Pathological stage does not alter the prognosis for renal lesions determined to be stage T1 by computerized tomography

Journal of Urology

Volumn 173, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 713-715

  Roberts, William W ^a   Bhayani, Sam B ^b   Allaf, Mohamad E ^c   Chan, Theresa Y ^c   Kavoussi, Louis R ^c   Jarrett, Thomas W ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carcinoma, renal cell; Kidney; Neoplasm staging; Tomography, emission computed

Indexed keywords

CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; KIDNEY CAPSULE; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURVIVAL; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 13744250776     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000153638.15018.58     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Guinan, P., Sobin, L. H., Algaba, F., Badellino, F., Kameyama, S., MacLennan, G. et al: TNM staging of renal carcinoma: Workgroup No. 3. Union International Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer, 80: 992, 1997
2. Tsui, K.-H., Schvarts, O., Smith, R. B., Figlin, R., deKernion, J. B. and Belldegrun, A.: Renal cell carcinoma: prognostic significance of incidentally detected tumors. J Urol, 163: 426, 2000
3. Gettman, M. T. and Blute, M. L.: Update on pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma. Urology, 60: 209, 2002
4. Gofrit, O. N., Shapiro, A., Kovalski, N., Landau, E. H., Shenfeld, O. Z. and Pode, D.: Renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of the 1997 TNM system and recommendations for follow-up after surgery. Eur Urol, 39: 669, 2001
5. Ficarro, V., Righetti, R., Pilloni, S., D'Amico, A., Mafei, N., Novella, G. et al: Prognostic factors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: retrospective analysis of 675 cases. Eur Urol, 41: 190, 2002
6. Tsui, K.-H., Shvarts, O., Smith, R. B., Figlin, R. A., deKernion, J. B. and Belldegrun, A.: Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol, 163: 1090, 2000
7. Sheth, S., Scatarige, J. C., Horton, K. M., Corl, F. M. and Fishman, E. K.: Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma: role of multidetector CT and three-dimensional CT. Radiographics, 21: S237, 2001
8. Pantuck, A. J., Zisman, A. and Belldegrun, A. S.: The changing natural history of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 166: 1611, 2001
9. Jayson, M. and Sanders, H.: Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology, 51: 203, 1998
10. Han, K.-R., Bui, M. H. T., Pantuck, A. J., Freitas, D. G., Leibovich, B. C., Dorey, F. J. et al: TNM T3a renal cell carcinoma: adrenal gland involvement is not the same as renal fat invasion. J Urol, 169: 899, 2003