Re: "Studies with low response proportions may be less biased than studies with high response proportions" (multiple letters)

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 161, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 401-403

  Voigt, Lynda F ^a,b   Boudreau, Denise M ^c,d   Weiss, Noel S ^a,b   Malone, Kathleen E ^a,b   Li, Christopher I ^a,b   Daling, Janet R ^a,b   Stang, Andreas ^e   Jöckel, Karl Heinz ^f  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITÄT HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR;

EPIDEMIOLOGY;

BREAST CANCER; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DRUG USE; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERVIEW; LETTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRESCRIPTION; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 13844289476     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi056     Document Type: Letter

References (0)