On the Nature of a Critical Methodology

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-50

  Yanchar, Stephen C ^a   Gantt, Edwin E ^a   Clay, Samuel L ^b  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

argument construction; counterrules; Feyerabend; historical perspective; methodological pluralism; qualitative methods; quantitative methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 13844281555     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354305049743     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Ahsen, A.(1959).Hemispheric experiments on eidetic images of parents.Paper presented at the meeting of the Pakistan Science Conference.
2. Ahsen, A.(1965). Eidetic psychotherapy: A short introduction.New York: Brandon House.
3. Ahsen, A.(1977).Eidetics: An overview. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1(1),5–38.
4. Ahsen, A.(1984 a).ISM: The triple code model for imagery and psychophysiology. Journal of Mental Imagery, 8(4),15–42.
5. Ahsen, A.(1984 b). Trojan horse: Imagery in psychology, art, literature, and politics.New York: Brandon House.
6. Ahsen, A.(1986).Prologue to unvividness paradox. Journal of Mental Imagery, 10(1),1–8.
7. Ahsen, A.(1990).AA-VVIQ and imagery paradigm: Vividness and unvividness issue in VVIQ research programs. Journal of Mental Imagery, 14(3–4),1–58.
8. Ahsen, A.(2003 a).Imagery and maze: Learning through imagery functions. Journal of Mental Imagery, 27(3–4),1–60.
9. Ahsen, A.(2003 b).Quantum image. Journal of Mental Imagery, 27(3–4),93–109.
10. Ashworth, P.D.,Giorgi, A., &de Koning, A.J.J.(Eds.). (1986). Qualitative research in psychology.Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
11. Ayer, A.J.(1978). Introduction. In W. James(Ed.), Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking (pp. 7–30).Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Bakan, D.(1961).Idolatry in religion and science. Christian Scholar, 44,223–230.
13. Bakan, D.(1972, March). Psychology can now kick the science habit. Psychology Today, pp. 26–26, 28–28, 86–88.
14. Bechtel, W.(1988). Philosophy of science: An overview for cognitive science.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Berg, B.L.(1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.).Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Bernard, H.R.(2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Bernstein, R.J.(1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
18. Bevan, W.(1991).Contemporary psychology: A tour inside the onion. American Psychologist, 46,475–483.
19. Bohm, D.(1980). Wholeness and the implicate order.New York: Ark.
20. Bohman, J.(1991). New philosophy of social science: Problems of indeterminancy.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Carnap, R.(1947). Meaning and necessity.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. Churchill, S.(2000).‘Seeing through’ self-deception in narrative reports: Finding psychological truth in problematic data. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 31,44–62.
23. Cresswell, J.W.(2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Cronbach, L.J.(1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Wainer, &H.I. Braun(Eds.), Test validity (pp. 3–17).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Daniels, A.K.(1983).Self-deception and self-discovery in fieldwork. Qualitative Sociology, 6(3),195–214.
26. Danziger, K.(1988). On theory and method in psychology. In W.J. Baker, L.P. Mos, H. van Rappard, &H.J. Stam(Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (pp. 87–94).New York: Springer-Verlag.
27. Danziger, K.(1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research.New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Davidson, D.(1984). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In D. Davidson(Ed.), Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 183–198).New York: Oxford University Press.
29. de Boer, T.(1982). Foundations of a critical psychology.Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
30. Denzin, N.K., &Lincoln, Y.S.(Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Descartes, R.(1993). Discourse on method and the meditations (D.A. Cress, Trans.).Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published 1637.)
32. Dreyfus, H.L.(1992). Heidegger's hermeneutic realism. In D.R. Hiley, J.F. Bohman, & R. Shusterman(Eds.), The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture (pp. 25–41).Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33. Feyerabend, P.(1962). Explanation, reduction, and empiricism. In H. Feigl& G. Maxwell(Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. III. Scientific explanation, space, and time (pp. 28–97).Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
34. Feyerabend, P.(1977).Changing patterns of reconstruction. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 28,351–382.
35. Feyerabend, P.(1993). Against method (3rd ed.).London: Verso.
36. Fischer, W.F.(1985). Self-deception: An empirical-phenomenological inquiry into its essential meanings. In A. Giorgi(Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 118–154).Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
37. Fox, D.R., &Prilleltensky, I.(Eds.). (1997). Critical psychology: An introduction.London: Sage.
38. Fuller, A.R.(1990). Insight into value: An exploration of the premises of a phenomenological psychology.Albany: State University of New York Press.
39. Gadamer, H.G.(1989). Truth and method (2nd ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall, Trans.).New York: Continuum.
40. Gantt, E.E., &Williams, R.N.(2002). Pursuing psychology as science of the ethical: Contributions of the work of Emmanuel Levinas. In E.E. Gantt&R.N. Williams(Eds.), Psychology for the other: Levinas, ethics, and the practice of psychology (pp. 1–31).Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
41. Gergen, K.J.(1985).The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40,266–275.
42. Gibbs, R.W., &Berg, E.A.(2002).Mental imagery and embodied activity. Journal of Mental Imagery, 26(1–2),1–30.
43. Gibson, J.J.(1979). An ecological approach to visual perception.New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
44. Giorgi, A.(1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach.New York: Harper & Row.
45. Green, C.D.(1992 a).Of immortal mythological beasts: Operationism in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 2,291–320.
46. Green, C.D.(1992 b).Is unified positivism the answer to psychology's disunity? American Psychologist, 47,1057–1058.
47. Guignon, C.(1991). Pragmatism or hermeneutics? Epistemology after foundationalism. In D.R. Hiley, J.F. Bohman, & R. Shusterman(Eds.), The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture (pp. 81–101).Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48. Habermas, J.(1987). Knowledge and human interests (J.J. Shapiro, Trans.).Cambridge: Polity.
49. Hammersley, M.(1992). What's wrong with ethnography? Methodological explorations.London: Routledge.
50. Harré, R., &Secord, P.F.(1972). The explanation of social behavior.Oxford: Blackwell.
51. Hempel, C.(1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science.New York: Free Press.
52. Hesse, M.(1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
53. Hochman, J.(2002). Memory and the eidetic: In phenomenological context and functional operations.New York: Brandon House.
54. Hofmann, S.G.(1999).Introducing the grandmother test into psychological science. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 19,167–176.
55. Holton, G.(1973). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Horkheimer, M.(1972). Critical theory: Selected essays (M.J. O'Connell, Trans.).New York: Herder & Herder.
57. Hoshmand, L.T.(1989).Alternate research paradigms: A review and teaching proposal. The Counseling Psychologist, 17,3–79.
58. Hoshmand, L.T., &Polkinghorne, D.E.(1992).Redefining the science–practice relationship and professional training. American Psychologist, 47,55–66.
59. James, W.(1950). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1).New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890.)
60. James, W.(1978). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1907.)
61. Koch, S.(1959). Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3).New York: McGraw-Hill.
62. Koch, S.(1999). Psychology in human context: Essays in dissidence and reconstruction.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63. Kopala, M., &Suzuki, L.A.(1999). Using qualitative methods in psychology.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Kuhn, T.S.(1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.).Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65. Kvale, S.(1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Lakatos, I.(1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos& A. Musgrave(Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196).New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Leahey, T.H.(1980).The myth of operationism. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1,127–143.
68. Manicas, P.T., &Secord, P.F.(1983).Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 38,399–413.
69. Marks, D.F.(1973).Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64,17–24.
70. Martin, J.(1996).Psychological research as the formulation, demonstration, and critique of psychological theories. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 16,1–18.
71. Martin, J., &Sugarman, J.(1999).Psychology's reality debate: A ‘levels’ of reality approach. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 19,177–194.
72. Martin, J., &Sugarman, J.(2000).Between the modern and the postmodern: The possibility of self and progressive understanding in psychology. American Psychologist, 55,397–406.
73. Maslow, A.H.(1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.).Princeton, NJ: D. van Nostrand.
74. Messick, S.(1995).Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50,741–749.
75. Michell, J.(2003).The quantitative imperative: Positivism, na®ive realism, and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13,5–31.
76. Mishler, E.G.(1979).Meaning in context: Is there any other kind? Harvard Educational Review, 49,1–19.
77. Morgan, G.(Ed.). (1983). Beyond method: Strategies for social research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
78. Nelson, J.S.,Megill, A., &McCloskey, D.N.(Eds.). (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
79. Newton-Smith, W.H.(1981). The rationality of science.Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
80. Penfield, W.(1952).Memory mechanisms. AMA Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 67,178–191.
81. Polanyi, M.(1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82. Polkinghorne, D.E.(1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry.Albany: State University of New York Press.
83. Polkinghorne, D.E.(1990). Psychology after philosophy. In J.E. Faulconer&R.N. Williams(Eds.), Reconsidering psychology: Perspectives from continental philosophy (pp. 92–115).Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
84. Pollio, H.R.,Henley, T., &Thompson, C.B.(1997). The phenomenology of everyday life.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Popper, K.(1959). The logic of scientific discovery.New York: Harper & Row.
86. Punch, K.F.(1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches.London: Sage.
87. Putnam, H.(1995). Pragmatism: An open question.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
88. Quine, W.V.O.(1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. In W.V.O. Quine(Ed.), From a logical point of view (pp. 20–46).Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89. Richardson, F.C.(1998).Beyond scientism and postmodernism? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 18,33–45.
90. Robinson, D.N.(2000).Paradigms and ‘the myth of framework’: How science progresses. Theory & Psychology, 10,39–47.
91. Rozin, P.(2001).Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1),2–14.
92. Rychlak, J.F.(1993).A suggested principle of complementarity for psychology: In theory, not method. American Psychologist, 48,933–942.
93. Schlick, M.(1979). Mortiz Schlick: Philosophical papers.Dordrecht: Reidel.
94. Schneider, K.J.(1998).Toward a science of the heart: Romanticism and the revival of psychology. American Psychologist, 53,277–289.
95. Schrag, C.O.(1980). Radical reflection and the origins of the human sciences.West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
96. Slife, B.D.(2000).Are discourse communities incommensurable in a fragmented psychology? The possibility of disciplinary coherence. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21,261–271.
97. Slife, B.D., &Gantt, E.E.(1999).Methodological pluralism: A framework for psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55,1453–1465.
98. Slife, B.D., &Williams, R.N.(1995). What's behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
99. Slife, B.D., &Williams, R.N.(1997).Toward a theoretical psychology: Should a subdiscipline be formally recognized? American Psychologist, 52,117–129.
100. Sloan, T.(Ed.). (2000). Critical psychology: Voices for change.Basingstoke: Macmillan.
101. Smith, J.A.,Harré, R., &van Langenhove, L.(Eds.). (1995). Rethinking methods in psychology.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
102. Smith, M.B.(1994).Selfhood at risk: Postmodern perils and the perils of postmodernism. American Psychologist, 49,405–411.
103. Spackman, M.P., &Williams, R.N.(2001).The affiliation of methodology with ontology in a scientific psychology. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 22,389–406.
104. Sumner, F.C., &Watts, F.P.(1936).Rivalry between uniocular negative afterimages and the vision of the other eye. American Journal of Psychology, 48,109–116.
105. Taylor, C.(1985). Peaceful coexistence in psychology. In C. Taylor(Ed.), Human agency and language: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 117–138).New York: Cambridge University Press.
106. Tolman, C.W.(Ed.). (1992). Positivism in psychology: Historical and contemporary problems.New York: Springer-Verlag.
107. Tolman, C.W., &Maiers, W.(Eds.). (1991). Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108. Toulmin, S.E.(2003). The uses of argument (updated ed.).New York: Cambridge University Press.
109. van Kaam, A.(1966). Existential foundations of psychology.Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
110. Wallach, M.A., &Wallach, L.(1998).When experiments serve little purpose: Misguided research in mainstream psychology. Theory & Psychology, 8,183–194.
111. Warner, C.T.(1986). Anger and similar delusions. In R. Harré(Ed.), The social construction of emotion (pp. 135–166).Oxford: Blackwell.
112. Wartofsky, M.W.(1980). Scientific judgment: Creativity and discovery in scientific thought. In T. Nickles(Ed.), Scientific discovery: Case studies (pp. 1–20).Boston, MA: Reidel.
113. Wertz, F.J.(1999).Multiple methods in psychology: Epistemological grounding and the possibility of unity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 19,131–166.
114. Williams, R.N.(2000, July).Methodological implications of the phenomenon of mispresence.Paper presentation at the XXVII International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
115. Yanchar, S.C.(1997).William James and the challenge of methodological pluralism. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 18,425–442.
116. Yanchar, S.C., &Hill, J.R.(2003).What is psychology about? Toward an explicit ontology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43,11–32.
117. Yuille, J.C.(1986). The futility of a purely experimental psychology of cognition: Imagery as a case study. In D. Marks(Ed.), Theories of image formation (pp. 197–224).New York: Brandon House.