Single vs. double data entry [1]

Epidemiology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 130-131

  Büchele, Gisela ^a   Och, Birgit ^a   Bolte, Gabriele ^a   Weiland, Stephan K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; COST; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LETTER; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

DATA COLLECTION; DATABASES; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 13744252476     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000147166.24478.f4     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA). ICH Topic E 6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Step 5 Consolidated Guideline 1. 5.96. Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95), 2002. http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/ich/013595en.pdf.
2. Bellach BM, Hense HW, Hoffmann W. Arbeitsgruppe Epidemiologische Methoden der DAE. Leitlinien und Empfehlungen zur Sicherung von Guter Epidemiologischer Praxis (GEP). 1999. http://www.rki.de/GESUND/EPIDEM/GEP_ LANG.PDF.
3. Whitney CW, Lind BK, Wahl PW. Quality assurance and quality control in longitudinal studies. Epidemiol Rev. 1998;20:71-80.
4. Gibson D, Harvey AJ, Everett V, Parmar MKB, on behalf of the CHART Steering Committee. Is double data entry necessary? The CHART trials. Control Clin Trials. 1994;15:482-488.
5. Day S, Payers P, Harvey D. Double data entry: what value, what price? Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:15-24.