Sensitive information: A review and research agenda

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 245-257

  Thompson, E Dale ^a   Kaarst Brown, Michelle L ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SENSITIVITY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SECURITY INFORMATICS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; DATA ACQUISITION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 13844297772     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20121     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Aboody, D., & Lev, B. (2000). Information asymmetry, R & D and insider gains. Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2747-2767.
2. Anzaldua, G. (1987). Borderlands = La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
3. Baba, M.L. (1999). Dangerous liaisons: Trust, distrust, and information technology in American work organizations. Human Organization, 58(3), 331-346.
4. Beghtol, C. (1986). Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: Aboutncss analysis, intertextuality, and the cognitive act of classifying documents. Journal of Documentation, 42(2), 84-113.
5. Beghtol, C. (1995). 'Facets' as interdisciplinary undiscovered public knowledge: S.R. Ranganathan in India and L. Guttman in Israel. Journal of Documentation, 51(3), 194-224.
6. Bellman, B.L. (1984). The language of secrecy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
7. Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Bloomfield, R., & O'Hara, M. (1999). Market transparency: Who wins and who loses? Review of Financial Studies, 12(1), 5-35.
9. Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. (1999). Sorting things out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Boyce, B. (1982). Beyond topicality: A two-stage view of relevance and the retrieval process. Information Processing and Management, 18, 105-109.
11. Brandt, E. (1980). On secrecy and the control of knowledge: Taos Pueblo. In S. Tefft (Ed.), Secrecy (pp. 351). New York: Human Sciences Press.
12. British Standards Institute. (2000). Information technology-Code of practice for information security management (standard 0-580-36958-7). London: British Standards Institute.
13. Brown, M.L. (1995). A theory of information technology cultures: Magic dragons, wizards and archetypal patterns. Toronto, Canada: York University.
14. Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review, 65, 14-21.
15. Bushman, R.M. (1991). Public disclosure and the structure of private information. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 261-276.
16. Chen, C.R., & Mohan, N.J. (1994). Timing the disclosure of information: Management's view of earnings announcements. Financial Management, 23(3), 63-69.
17. Chen, Y. (1994). Conflicting interests in information disclosure and shortterm orientation of firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12(2), 211-225.
18. Congressional Research Service. (2003, July 2). "Sensitive but unclassified" and other federal security controls on scientific and technical information: History and current controversy.
19. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved December 2, 2003, from http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/rl31845.pdf
20. Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Dilworth, D.C. (1987). "Sensitive but unclassified" information: The controversy. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 13(4), 12-16.
22. Doyle, K. (1999). The end of secrecy: U.S. national security and the imperative for openness. World Policy Journal, 16(1), 34-51.
23. Drake, P., & Clarke, S. C. (2001, May). Information security: A technical or human Domain? Paper presented at the Information Resources Management Association, Toronto, Canada.
24. Earley, P. (1988). Family of spies: Inside the John Walker spy ring. New York: Bantam Doubleday.
25. Eloff, J.H.P., Holbein, R., & Teufel, S. (1996). Security classification for documents. Computers and Security, 15(1), 55-71.
26. Fairthorne, R.A. (1969). Content analysis, specification and control. ARIST, 4, 73-109.
27. Farrell, G. (2002, April 10). Former Anderson executive to testify. USA Today, p. B1.
28. Fine, G.A., & Holyfield, L. (1996). Secrecy, trust, and dangerous leisure: Generating group cohesion in voluntary organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 22-38.
29. Forsythe, D.E. (1992, November). Using ethnography to build a working system: Rethinking basic design assumptions. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Baltimore, MD.
30. Gennotte, G., & Trueman, B. (1996). The strategic timing of corporate disclosures. Review of Financial Studies, 9(2), 665-690.
31. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
32. Gostin, L.O. (1995). Genetic privacy. The Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics, 23(4), 320-330.
33. Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative polities for inappropriated others. In C.N.P. Treichler & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Cultural studies now and in the future (pp. 295-335). New York: Routledge.
34. Hare, C. (2001). Improving network-level security through real-time monitoring and intrusion detection. In H.F.A.M.K. Tipton (Ed.), Information security management handbook (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 569-595). Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications.
35. Healy, J.R., & Nathan, S. (2000, August 2). Officials have known SUV tire suspicions for decades. USA Today, p. B1.
36. Hulme, G.V. (2001). Management takes notice. Information Week. Retrieved September 30, 2001, from http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20010831S0014
37. Iwata, E. (2002, February 19). Enron case could be largest corporate forensics investigation. USA Today, p. B1.
38. Jacob, E.K. (1991, October). Classification and categorization: Drawing the line. Paper presented at the 2nd ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Washington, DC.
39. Joint Security Commission. (1994). Redefining security. Washington, DC: Joint Security Commission.
40. Jones, A.K. (2002, May). Network security. Paper presented at the Critical Infrastructure and Information Assurance Symposium, Syracuse, NY.
41. Kaarst-Brown, M.L., and Robey, D. (1999). More on myth, magic, and metaphor: Cultural insights into the management of information technology in organizations. Information, Technology and People, 12(2).
42. Katriel, T. (1991). Sodot: Secret-sharing as a social form among Israeli children. Research on Languages and Social Interaction, 24, 141-157.
43. Kim, O., & Verrecchia, R.E. (1997). Pre-announcement and event period private information. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(3), 395-419.
44. Konar, S., & Cohen, M.A. (1997). Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1), 109-124.
45. Kwasnik, B.H. (1991). The importance of factors that are not document attributes in the organization of personal documents. Journal of Documentation, 47(4), 389-398.
46. Kwasnik, B.H. (1999). The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery. Library Trends, 48(1), 22-47.
47. Laguerre, M.S. (1980). Bizango: A voodoo secret society in Haiti. In S. Tefft (Ed.), Secrecy (pp. 351). New York: Human Sciences Press.
48. Landau, R. (1998). Secrecy, anonymity, and deception in donor insemination: A genetic, psycho-social and ethical critique. Social Work in Health Care, 28(1), 75-89.
49. Lewis, T.R., & Poitevin, M. (1997). Disclosure of information in regulatory proceedings. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations, 13(1), 50-73.
50. Liddy, E.D. (2001). Information security and sharing. Online, 28-30.
51. Locke, J. (1996). Essay concerning human understanding: Abridged and edited, with an introduction and notes. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co. (Original work published 1689)
52. Maingot, A.P. (1995). Offshore secrecy centers and the necessary role of states: Bucking the trend. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 37(4), 1-24.
53. March, J. G., Schulz, M., & Zhou, X. (2000). The dynamics of rules. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
54. Markman, E.M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
55. McCloskey, M.E., & Glucksburg, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory and Cognition, 6, 462-472.
56. Metten, D. (1999). Enculturation into secrecy among junior high school girls. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(2), 107-137.
57. Mervis, C.B., & Rosch, E. (1981), Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89-115.
58. Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 23-39.
59. Murray, W.H. (2000). Enterprise security architecture. In H.F.A.M.K. Tipton (Ed.), Information security management handbook (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 215-230). Boca Raton, PL: Auerbach Publications.
60. O'Donnell, J. (2002, June 10), House panel investigates leaks at FDA. USA Today, p. B1.
61. Orlikowski, W.J. (1991). Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting Management and Information Technology, 1(1), 9-42.
62. Pae, S. (1999). Acquisition and discretionary disclosure of private information and its implications for firms' productive activities. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 465-474.
63. Palmer, C.T. (1990). Telling the truth (up to a point): Radio communication among Maine lobstermen. Human Organization, 49(2), 157-163.
64. Parker, D.B. (1996). Classification of information to protect it from loss. Information Systems Security, 5(2), 9-15.
65. Peltier, T.R. (1998). Information classification. Information Systems Security, 7(3), 31-43.
66. Philips, L. (1989). The economics of imperfect information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. PoliVec. (2002). Security policy development process. Colorado Springs, CO: PoliVec Inc.
68. Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B.B. (Eds.). (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Rosenberg, K.F., & Groze, V. (1997). The impact of secrecy and denial in adoption: Practice and treatment issues. Families in Society, 78(5), 522-530.
70. Ryan, J.J.C.H. (2001). Information security practices and experiences in small businesses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
71. Schaefer, R.T. (1980). The management of secrecy: The Ku Klux Klan's successful secret. In S. Tefft (Ed.), Secrecy (pp. 161-177). New York: Human Sciences.
72. Scholz, C. (1990). The symbolic value of computerized information systems. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape (pp. 233-254). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
73. Sheler, J.L., & Glasser, J. (2002, December 23). A fall from grace. US News and World Report, 133(24), 19.
74. Shils, E.A. (1956). The torment of secrecy, the background and consequences of American security policies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
75. Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel (K.H. Wolff, Trans.). New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1912)
76. Star, S.L. (1998). Grounded classification: Grounded theory and faceted classification. Library Trends, 47(2), 218-232.
77. Study: Most support government web action. (2002). Associated Press. Retrieved September 5, 2002, from http://www.ap.org
78. Taylor, A.G. ( 1999). The organization of information. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
79. Teoh, S.H. (1997). Information disclosure and voluntary contributions to public goods. RAND Journal of Economics, 28(3), 385-406.
80. Thompson, D.F. (1999). Democratic secrecy. Political Science Quarterly, 114(2), 181-193.
81. U.S. Congress. (2003, December). Joint inquiry into intelligence community activities before and after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Retrieved December 4, 2003, from http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/ creports/911.html
82. U.S. Department of Defense. (1985). Keeping the nation's secrets: A report to the secretary of defense. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
83. U.S. Government Accounting Office. (2000, March 29). Federal information security: Actions needed to address widespread weaknesses. Retrieved June 10, 2003, from http://www.gao.gov
84. Valdmanis, T. (2002, September 19). Merrill-Lynch fires two bankers. USA Today, p. B1.
85. Van Dijk, T.A. (1979). Relevance assignment in discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 2, 113-126.
86. Warren, C., & Laslett, B. (1977). Privacy and secrecy: A conceptual comparison. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 43-51.
87. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.
88. Yovetich, N.A., & Drigotas, S.M. (1999). Secret transmission: A relative intimacy hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9), 1135-1146.
89. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338-353.