Mammographic findings in breast cancer patients, who were treated with breast conserving therapy

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 87, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1439-1443

  Tangkaratt, Saipin ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Thailand)

Author keywords

CA breast; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY;

ADULT; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 13744258946     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Veronesi U, Banfi A, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: Long-term results. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 1986; 22: 1085-9.
2. Blichert-Toft M. A Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation with mastectomy in mammary carcinoma. Br J Cancer 1990; 62(Suppl 12): 15.
3. Bader J, Lippman ME, Swain SM, et al. Preliminary report of the NCl early breast cancer (BC) study: A prospective randomized comparison of lumpectomy and radiation (XRT) to mastectomy (M) for stage 1 and 11 BC. Int J radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987; 13(Suppl 1): 160.
4. Sarrazin D, Le MG, Arrigada R, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 1989; 14: 177-84.
5. Feig SA, D'Oris CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 29-33.
6. Smart CR, Byrne C, Smithe RA, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of breast diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47: 134-49.
7. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al: The Swedish Two Country Trial twenty-year later: Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38: 625-51.
8. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184: 613-7.
9. Van Dijck JAMM, Verbreek ALM, Hendrisk JHCL, et al. The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program: A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen-detected cancers. Cancer 1993; 72: 1933-8.
10. Thurijell EL, Lamevall KA, Taube AS. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191: 241-4.
11. Hulka CA, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, el at. Value of double reading in screening mammography. Radiology 1994; 193: 239.
12. Harms SE, Flaming DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: Clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187: 493-501.
13. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, et al. Suspecious breast lesion: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190: 485-93.
14. Lee CH, Smith RC, Levine JA, et al. Clinical usefulness of MR imaing of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 1323-9.
15. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: Use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171: 95-103.