Data archiving in animal experimentation: Merits, challenges, and a case study

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 656-660

  Crystal, Jonathon D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b University of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13844256745     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206547     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
2. CATANIA, A. C. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and psychophysical judgments: A study of some temporal properties of behavior. In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 1-42). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3. CHURCH, R. M. (2002). The effective use of secondary data. Learning & Motivation, 33, 32-45.
4. CHURCH, R. M., & BROADBENT, H. A. (1990). Alternative representations of time, number, and rate. Cognition, 37, 55-81.
5. CHURCH, R. M., MECK, W. H., & GIBBON, J. (1994). Application of scalar timing theory to individual trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 135-155.
6. CRYSTAL, J. D. (1999). Systematic nonlinearities in the perception of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 3-17.
7. CRYSTAL, J. D. (2001a). Circadian time perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 68-78.
8. CRYSTAL, J. D. (2001b). Nonlinear time perception. Behavioural Processes, 55, 35-49.
9. CRYSTAL, J. D. (2003). Nonlinearities in sensitivity to time: Implications for oscillator-based representations of interval and circadian clocks. In W. H. Meck (Ed.), Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing (pp. 61-75). New York: CRC Press.
10. CRYSTAL, J. D. (2004). Sensitivity to time: Implications for the representation of time. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. DEWS, P. B. (1970). The theory of fixed-interval responding. In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 43-61). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12. GALLISTEL, C. R., & GIBBON, J. (2000). Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107, 289-344.
13. GIBBON, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279-325.
14. GIBBON, J. (1991). Origins of scalar timing. Learning & Motivation, 22, 3-38.
15. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (1996). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Guidelines for ethical conduct in the care and use of animals [Brochure] (1996). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. HENRY, J. P., & MOSLEY, J. D. (EDS.) (1963). Results of the Project Mercury ballistic and orbital chimpanzee flights: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA Special Publication SP-39). Washington, DC: Office of Scientific and Technical Information, NASA.
18. KILLEEN, P. R., & FETTERMAN, J. G. (1988). A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review, 95, 274-295.
19. KURTZMAN, H. S., CHURCH, R. M., & CRYSTAL, J. D. (2002). Data archiving for animal cognition research: Report of an NIMH workshop. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 405-412.
20. LATOUR, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. MULLEN, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. ROHLES, F. H., GRUNZKE, M. E., & REYNOLDS, H. H. (1962). A detailed account of chimpanzee performance during the ballistic and orbital Project Mercury flights (Technical Documentary Report ARL-TDR-62-15). Holloman AFB, NM: Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
23. WHEELWRIGHT, C. D. (1962). Physiological sensors for use in Project Mercury (NASA Technical Note TN D-1082). Houston, TX: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center.