Morphological characterization of the interaction between Diplocarpon rosae and various rose species

Plant Pathology

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 82-90

  Blechert, O ^a   Debener, T ^b  

^a Inst for Ornamental Plant Breeding   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Black spot; Hypersensitive response; Infection; Resistance; Rose breeding

Indexed keywords

DISEASE RESISTANCE; FUNGAL DISEASE; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; MORPHOLOGY; ORNAMENTAL SPECIES; PLANT BREEDING;

DIPLOCARPON ROSAE; FUNGI; ROSA;

EID: 13844271195     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01118.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aronescu A, 1934. Diplocarpon rosae: from spore germination to haustorium formation. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 61, 291-329.
2. Debener T, 2000. Strategies for the introduction of disease resistance genes from wild rose species into cultivated varieties. Historic Rose Journal 19, 29-33.
3. Debener T, Drewes-Alvarez R, Rockstroh K, 1998. Identification of five physiological races of blackspot, Diplocarpon rosae Wolf, on roses. Plant Breeding 117, 267-70.
4. Debener T, v. Malek B, Schreiber M, Drewes-Alvarez R, 2003. Marker assisted background selection for the introgression of black spot resistance into cultivated roses. European Journal of Horticultural Science 68, 245-52.
5. Drewes-Alvarez R, 2003. Black spot. In: Roberts A, Debener T, Gudin S, eds. Encyclopedia of Rose Sciences. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, 148-53.
6. Frick L, 1943. Untersuchungen über Biologie und Pathogenität von Diplocarpon rosae (Lib.) Wolf. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 14, 525-91.
7. Fries E, 1815. Observationes Mycologicae, 1. Copenhagen, Denmark: G. Bonnier.
8. Heath MC, 1996. Plant resistance to fungi. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 18, 469-75.
9. Hood ME, Shew HD, 1996. Applications of KOH-aniline blue fluorescence in the study of plant-fungal interactions. Phytopathology 86, 704-8.
10. Horst RK, 1983. Compendium of Rose Diseases. St Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society.
11. Jenkins WR, 1955. Variability of pathogenicity and physiology of Diplocarpon rosae Wolf, the rose blackspot fungus. American Rose Annual 40, 92-7.
12. Krüssmann G, 1974. Rosen, Rosen, Rosen. Berlin, Germany: Paul Parey Verlag.
13. Libert MA, 1826. Observation sur le genre Asteroma et description de deux èspeces appartenant à ce genre. Mémoires de la Société Linnéenne de Paris 5, 404-6.
14. von Malek B, Debener T, 1998. Genetic analysis of resistance to blackspot (Diplocarpon rosae) in tetraploid roses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96, 228-31.
15. Nauta MM, Spooner BM, 2000. British Dermateaceae: 4B. Dermateoideae gerna B-E. Mycologist 14, 21-8.
16. Palmer JG, Semeniuk P, Stewart RN, 1966. Roses and blackspot. I. Pathogenicity to excised leaflets of Diplocarpon rosae from seven geographic locations. Phytopathology 56, 1277-82.
17. Preece TF, 1962. Removal of apple leaf cuticle by pectinase to reveal the mycelium of Venturia inaequalis (Cooke) Wat. Nature (London) 193, 902-3.
18. Vleeshouwers VGAA, van Dooijeweert W, Govers F, Kamoun S, Colon LT, 2000. The hypersensitive response is associated with host and nonhost resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Planta 210, 853-64.
19. Widholm JM, 1972. The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured plant cells. Stain Technology 47, 189-94.
20. Wiegand J, 2001. Untersuchungen Zum Erreger Des Sternrußtaus Diplocarpon Rosae (Lib.) Wolf and Rosen. Dresden, Germany: Dresden Germany Polytechnic for Technology and Economics, BSc thesis.
21. Wissemann V, 2003. Conventional taxonomy (wild roses). In: Roberts A, Debener T, Gudin S, eds. Encyclopedia of Rose Sciences. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, 111-7.
22. Yokoya K, Kandasamy KI, Walker S, Mandegaran Z, Roberts AV, 2000. Resistance of roses to pathotypes of Diplocarpon rosae. Annals of Applied Biology 136, 15-20.