A place like home care and action in public administration

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 26-41

  Stivers, Camilla ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Administration; Care; Hannah Arendt; Home

Indexed keywords

EID: 13844299296     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074004271665     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Addams, J. (2002). Democracy and social ethics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. (Original work published 1902)
2. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Arendt, H. (1968). Men in dark times. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
4. Aristotle. (1981). The politics (T. A. Sinclair, Trans.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
5. Baker, P. (1990). The domestication of politics: Women and American political society, 1780-1920. In L. Gordon (Ed.), Women, the state, and welfare (pp. 55-91). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
6. Baker, S., & Van Doorne-Huiskes, A. (Eds.). (1999). Women and public policy: The shifting boundary between public and private. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
7. Beresford, A. (2004). Homeland security as an American ideology: Implications for U.S. policy and action. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 1(3), Article 301. Retrieved August 30, 2004, from http://www.bepress.com/jhsem/voll/iss3/301
8. Bordo, S. (1987). The Cartesian masculinization of thought. In S. Harding & J. F. O'Barr (Eds.), Sex and scientific inquiry (pp. 247-264). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Bowlker, T. J. (1912, June). Women's home-making function applied to the municipality. American City, 6, 863-869.
10. Chambers, C. (1963). Seedtime of reform: American social service and social action, 1918-1933. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11. Clark, L. M. G., & Lange, L. (Eds.). (1979). The sexism of social and political theory: Women and reproduction from Plato to Nietzsche. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
12. Cleveland, F. W. (1909). Chapters on municipal administration and accounting. New York: Longman.
13. Deardorff, N. R. (1914, November). Women in municipal activities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 56, 71-77.
14. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. De Lauretis, T. (1990, Spring). Eccentric subjects: Feminist theory and historical consciousness. Feminist Studies, 16, 115-150.
16. Deutsch, S. (1992, April). Learning to talk more like a man: Boston women's class-bridging organizations. American Historical Review, 97, 379-404.
17. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.
18. Finegold, K. (1995). Experts and politicians: Reform challenges to machine politics in New York, Cleveland, and Chicago. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Flanagan, M. (1990, October). Gender and urban political reform: The City Club and the Woman's City Club of Chicago in the progressive era. American Historical Review, 95, 1032-1050.
20. Fox, K. (1977). Better city government: Innovation in American urban politics, 1850-1937. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21. Gould, C. (1983). Private rights and public virtues: Women, the family, and democracy. In C. Gould (Ed.), Beyond domination: New perspectives on women and philosophy (pp. 3-20). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Berger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)
23. Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). New York: Harper Colophon Books.
24. Heidegger, M. (1981). Erlaeuterungen zu Hoelderlins Dichtung [Amplifications of Hoelderlin's Poetry]. Frankfurt, Germany: Vittorio Klostermann.
25. Hendley, S. (1998). Reconsidering the limits of democracy with Castoriadis and Lefort. In L. Langsdorf, S. Watson, & K. Smith (Eds.), Reinterpreting the political: Continental philosophy and political theory (pp. 171-182). Albany: State University of New York Press.
26. Hollander, J. (1993). It all depends. In A. Mack (Ed.), Home: A place in the world (pp. 27-46). New York: New York University Press.
27. Holmes, J. H. (1910, December 24). Of new ideals and the city. The Survey, 25, 499-501.
28. Honig, B. (1994, Fall). Difference, dilemmas, and the politics of home. Social Research, 61, 563-597.
29. Hummel, R. (2004). A once and future politics: Heidegger's recovery of the political in Parmenides. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26, 279-303.
30. Johnson, L. (1996, October). As housewives we are worms: Women, modernity and the home question. Cultural Studies, 10, 449-463.
31. Kaplan, A. (2002). Homeland insecurities: Reflections on language and space. Radical History Review, 85, 82-93.
32. King, C. S., Stivers, C., & collaborators. (1998). Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Lasch-Quinn, E. (1993). Black neighbors: Race and the limits of reform in the American settlement movement, 1890-1945. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
34. McSwite, O. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. McSwite, O. C. (2004). Creating reality through administrative practice: A psychoanalytic reading of Camilla Stivers' Bureau Men, Settlement Women. Administration & Society, 36, 406-426.
36. Mink, G. (1990). The lady and the tramp. In L. Gordon (Ed.), Women, the state, and welfare (pp. 92-122). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
37. Noddings, N. (2002). Caring and social policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38. Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39. Peccorella, R. F. (1994). Community power in a post-reform city: Politics in New York City. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
40. Pratt, M. B. (1984). Identity: Skin blood heart. In E. Bulkin, M. B. Pratt, & B. Smith (Eds.), Yours in struggle: Three feminist perspectives on anti-Semitism and racism (pp. 9-64). Ithaca, NY: Firebrand Books.
41. Stivers, C. (1990). The public agency as polis: Active citizenship in the administrative state. Administration & Society, 22, 86-105.
42. Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
43. Stivers, C. (in press). A civic machinery for democratic expression: Jane Addams on public administration. In M. French & C. Nackenoff (Eds.), Women's experience shaping theory: Jane Addams's life and theory. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
44. Taft, J. (1915, April). The woman movement and the larger social situation. International Journal of Ethics, 25, 328-345.
45. Thiele, L. P. (1995). Timely meditations: Martin Heidegger and postmodern politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Ventriss, C. (2002). A democratic public and administrative thought: A public perspective. In J. Jun (Ed.), Rethinking administrative theory: The challenge of the new century (pp. 93-204). London: Praeger.
47. Villa, D. (1996). Arendt and Heidegger: The fate of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48. Weinstein, J. (1968). The corporate Ideal in the liberal state, 1900-1918. Boston: Beacon.
49. Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
50. Young, I. M. (2000). House and home: Feminist variations on a theme. In D. Olkowski (Ed.), Resistance, flight, creation: Feminist enactments of French philosophy (pp. 49-78). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.