Intergovernmental relations and native American gaming a case study on the emergence of a new intergovernmental relations participant

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 74-93

  Mays, G Larry ^a   Taggart, William A ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Indian gaming; Intergovernmental relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 13844266784     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074004273153     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Anders, G. C. (1998). Indian gaming: Financial and regulatory issues. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 556, 98-108.
2. Anderson, W. (1960). Intergovernmental relations in review, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Barker, T., & Britz, M. (2000). Joker's wild: Legalized gambling in the twenty-first century. Westport, CT: Praeger.
4. Bartlett, D. L., & Steele, J. B. (2002, December 16 & 23). Special report: Indian casinos. Time pp. 44, 52.
5. Berkey, C. G. (1992). United States-Indian relations: The constitutional basis. In O. Lyons & J. Mohawk (Eds.), Exiled in the land of the free: Democracy, Indian nations, and the U.S. Constitution (pp. 190-225). Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light.
6. Boehmke, F. J., & Witmer, R. (2001, November). State and American Indian negotiation of gaming compacts: An event count analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Iowa Conference of Political Scientists, Ames, IA.
7. Brosnan, D. (1996). Indian policy, Indian gaming, and the future of tribal economic development. American Review of Public Administration, 26(2), 213-229.
8. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987).
9. Casino deal heads to Senate. (2001, March 7). Albuquerque Journal, p. A1.
10. Contreras, G. (2002). Exclusivity agreements in tribal-state compacts: Mutual benefit revenue sharing of illegal state taxation. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 15, 487-511. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com
11. Council of State Governments. (1977). Interstate compacts 1783-1977: A revised compilation. Lexington, KY: Author.
12. Deloria, V., Jr., & Lytle, C. M. (1983). American Indians, American justice. Austin: University of Texas Press.
13. Eadington, W. (Ed.). (1998). Indian gaming & the law. Reno: University of Nevada, Reno, Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming.
14. Elazar, D. J. (1984). American federalism: A view from the states. New York: Harper and Row.
15. Emenhiser, J. (2002). A peculiar relationship: American Indian peoples and the U.S. Constitution. In J. M. Meyer (Ed.), American Indians and U.S. politics: A companion reader (pp. 3-11). Westport, CT: Praeger.
16. Getches, D., Wilkinson, C., & Williams, R., Jr. (1998). Federal Indian law (4th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
17. Giacopassi, D., Nichols, M., & Stitt, B. G. (1999a). Attitudes of community leaders in new casino jurisdictions regarding casino gambling's effects on crime and quality of life. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(2), 123-147.
18. Giacopassi, D., Nichols, M., & Stitt, B. G. (1999b). How do casinos affect communities? Business Perspectives, 11(4), 23-27.
19. Giacopassi, D., & Stitt, B. G. (1993). Assessing the impact of casino gambling on crime in Mississippi. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 18(1), 117-131.
20. Gibb, D. (1999). Note: Intergovernmental compacts in Native American law: Models for expanded usage. Harvard Law Review, 112, 922. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com
21. Goodman, R. (1995). The luck business: The devastating consequences and broken promises of America's gambling explosion. New York: Martin Kessler.
22. Hanson, R. L. (2004). Intergovernmental relations. In V. Gray & R. Hanson (Eds.), Politics in the American states (8th ed., pp. 31-61). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
23. Harris, L., Sachs, S. M., & Morris, B. (2002, April). Honoring the circle: Developing government-to-government relations between tribal governments and the federal, state and local governments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Social Science Association, Albuquerque, NM.
24. Hauptman, L. M. (1992). Congress, plenary power, and the American Indian, 1870 to 1992. In O. Lyons & J. Mohawk (Eds.), Exiled in the land of the free: Democracy, Indian nations, and the U.S. Constitution (pp. 318-336). Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light.
25. Jorgensen, J. G. (1998). Gaming and recent American Indian economic development. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 22(3), 157-172. Retrieved from http://newfirstsearch.oclc.org/.
26. Katz, J. L. (1991). Lottery fatigue. Governing, 4(12), 62-66.
27. Lane, A. I. (1995). Return of the buffalo. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
28. Lawmakers may see casino issue again. (2000, December 22). Sun-News (Las Cruces, NM), p. A-8.
29. Mason, W. D. (2000). Indian gaming: Tribal sovereignty and American politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
30. McCulloch, A. M. (1999). The politics of Indian gaming: Tribal/state relations and American federalism. In R. L. Nichols (Ed.), The American Indian: Past and present (5th ed., pp. 301-311). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. McLanahan v. Arizona Tax Commission, 411 U.S. 164 (1973).
32. Mescaleros relieved to settle gaming compact feud. (2004, April 21). Las Cruces Sun-News, p. 8A.
33. Miles, D. (2001, November 22). Feds approve New Mexico gaming compacts. Albuquerque Journal, p. A1.
34. National Conference of State Legislatures. (2003). Are Indian tribes getting rich from casinos ? Retrieved March 31, 2003, from http://www.ncsl.org/ programs/esnr/gaming.htm/.
35. National Gambling Impact Study Commission. (1999). Final report. Retrieved from http://www.ngisc.gov/reports/finrpt.html/.
36. National Indian Gaming Association (NIGA). (2003). NICA resource library. Retrieved March 31, 2003, from http:/-/www.indiangaming.org/library/index.html/ .
37. National Indian Gaming Commission. (2002). Tribal gaming revenues. Retrieved March 31, 2003, from http://www.nigc.gov/.
38. O'Brien, S. (2002). Tribal governments. In J. M. Meyer (Ed.), American Indians and U.S. politics: A companion reader (pp. 41-47). Westport, CT: Praeger.
39. Popp, A., & Stehwien, C. (2002). Indian casino gambling and state revenues: Some further evidence. Public Finance Review, 30(4), 320-331.
40. Pritchett, C. H. (1984). Constitutional law of the federal system. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41. Reed, J. B., & Zelio, J. A. (1995). States and tribes: Building new traditions. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures.
42. Ridgeway, M. E. (1971). Interstate compacts: A question of federalism. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
43. Sandia Pueblo. (2000). Political and legal background of New Mexico tribal government gaming. Retrieved from http://www.sandiapueblo.nsn.us/gaming
44. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 116 U.S. 1114 (1996).
45. Slots net NM pueblos $96.5 million. (2002, May 4). Albuquerque Journal, p. A1.
46. State defends lawsuit over tribal casino pact. (2000). El Paso Times, p. 5B.
47. State of New Mexico v. Johnson, 120 N.M. 562 (1995).
48. Sylvester, K. (1992). Casinomania. Governing, 6(3), 22-26.
49. Urbanowicz, C. F. (1998). Comments on the "gaming industry": Big and getting bigger. Hotel Online Special Report. Retrieved from http://www.hotel-online.com/Neo/News/PressReleases 1999_2nd/Apr99_Urbanowicz1. html/.
50. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Jones, 448 U.S. 136 (1980).
51. Wilkins, D. E. (1994). Reconsidering the tribal-state compact process. Policy Studies Journal, 22(3), 474-488.
52. Wilson, J. M. (2001). Riverboat gambling and crime in Indiana: An empirical investigation. Crime & Delinquency, 47(4), 610-640.
53. Winchell, D. G., Lounsbury, J. F., & Sommers, L. (1997). Indian gaming in the U.S. Focus, 44(4), 1-10.
54. Worthen, K. J., & Farnsworth, W. R. (1996). Who will control the future of Indian gaming: A few pages of history are worth a volume of logic. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2, 407-449. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/.
55. Wright, D. S. (1988). Understanding intergovernmental relations (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.