Elastic modes of vortex configurations in thin disks

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 21, 2004, Pages 1-13

  Cabral, L R E ^a   Peeters, F M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPRESSION; ELASTICITY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; SHEAR STRESS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SUPERCONDUCTOR;

EID: 13844266264     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.214522     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. A. Houghton, R. A. Pelcovits, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B 40, 6763 (1989).
2. M. V. Feigel'man and V. M. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. B 41, 8986 (1990).
3. S. Sengupta, C. Dasgupta, H. R. Krishnamurthy, G. I. Menon, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3444 (1991).
4. G. Carneiro, R. Cavalcanti, and A. Gartner, Phys. Rev. B 47, 5263 (1993).
5. E. Zeldov, D. Majer, M. Konczykowski, V. B. Geshkenbein, V. M. Vinokur, and H. Shtrikman, Nature (London) 375, 373 (1995); D. Majer, E. Zeldov, and M. Konczykowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1166 (1995); A. Soibel, Y. Myasoedov, M. L. Rappaport, T. Tamegai, S. S. Banerjee, and E. Zeldov, ibid. 87, 167001 (2001).
6. E. Zeldov, D. Majer, M. Konczykowski, V. B. Geshkenbein, V. M. Vinokur, and H. Shtrikman, Nature (London) 375, 373 (1995); D. Majer, E. Zeldov, and M. Konczykowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1166 (1995); A. Soibel, Y. Myasoedov, M. L. Rappaport, T. Tamegai, S. S. Banerjee, and E. Zeldov, ibid. 87, 167001 (2001).
7. E. Zeldov, D. Majer, M. Konczykowski, V. B. Geshkenbein, V. M. Vinokur, and H. Shtrikman, Nature (London) 375, 373 (1995); D. Majer, E. Zeldov, and M. Konczykowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1166 (1995); A. Soibel, Y. Myasoedov, M. L. Rappaport, T. Tamegai, S. S. Banerjee, and E. Zeldov, ibid. 87, 167001 (2001).
8. H. Pastoriza and P. H. Kes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3525 (1995).
9. A. E. Koshelev, Phys. Rev. B 50, 506 (1994).
10. L. N. Bulaevskii and M. P. Maley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3541 (1993); L. N. Bulaevskii, J. H. Cho, M. P. Maley, P. Kes, Q. Li, M. Suenaga, and M. Ledvij, Phys. Rev. B 50, 3507 (1994).
11. L. N. Bulaevskii and M. P. Maley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3541 (1993); L. N. Bulaevskii, J. H. Cho, M. P. Maley, P. Kes, Q. Li, M. Suenaga, and M. Ledvij, Phys. Rev. B 50, 3507 (1994).
12. E. H. Brandt, Physica C 162-4, 1167 (1989); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 751 (1991).
13. E. H. Brandt, Physica C 162-4, 1167 (1989); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 751 (1991).
14. E. H. Brandt, J. Low Temp. Phys. 26, 709 (1977).
15. E. H. Brandt, J. Low Temp. Phys. 26, 735 (1977).
16. G. Blatter, M. V. Feigel'man, V. B. Geshkenbein, A. I. Larkin, and V. M. Vinokur, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1125 (1994).
17. E. H. Brandt, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 1465 (1995).
18. A. I. Buzdin and J. P. Brison, Phys. Lett. A 196, 267 (1994).
19. J. J. Palacios, Phys. Rev. B 58, R5948 (1998).
20. B. J. Baelus, F. M. Peeters, and V. A. Schweigert, Phys. Rev. B 63, 144517 (2001).
21. B. J. Baelus, L. R. E. Cabral, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 69, 064506 (2004).
22. L. R. E. Cabral, B. J. Baelus, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 70, 144523 (2004).
23. V. A. Schweigert and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 51, 7700 (1995).
24. M. Kong, B. Partoens, A. Matulis, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. E 69, 036412 (2004).
25. B. Partoens and P. S. Deo, Phys. Rev. B 69, 245415 (2004).
26. C. C. de Souza Silva and G. Carneiro, Phys. Rev. B 66, 054514 (2002).
27. C. C. de Souza Silva, J. A. Aguiar, and V. V. Moshchalkov, Phys. Rev. B 68, 134512 (2003).
28. A. Buzdin and M. Daumens, Physica C 294, 257 (1998); 332, 108 (2000).
29. A. Buzdin and M. Daumens, Physica C 294, 257 (1998); 332, 108 (2000).
30. E. H. Brandt and J. R. Clem, Phys. Rev. B 69, 184509 (2004).
31. B. Partoens and F. M. Peeters, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 5383 (1997).
32. Y. J. Lai and L. I, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4743 (1999).
33. C. P. Bean and J. D. Livingston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 14 (1964).
34. J. Bardeen and M. J. Stephen, Phys. Rev. 140, A1197 (1965).
35. D. Reefman and H. B. Brom, Physica C 183, 212 (1991).
36. C. C. de Souza Silva, L. R. E. Cabral, and J. A. Aguiar, Phys. Rev. B 63, 134526 (2001).
37. 0=0.2. Moreover, the ground-state configurations were the same for the L = 1 , . . . , 9 states.
38. 0, L=4 is the ground state in both the GL and the London theories (Ref. 18).
39. V. A. Schweigert and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2409 (1999).
40. It is worth mentioning that, for L < 9, the only other configuration which shows a change in the geometry before vortex expulsion was the L=(6) state. In the others a vortex is expelled when the configuration turns out to be a saddle point.
41. V. M. Bedanov and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 49, 2667 (1994).
42. I. V. Schweigert, V. A. Schweigen, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4381 (2000).
43. M. Kong, B. Partoens, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. E 67, 021608 (2003).
44. A. Melzer, Phys. Rev. E 67, 016411 (2003).
45. M.-C. Miguel and S. Zapperi, Nat. Mater. 2, 477 (2003).