Michael addition of ketone enolates to α,β-unsaturated esters or amides in a one-pot procedure: Highly efficient effect of lithium salt generated in situ on organotin enolate

Synthesis

Volumn , Issue 2, 2005, Pages 233-239

  Yasuda, Makoto ^a   Shigeyoshi, Yusuke ^a   Shibata, Ikuya ^a   Baba, Akio ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

High coordination; Ligand; Michael addition; Tin enolates; Unsaturated ester

Indexed keywords

ADDITION REACTIONS; ADDITIVES; COMPLEXATION; COORDINATION REACTIONS; ESTERS; INORGANIC ACIDS; POLYAMIDES; THERMODYNAMICS;

KETONE ENOLATES; LEWIS ACID; METAL ENOLATES; UNSATURATED ESTERS;

KETONES;

AMIDE; BROMIDE; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; DELTA KETO ESTER; ESTER; KETONE; KETONE ENOLATE; LEWIS ACID; LIGAND; LITHIUM BROMIDE; LITHIUM DERIVATIVE; LITHIUM SALT; MACROCYCLIC COMPOUND; METAL; METAL KETONE; ORGANOTIN COMPOUND; ORGANOTIN ENOLATE; SEC BUTYLLITHIUM; TRIBUTYLTIN; TRIBUTYLTIN BROMIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UNSATURATED ESTER;

ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; MICHAEL ADDITION; REACTION ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 13844264244     PISSN: 00397881     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-834933     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Trost, B. M. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 3; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991, 1-63.
2. Yasuda, M.; Chiba, K.; Ohigashi, N.; Katoh, Y.; Baba, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7291.
3. Hashimoto, Y.; Machida, S.; Saigo, K.; Inoue, J.; Hasegawa, M. Chem. Lett. 1989, 943.
4. Examples for types A-C: (a) Oare, D. A.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 157.
5. (b) Yamaguchi, M.; Tsukamoto, M.; Hirao, I. Chem. Lett. 1984, 375.
6. (a) For classical examples using a strong base for cycloalkanones, see: House, H. O.; Roelofs, W. L.; Trost, B. M. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 646.
7. (b) For reactions involving a subsequent step such as cyclization after Michael addition, see: Miller, J. J.; de Benneville, P. L. J. Org. Chem, 1957, 22, 1268.
8. (c) See also: Lee R. A.; Tetrahedron Lett.; 1973, 3333.
9. (d) For reactions using intramolecular strong interaction between Li and F, see: Yamazaki T., Haga J., Kitazume T., Nakamura S.; Chem. Lett.; 1991, 2171.
10. (e) See also: Yamazaki, T.; Hiraoka, S.; Kitazume, T. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5100.
11. A similar result was also observed when LDA was used instead of s-BuLi.
12. (a) Narasaka, K.; Soai, K.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 1974, 1223.
13. (b) Narasaka, K.; Soai, K.; Aikawa, Y.; Mukaiyama, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1976, 49, 779.
14. (a) The keto-enol tautomerization of the tin species of the Michael adduct causes thermodynamic stabilization: Yasuda, M.; Ohigashi, N.; Shibata, I.; Baba, A. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2180.
15. (b) Yasuda, M.; Ohigashi, N.; Baba, A. Chem. Lett. 2000, 1266.
16. LiCl generated in situ as a side product would not be a strong enough Lewis acid for type D reaction.
17. (a) Yasuda, M.; Chiba, K.; Baba, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7549.
18. (b) Yasuda, M.; Hayashi, K.; Katoh, Y.; Shibata, I.; Baba, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 715.
19. (c) Yasuda, M.; Katoh, Y.: Shibata, L; Baba, A.; Matsuda, H.; Sonoda, N. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4386.
20. (a) Zapata, A.; Acuna, C. A. Synth. Commun. 1984, 14, 27.
21. (b) Shimada, E.; Inomata, K.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 1974, 689.
22. Hiroi, K.; Yamada, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1973, 21, 47.
23. Pereyre, M.; Bellegarde, B.; Mendelsohn, J.; Valade, J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1968, 11, 97.