Shear wave velocity modelling in crustal rock for seismic hazard analysis

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 167-185

  Chandler, A M ^a   Lam, N T K ^b   Tsang, H H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Crustal effects; Seismic hazard; Seismological model; Shear wave velocity

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; EARTHQUAKES; HAZARDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY;

CRYSTALLINE LAYERS; HAZARD MODELING; SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY; STABLE CONTINENTAL REGIONS (SCR);

SHEAR WAVES;

DATABASE; EARTHQUAKE; P-WAVE; S-WAVE; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC VELOCITY; VELOCITY PROFILE;

EID: 13744262087     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. A. Heidebrecht Insights and challenges associated with determining seismic design forces in a loading code Bull NZ Natl Soc Earthquake Eng 28 3 1995 224-246
2. R.E. Abercrombie Near-surface attenuation and site effects from comparison of surface and deep borehole recordings Bull Seismol Soc Am 87 1997 731-744
3. K. Sadigh C.Y. Chang J.A. Egan F. Makdisi R.R. Youngs Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on Californian strong motion data Seismol Res Lett 68 1 1997 180-189
4. N.A. Abrahamson W.J. Silva Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes Seismol Res Lett 68 1 1997 94-127
5. G.R. Toro N.A. Abrahamson J.F. Schneider Model of strong ground motion from earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: Best estimates and uncertainties Seismol Res Lett 68 1 1997 41-57
6. G.M. Atkinson D.M. Boore Some comparisons between recent ground-motion relations Seismol Res Lett 68 1 1997 24-40
7. A. Dahle H. Bungum L.B. Kvamme Attenuation models inferred from intraplate earthquake recordings J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 19 1990 1125-1141
8. N.N. Ambraseys K.A. Simpson J.J. Bommer Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 25 1996 371-400
9. G.L. Hutchinson N.T.K. Lam J.L. Wilson Determination of earthquake loading and seismic performance in intraplate regions Prog Struct Eng Mater 5 2003 181-194
10. B.A. Gaull M.O. Michael-Leiba J.M.W. Rynn Probabilistic earthquake risk maps of Australia Aust J Earth Sci 37 1990 169-187
11. N.T.K. Lam C. Sinadinovski R.C.H. Koo J.L. Wilson Peak ground velocity modelling for Australian earthquakes Int J Seismol Earthquake Eng 5 2 2003 11-22
12. W.D. Mooney G. Laske T.G. Masters CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5°×5° J Geophys Res 103 1998 727-747
13. Global Crustal Model CRUST2.0. Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics. The University of California, San Diego; 2001. Website: http://mahi.ucsd.edu/Gabi/rem.dir/crust/crust2.html
14. N.T.K. Lam A.M. Chandler Peak displacement demand of small to moderate magnitude earthquakes in stable continental regions J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2005 in press
15. N.T.K. Lam J.L. Wilson A.M. Chandler G.L. Hutchinson Response spectral relationships for rock sites derived from the component attenuation model J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 29 2000 1457-1489
16. N.T.K. Lam M.W. Asten A.M. Chandler H.H. Tsang S. Venkatesan J.L. Wilson Seismic attenuation modelling for Melbourne based on the SPAC-CAM procedure Proceedings of a conference of the Australian earthquake engineering Society, Mount Gambier, South Australia 2004 6 pp
17. G.S. Chulick W.D. Mooney Seismic structure of the crust and uppermost mantle of North America and adjacent oceanic basins: A synthesis Bull Seismol Soc Am 92 6 2002 2478-2492
18. L.Y. Faust Seismic velocity as a function of depth and geologic time Geophysics 16 1951 192-206
19. H. Magistrale K. McLaughlin S. Day A geological-based 3D velocity model of the Los Angeles basin sediments Bull Seismol Soc Am 86 4 1996 1161-1166
20. R.E. Sheriff L.P. Geldart Exploration seismology 1999 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, MA
21. D.M. Boore W.B. Joyner Site amplification for generic rock sites Bull Seismol Soc Am 87 2 1997 327-341
22. J.-P. Yang Y.P. Aggarwal Seismotectonics of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada J Geophys Res 86 B6 1981 4981-4998
23. E.F. Chiburis T. Graham Seismic networks in New England (abstract) Northeast Sect Geol Soc Am 10 1978 36
24. M.D. Patel G.A. McMechan Building 2-D stratigraphic and structure models from well log data and control horizons Comput Geosci 29 2003 557-567
25. B.C. Zelt R.M. Ellis R.M. Clowes E.R. Kanasewich I. Asudeh J.H. Luetgert et al. Crust and upper mantle velocity structure of the Intermontane belt, southern Canadian Cordillera Can J Earth Sci 29 1992 1530-1548
26. s with depth: Implications for appropriate velocity models, improved earthquake locations, and material properties of the upper crust Bull Seismol Soc Am 75 4 1985 1105-1129
27. Tam KW. Anisotropy in seismic wave velocity in jointed rocks in Hong Kong. MPhil Thesis. The University of Hong Kong; 2002.
28. Kwong JSM. Pilot study on the use of suspension PS logging. Technical note TN 2/98, GEO. Hong Kong Government; 1998.
29. L.R. Johnson W. Silva The effects of unconsolidated sediments upon the ground motion during local earthquakes Bull Seismol Soc Am 71 1 1981 127-142
30. R.J. Archuleta Analysis of near source static and dynamic measurements from the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake Bull Seismol Soc Am 72 1982 1927-1956
31. P.E. Malin M.H. Gillespie P.C. Leary T.L. Henyey Crustal structure near Palmdale, California, from borehole-determined ray parameters Bull Seismol Soc Am 71 1981 1783-1804
32. R.R. Stewart R.M. Turpening M.N. Toksoz Study of a subsurface fracture zone by vertical seismic profiling Geophys Res Lett 8 1981 1132-1135
33. R.D. Catchings M.J. Rymer M.R. Goldman J.A. Hole R. Huggins C. Lippus High-resolution seismic velocities and shallow structure of the San Andreas Fault Zone at Middle Mountain, Parkfield, CA Bull Seismol Soc Am 92 6 2002 2493-2503
34. R. Gritto T.M. Daley E.L. Majer Estimating subsurface topography from surface-to-borehole seismic studies at the Rye Patch geothermal reservoir, Nevada, USA Geothermics 32 2003 275-295
35. s velocity models of the Los Angeles basin and central Transverse Ranges, California J Geophys Res 102 B3 1997 5423-5453
36. w 4.6 Bolinas, California Bull Seismol Soc Am 93 1 2003 465-479
37. R.M. Hazlewood Preliminary report of seismic refraction survey along the east side of the San Francisco Bay, Alameda County, California US geological survey open-file report 1974 10 pp
38. T.L. Pratt J.F. Mondary L.D. Brown N.I. Christensen S.H. Danbom Crustal structure and deep reflector properties: Wide angle shear and compressional wave studies of the midcrustal surrency bright spot beneath southeastern Georgia J Geophys Res 98 B10 1993 17723-17735
39. s, and Poisson's ratio across earthquake source zones from Memphis, Tennessee, to St Louis, Missouri Bull Seismol Soc Am 89 6 1999 1591-1605
40. W.D. Mooney M.C. Andrews A. Ginzburg D.A. Peters R.M. Hamilton Crustal structure of the northern Mississippi Embayment and comparison with other continental rift zones Tectonophysics 94 1983 327-348
41. K. McCamy R.P. Meyer Crustal results of fixed multiple shots in the Mississippi Embayment In: J.S. Steinhart T.J. Smith editors The earth beneath the continents American geophysical union geophysics monograph vol. 10 1966 370-381
42. W.R. Peltier Ice age paleotopography Science 265 1994 195-201
43. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions Report No. TR-102293 vols. 1-5 1993 Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Palo Alto, California
44. R.M. Hazlewood Preliminary report of seismic refraction survey along the east side of the San Francisco Bay, Alameda County, California US geological survey open-file report 1974 10 pp
45. E. Hauksson Crustal structure and seismicity distribution adjacent to the Pacific and North America plate boundary in southern California J Geophys Res 105 B6 2000 13875-13903
46. W.J. Silva R.B. Darragh Engineering characterization of strong ground motion recorded at rock sites Report No. TR-102262 1995 Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Palo Alto, California