1131-1134.
38. Peach, M. B. and Rouse, G. W. 2000. The morphology of the pit organs and lateral line canal neuromasts of Mustelus antarcticus (Chondrichthyes: Triakidae). - Journal of the Marine Biology Association of the UK 80: 155-162.
39. eme Série 8: 334-336.
40. Petit, G. and Budker, P. 1936b. Contribution à l'étude de la différentiation des dents cutanées, liée à la présence de cryptes sensorielles, chez quelques espèces de Sélaciens. - Bulletin de l'Institut Océanographique, Monaco 695: 1-46.
41. de Pinna, M. C. C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. - Cladistics 7: 367-394.
42. Pleijel, F. 1995. On character coding for phylogeny reconstruction. - Cladistics 11: 309-315.
43. Proctor, H. C. 1996. Behavioral characters and homoplasy: perception versus practice. In Sanderson, M. J. and Hufford, L. (Eds): Homoplasy: the Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution, pp. 131-149. Academic Press, San Diego.
44. Reif, W. E. 1982. Morphogenesis and function of the squamation in sharks. - Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 164: 172-183.
45. Reif, W. E. 1985. Squamation and ecology of sharks. - Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 78: 1-255.
46. Ruud, G. 1920. Über hautsinnesorgane bei Spinax niger Bon. II. Die embryologische entwicklung. - Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere 41: 459-546.
47. Shirai, S. 1996. Phylogenetic interrelationships of neoselachians (Chondrichthyes: Euselachii). In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. and Johnson, G. D. (Eds): Interrelationships of Fishes, pp. 9-34. Academic Press, San Diego.
48. Tester, A. L. and Kendall, J. I. 1967. Innervation of free and canal neuromasts in the sharks Carcharhinus menisorrah and Sphyrna lewini. In Cahn, P. (Ed.): Lateral Line Detectors, pp. 53-69. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
49. Tester, A. L. and Nelson, G. J. 1967. Free neuromasts (pit organs) in sharks. In Gilbert, P. W., Mathewson, R. F. and Rall, D. P. (Eds): Sharks, Skates and Rays, pp. 503-531. The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.