Optimization of tropical juice composition for the Spanish market

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2005, Pages

  Serrano Megías, Marta ^a   Pérez López, Antonio Jose ^a   Núñez Delicado, Estrella ^a   Beltrán, Felipe ^b   López Nicolás, José Manuel ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b J Garcia Carrion S A   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Internal preference map; Principal component analysis; Proxscal analysis; Tropical juice

Indexed keywords

ANANAS COMOSUS; PASSIFLORA EDULIS; VITIS SP.;

EID: 13844296964     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb09060.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bouroche JM. 1977. Analyze des données en marketing. París: Masson.
2. Bower JA, Baxter IA. 2000. Consumer perception of the nature and quality of "homemade" and commercial dairy ice cream. Brit Food J 102:821-37.
3. Caroll JD. 1972. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In: Shepard RN, Romney AK, Nerlove SB, editors. Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. Vol.1. New York: Seminar Press. p 105-55.
4. Christensen CR. 1983. Effects of color on aroma, flavor and texture judgments on foods. J Food Sci 48:787-90.
5. Gazano G. 1984. Mise en place et m thodologie de la technique de profil sensoriel. M moire bibliographique, DEA, Sciences alimentaires, ENSiA.
6. Greenhoff K, MacFie HJH. 1994. Preference mapping in practice. In: MacFie HJH, Thompson DMH, editors. Measurement of food preferences. London: Blackie Academic & Professional. p 137-66.
7. ISO. 1993. Sensory analysis. General guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors. Part q: Selected assessors. Geneve, ISO.
8. ISO 4120. 1983. Sensory analysis-Methodology-Triangle test. 1 ed. Geneva: ISO.
9. ISO9001. 2000. Comercialización y distribución de instrumentación científiq y equipos para laboratorios. Geneve, ISO.
10. Issanchou S. 1990. M thodes non verbales. In: Depledt F, Strigler F, editors. Evaluation sensorielle. Manuel m thodologique. Paris: Collection Sciences & techniques agroalimentaires. p 169-81.
11. Juhl HJ. 1994. A sensory analysis on butter cookies. An application of generalized procrustes analysis. MAPP working paper nr 20. ISSN 0907 2101.
12. Kinsey J, Senauer B. 1996. Changes in retail food delivery: signals for producers, processors, and distributors. In: working paper 96-03. The retail food industry center. Univ. of Minnesota. p 38.
13. Lawless HT. 1989. Exploration of fragrance categories and ambiguous odors using multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Chem Sens 14:349-60.
14. MacFie HJ, Bratchell N, Greenhoff K, Vallis LV. 1989. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in Hall Tests. J Sens Stud 4:129-48.
15. MAPA. (Ministerio de agricultura pesca y alimentación) 2003. La Alimentación Espa-ola en 2001. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación. Available from MAPA: www.mapa.es/es/alimentacion/ alimentacion.htm. Accessed Dec 22, 2004.
16. MAPA. 2000. Consumo alimentano. Madrid, Ministerio de agricultura pesca y alimentación. Available from MAPA: www.mapa.es
17. Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT. 1999. Sensory evaluation techniques. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, Fla.:CRC Press, Inc. p 385.
18. Piggot JR, Sharman K. 1986. Methods to aid interpretation of multidimensional data. In: Piggott JR, editor. Statistical procedures in food research. London: Elsevier Applied Science. p 181-232
19. Price C. 1990. Marketing juice from Arkansas' seedless table grapes. ArstHortSoc 111:91-7.
20. Sauvageot F. 1975. L'analyse sensorielle: outil scientifique? Cah Nut Diet 10: 26-44.
21. Sijtsema S, Linnemann A, Gaasbeed TV, Dagevos H, Jongen W. 2002. Variables influencing food perception reviewed for consumer-oriented product development. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 42:565-81.