User acceptance of intelligence and security informatics technology: A study of COPLINK

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 235-244

  Hu, Paul Jen Hwa ^a   Lin, Chienting ^b   Chen, Hsinchun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC PLATFORMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REAL-TIME SUBJECT MONITORING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; LAW ENFORCEMENT; SOFTWARE AGENTS;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 13844255245     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20124     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An assay of the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
4. Bagozzi, R.P., & Yi, Y. (1989). On the use of structural equation models in experimental design. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 271-284.
5. Blalock, H.M. (1985). Causal modeling in the social sciences. New York: Academic Press.
6. Chau, M., Atabakhsh, H., Zeng, D., & Chen, H. (2001, May). Building an infrastructure for law enforcement information sharing and collaboration: Design issues and challenges. Paper presented at the National Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o2001), Los Angeles, CA.
7. Chau, P.Y.K., & Hu, P.J. (2002). Examining a model for information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 191-229.
8. Chen, H., Miranda, R., Zeng, D.D., Demchak, C., Schroeder, J., & Madhusudan, T. (Eds.). (2003). Intelligence and security informatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2665. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
9. Chen, H., Schroeder, J., Hauck, R.V., Ridgeway, L., Atabakhsh, H., Gupta, H. et al. (2003). COPLINK connect: Information and knowledge management for law enforcement. Decision Support Systems, 34(3), 271-285.
10. Chen, H., Zeng, D., Atabakhsh, H., Wyzga, W., & Schroeder, J. (2003). COPLINK: Managing law enforcement data and knowledge. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 28-34.
11. Collopy, F. (1996). Biases in retrospective self-reports of time use: An empirical study of computer users. Management Science, 42(5), 758-767.
12. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
13. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
15. Fornell, C., & Larker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
16. Gattiker, U.E. (1984). Managing computer-based office information technology: A process model for management. In H. Hendrick & O. Brown (Eds.), Human factors in organizational design (pp. 395-403). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
17. Goldberger, A.S., & Duncan, O.D. (1973). Structural equation models in the social sciences. New York: Seminar Press.
18. Goodhue, D.L., & Thompson, R.L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
19. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Structural equation modeling. In Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed., pp. 616-688). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation of information systems use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-465.
21. Henry, J.W., & Stone, R.W. (1994). A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system. Information Resources Management Journal, 7, 21-33.
22. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G.B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-114.
23. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C.K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user's reference guide. Morresville, IN: Scientific Software.
25. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., & Chervany, N.L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of preadoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.
26. Keen, P. (1991). Shaping the future: Business design through information technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
27. Larson, M.S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
29. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W.W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86-112.
30. Melone, N.P. (1990). A theoretical assessment of user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Science, 36(1), 76-91.
31. Moore, G.C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
32. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Scott, J.E. (1994, December). The measurement of information systems effectiveness: Evaluating a measuring instrument. Paper presented at the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia.
34. Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P.R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325-343.
35. Straub, D. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 147-169.
36. Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85-92.
37. Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995a). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
38. Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995b). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
39. Thompson, R., Higgins, C., & Howell, J. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 167-187.
40. Tornatzky, L.G., & Klein, K.J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-44.
41. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
42. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. ( 1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
43. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
44. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M.G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influences, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-140.