How ngos monitor projects for impacts: Results of recent research

Impact Assessment

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 241-268

  Eckman, Karlyn ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b 115 Green Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13644279412     PISSN: 07349165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07349165.1996.9725903     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Babbie, Earl R., 1975. The Practice of Social Research., Belmont:Wadsworth.
2. Bunch, Roland. 1982. Two Ears of Com:A Guide to People-Centered Agricultural Improvement., Oklahoma City:World Neighbors.
3. Canter, Larry W., 1993. “The role of environmental monitoring in responsible project management.”. The Environmental Professional, 15:76–87.
4. Chambers, Robert. 1983. Rural Development:Putting the Last First., Essex:Longman.
5. Dalai-Clayton, Barry. 1992. “Modified EIA and indicators of stistainability:first steps toward stistainability analysis.”. In International Association for Impact Assessment conference program. 134–146. Washington, DC August 19–22 1992
6. Dillman, Don A., 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys:The Total Design Method., New York:John Wiley & Sons.
7. Doolette, J. B., and McGrath, W. B., 1990. Watershed Development in Asia:Strategies and Technologies., Washington, DC:World Bank. World Bank Technical Paper 27
8. Easter, William K., July 1986. Monitoring and Evaluation for Integrated River Basin Development and Watershed Management., July, St. Paul:University of Minnesota. Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics. Staff Paper P86–27
9. Eckman, Karlyn. 1993. “Using indicators of unsustainability in development programs.”. Impact Assessment, 11 (3):275–287.
10. Eckman, Karlyn. 1994. Avoiding Unsustainability in Natural Resources Projects in Developing Countries:The Precautionary Monitoring Approach., Ph.D. dissertation St. Paul:University of Minnesota College of Natural Resources. 253 pages.
11. Eckman, K., 1995. “Avoiding unsustainable development:the role of monitoring in natural resources projects.”, Saint Paul:University of Minnesota College of Natural Resources. Draft policy brief (Rev. 12/95)
12. Eckman. Karlyn. Forthcoming (a). Precautionary monitoring In preparation for submission to Impact Assessment.
13. Eckman. Karlyn. Forthcoming (b). Monitoring the environmental and socioeconomic Impacts of relief and development projects
14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 1989. Community Forestry:Participatory Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation., Rome:FAO. Community Forestry Note 2
15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 1990. The Community's Toolbox:The Idea, Methods, and Tools for Participatory Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation in Community Forestry., Rome:FAO. Community Forestry Field Manual 2
16. Gregersen, Hans, and Lundgren, Allen. 1989. Linking monitoring and assessment to sustainable development, Saint Paul:University of Minnesota College of Natural Resources. FFSD working paper 2
17. Hoekstra, D. A., September 1987. Gathering socio- and bio-economic data for agro-forestry projects, September, Nairobi:International Council for Research in Agroforestry. Working paper 50
18. Jiggins, Janice. 1995. “Development impact assessment:impact assessment of aid projects in nonwestern countries.”. Impact Assessment, 13 (1):47–69.
19. Josiah, S., and Eckman, K., April 1995. “NGOs. donors, and the state:working together to manage natural resources.”, April, Saint Paul:University of Minnesota College of Natural Resources. EPAT/MUCIA/USAID draft policy brief
20. Korten, David C., and Klauss, Rudi. 1984. People-Centered Development:Contributions toward Theory and Planning Frameworks., West Hartford:Kumarian Press.
21. Lemons, Kenneth E., and Alan Porter, L., 1992. “A comparative study of impact assessment methods in developed and developing countries.”. Impact Assessment Bulletin, 10 (3):57–65.
22. Myers, Norman. 1988. Natural Resource Systems and Human Exploitation Systems:Physiobiotic and Ecological Linkages., Washington, DC:World Bank. Environment Department working paper No. 12
23. Otto, Jonathan. November 1993. Seeking Success:Where and How to Look for Success Factors in USAID/NGO Natural Resource Management Projects in Africa., November, Washington, DC:USDA Forest Service Forestry Support Program (FSP).
24. Rahmato, Dessalegn. 1991. Famine and Survival Strategies., Uppsala:Nordiska Afrikainstitute.
25. Raintree, J. B., 1987. D & D User's Manual:An Introduction to Agroforestry Diagnosis and Design., Nairobi:ICRAF.
26. Salmen, Lawrence F., 1987. Listen to the People:Participant-Observer Evaluation of Development Projects., New York:Oxford.
27. Sclierr, S. J., and Miiller, E. U., 1989. “What happens in agroforestry development projects?”. Agroforestry Today, 1 (4):8–13.
28. Sclierr, S. J., and Miiller, E. U., 1991. “Technology impact evaluation in agroforestry projects.”. Agroforestry Systems, 13:235–257.
29. Uphoff, Norman. 1990. “Paraprojects as new modes of international development assistance.”. World Development, 18 (10):1401–1411.
30. World Resources Institute (WRI). 1992. World Resources 1992–1993:A Guide to the Global Environment., New York:Oxford.