The interminable issue of effectiveness: Substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 295-310

  Cashmore, Matthew ^a   Gwilliam, Richard ^b   Morgan, Richard ^c   Cobb, Dick ^a   Bond, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b Hyder Consulting   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Decision making; Effectiveness; Environmental impact assessment; Sustainable development; Theory

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PLANNING THEORY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 13644271829     PISSN: 14615517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154604781765860     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Abaza, H., 2000. “Strengthening future environmental assessment practice:an international perspective”. In Environmental Assessment in Developing and Transitional Countries, Edited by:Lee, N., and George, C., 271–282. Chichester:John Wiley and Sons.
2. Bailey, J. M., and Hobbs, V., 1990. “A proposed framework and database for EIA auditing”. Journal of Environmental Management, 31:163–172.
3. Barker, A., and Wood, C., 1999. “An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19:387–404.
4. Bartlett, R. V., 1986. “Rationality and the logic of the National Environmental Policy Act”. The Environmental Professional, 8:105–111.
5. Bartlett, R. V., 1988. “Policy and impact assessment:An introduction”. Impact Assessment Bulletin, 6:73–74.
6. Bartlett, R. V., and Kurian, P. A., 1999. “The theory of environmental impact assessment:implicit models of policy making”. Policy and Politics, 27:415–434.
7. Bateman, I. J., 1999. “Environmental impact assessment, cost-benefit analysis and the valuation of environmental impacts” Edited by:Petts. 93–120. 1999c)
8. Beanlands, G. E., and Duinker, P. N., 1983. An Ecological Framework for Environmental Impact Assessment in Canada, Nova Scotia, Canada:Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University.
9. Beattie, R. B., 1995. “Everything you already know about EIA (but don't often admit)”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15:109–114.
10. Bendix, S., 1984. “How to write a socially useful EIS”. In Improving Impact Assessment:increasing the relevance and utilisation of scientific and technical information, Edited by:Hart, S. L., Enk, G. A., and Hornick, W. F., 271–288. London:Westview Press.
11. Benson, J. F., 2003. “What's the alternative? Impact assessment tools and sustainable planning”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21 (4):261–266.
12. Bond, A., 2003. “Let's not be rational about this”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21 (4):266–269.
13. Bond, A., Langstaff, L., Baxter, R., Kofoed, H., Lisitzin, K., and Lund-ström, S., 2004. “Dealing with the cultural heritage aspect of EIA in European developments”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22 (1):37–45.
14. Bond, A. J., and Wathern, P., 1999. “Environmental impact assessment in the European Union” Edited by:Petts. 223–248. 1999d)
15. Brown, L. A., and Hill, R. C., 1995. “Decision-scoping:making EA learn how the design process works”. Project Appraisal, 12 (4):223–232.
16. Caldwell, L. K., 1991. “Analysis-assessment-decision:the anatomy of rational policymaking”. Impact Assessment Bulletin, 9:81–92.
17. Caldwell, L. K., 1993. “Achieving the NEPA intent:new directions in politics, science, and law”. In Environmental Analysis. The NEPA Experience, Edited by:Cannon, J. B., and Hildebrand, S. G., 12–21. London:Lewis Publishers.
18. Caldwell, L. K., 1998. “Implementing policy through procedure:impact assessment and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)”. In Environmental Methods Review:retooling impact assessment for the new century, Edited by:Porter, A. L., and Fittipaldi, J. J., 8–14. Fargo, ND:The Press Club.
19. Cashmore, M., 2004. “The role of science in environmental impact assessment:process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24 (4):403–426.
20. Clark, B. D., 1999. “Capacity building” Edited by:Petts. 35–54. 1999d)
21. Crawley, K., 2003. Improving the quality of the non-technical summary in the UK, Norwich:School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia. unpublished MSc Dissertation
22. Culhane, P., 1974. “Federal agency organizational change in response to environmentalism”. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 2:31–44.
23. Culhane, P. J., Friesema, H. P., and Beecher, J. A., 1987. Forecasts and Environmental Decisionmaking. The content and predictive accuracy of environmental impact statements, London:Westview Press.
24. Deelstra, Y., Notteboom, S. G., Kohlmann, H. R., van den Berg, J., and Innanen, S., 2003. “Using knowledge for decision-making purposes in the context of large projects in the Netherlands”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23:517–541.
25. Department of the Environment. 1995. Preparation of Environmental Statements for Planning Projects that Require Environmental Assessment:a good practice guide, London:Stationery Office.
26. Department of the Environment. 1996. Changes in the Quality of Environmental Statements for Planning Projects, London:HMSO.
27. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. 1999. Environmental Impact Assessment, London:Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. circular 02/99
28. Dixon, J. E., Ericksen, N. J., Crawford, J. L., and Berke, P., 1997. “Planning under a co-operative mandate:new plans for New Zealand”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40 (5):603–614.
29. Doyle, D., and Sadler, B., 1996. Environmental Assessment in Canada:frameworks, procedures and attributes of effectiveness, Ottawa:Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
30. Duinker, P. N., 1985. “Forecasting environmental impacts:better quantitative and wrong than qualitative and untestable”. In Audit and Evaluation in Environmental Assessment and Management:Canadian and international experience, Edited by:Sadler, B., 399–407. School of Management, Environment Canada and the Banff Centre.
31. Duthie, A. G., 2001. “A review of provincial environmental impact assessment administrative capacity in South Africa”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19 (3):215–222.
32. Emmelin, L., 1998. “Evaluating environmental impact assessment systems — Part 1:Theoretical and methodological considerations”. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 15:129–148.
33. Ensminger, J. T., and McLean, R. B., 1993. “Reasons and strategies for more effective NEPA implementation”. The Environmental Professional, 15:45–56.
34. Feldmann, L., Vanderhaegen, M., and Pirotte, C., 2001. “The EU's SEA Directive:status and links to integration and sustainable development”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21:203–222.
35. Frost, R., 1997. “EIA monitoring and audit”. In Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice, Edited by:Weston, J., 141–164. Harlow:Addison Wesley Longman.
36. Gallagher, T. J., and Patrick-Riley, K., 1989. “The readability of federal land management plans”. Environmental Management, 13 (1):85–90.
37. Gamble, A., 1981. An Introduction to Modern Social and Political Thought, London:Macmillan.
38. George, C., 1999. “Testing for sustainable development through environmental assessment”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19:175–200.
39. Glasson, J., 1999. “Environmental impact assessment — impact on decisions” Edited by:Petts. 121–144. 1999c)
40. Glasson, J., Therivel, R., Weston, J., Wilson, E., and Frost, R., 1997. “EIA — learning from experience:changes in the quality of environmental impact statements for UK planning projects”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40 (4):451–464.
41. Glasson, J., Therivel, R., and Chadwick, A., 1999. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, second edition, London:Spon Press.
42. Gwilliam, R. S., 2002. The Integration of Environmental Impact Assessment into Development Control and Planning Decisions:the perception of English planning officers, Norwich:School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia. unpublished dissertation
43. Jones, C. E., and Wood, C., 1995. “The impact of environmental assessment on public inquiry decisions”. Journal of Planning and Environmental Law,:890–904. October
44. Kobus, D., and Lee, N., 1993. “The role of environmental assessment in the planning and authorisation of extractive industry projects”. Project Appraisal, 8 (3):147–156.
45. Krønøv, L., and Thissen, W. A H. 2000. “Rationality in decision-and policy-making:implications for strategic environmental assessment”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18 (3):191–200.
46. Kuhn, T., 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second edition, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
47. Lawrence, D. P., 1994. “Designing and adapting the EIA planning process”. The Environmental Professional, 16:2–21.
48. Lawrence, D. P., 1997. “The need for EIA theory-building”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 17:79–107.
49. Lawrence, D. P., 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment:practical solutions to recurrent problems, Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley and Sons.
50. Lee, B., Haworth, L., and Brunk, C., 1995. “Values and science in impact assessment”. Environments, 23 (1):93–100.
51. Lee, N., 1995. “Environmental assessment in the European Union:a tenth anniversary”. Project Appraisal, 10 (2):79–90.
52. Lee, N., and Brown, D., 1992. “Quality control in environmental assessment”. Project Appraisal, 7 (1):41–45.
53. Lee, N., and Colley, R., 1992. “Reviewing the quality of environmental statements”, second edition, EIA Centre, University of Manchester. Occasional Paper no 24
54. Lee, N., Colley, R., Bonde, J., and Simpson, J., 1999. “Reviewing the quality of environmental statements and environmental appraisals”, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester. occasional paper number 55
55. Lee, N., Walsh, F., and Reeder, G., 1994. “Assessing the performance of the EA process”. Project Appraisal, 9 (3):161–172.
56. Lemons, J., 1995. “Science and the National Environmental Policy Act”. In Readings from the Environmental Professional. National Environmental Policy Act, Edited by:Lemons, J., 198–203. Oxford:Blackwell Science.
57. Leu, W., Williams, W. P., and Bark, A. W., 1996. “Environmental assessment”. Project Appraisal, 11 (1):2–12.
58. Liebow, E., 1993. “Who is expert at interpreting environmental hazards? A commentary on the disabling effects on an expert/layperson dichotomy”. The Environmental Professional, 15:288–292.
59. Lindblom, C., 1959. “The science of muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19:79–88.
60. McDonald, G. T., and Brown, L., 1995. “Going beyond environmental impact assessment:environmental input to planning and design”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15:483–495.
61. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., and Randers, J., 1992. Beyond the Limits:global collapse or a sustainable future, London:Earthscan.
62. Miller, A., 1993. “The role of analytical science in natural resource decision making”. Environmental Management, 17 (5):563–574.
63. Miller, R. E., 1984. “The EIS and the decision maker:closing the gap”. In Improving Impact Assessment:increasing the relevance and utilisation of scientific and technical information, Edited by:Hart, S. L., Enk, G. A., and Hornick, W. F., 289–311. London:Westview Press.
64. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment and Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries. 1994. Use and Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessments in Decision Making, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands:Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
65. Morgan, R., 1995. “Progress with implementing the environmental assessment requirements of the Resource Management Act in New Zealand”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38 (3):333–348.
66. Morgan, R., 1998. Environmental Impact Assessment:a methodological perspective, London:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
67. Mostert, E., 1996. “Subjective environmental impact assessment:causes, problems, solutions”. Impact Assessment, 14:191–213.
68. Munn, R. E., 1979. Environmental Impact Assessment:Principles and Procedures, second edition, Chichester:Wiley.
69. Nelson, P., 1994. “Better guidance for better EIA”. Built Environment, 20 (4):280–294.
70. Netherlands Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment. 1996. Country Status Reports on EIA, The Hague:Netherlands Commission for EIA.
71. Nilsson, M., and Dalkmann, H., 2001. “Decision making and strategic environmental assessment”. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3 (3):305–327.
72. Nitz, T., and Brown, A. L., 2001. “SEA must learn how policy making works”. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3 (3):329–342.
73. Nitz, T., and Holland, I., 2000. “Does environmental impact assessment facilitate environmental management activities?”. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2 (1):1–17.
74. O'Riordan, T., 1993. “The politics of sustainability”. In Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management:principles and practice, Edited by:Turner, R. K., 37–69. Chichester:John Wiley and Sons.
75. O'Riordan, T., 2001. “Environmental science on the move”. In Environmental Science for Environmental Management, Edited by:O'Riordan, T., 1–27. Harlow:Prentice Hall.
76. O'Riordan, T., and Sewell, W. R D. 1981. “From project appraisal to policy review”. In Project Appraisal and Policy Review, Edited by:O'Riordan, T., and Sewell, W. R D. 1–28. Chichester:John Wiley and Sons.
77. Pearce, D., Markandya, A., and Barbier, E., 1989. Blueprint for a Green Economy, London:Earthscan.
78. Petts, J., 1999a. “Introduction to environmental impact assessment in practice:fulfilling potential or wasted opportunity?” Edited by:Petts. 3–9. 1999d)
79. Petts, J., 1999b. “Public participation and environmental impact assessment” Edited by:Petts. 145–177. 1999c)
80. Petts, J., 1999c. Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment. Volume 1. Environmental Impact Assessment:process, methods and potential, Oxford:Blackwell Science.
81. Petts, J., 1999d. Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment. Volume 2. Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice:impacts and limitations, Oxford:Blackwell Science.
82. Phillips, F., 2002. “The distortion of criteria after decision-making”. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88:769–784.
83. Rosenberg, D., Resh, V. H., Balling, S. S., Barnby, M. A., Collins, J. N., Durbin, D. V., Flynn, T. S., Hart, D. D., Lamberti, G. A., McElravy, E. P., Wood, J. R., Blank, T. E., Schultz, D. M., Marrin, D. L., and Price, D. G., 1981. “Recent trends in environmental impact assessment”. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 38:591–624.
84. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. 1998. Setting Environmental Standards, London:The Stationery Office. 21st report
85. Sadler, B., 1996. Environmental Assessment in a Changing World:evaluating practice to improve performance, Ottawa:Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and International Association for Impact Assessment, Ministry of Supply Services. final report of the International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment
86. Sadler, B., 1999. “A framework for environmental sustainability assessment and assurance” Edited by:Petts. 12–32. 1999c)
87. Sadler, B., and Jacobs, P., 1989. “A key to tomorrow:on the relationship of environmental assessment and sustainable development”. In Environmental Assessment and Sustainable Development:perspectives on planning for a common future, Edited by:Jacobs, P., and Sadler, B., 3–31. Ottawa, Canada:Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council.
88. Shepherd, A., and Bowler, C., 1997. “Beyond the requirements:Improving public participation in EIA”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40 (6):725–738.
89. Shoemaker, P. J., Tankard, J. W., and Lasorsa, D. L., 2004. How to Build Social Science Theories, London:Sage Publications.
90. Simon, H., 1957. Administrative Behaviour, London:Macmillan.
91. Singleton, R. A., and Straits, B. C., 1999. Approaches to Social Research, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
92. Sullivan, W. C., Kuo, F. E., and Prabhu, M., 1996. “Assessing the impact of environmental impact statements on citizens”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16:171–182.
93. ten Heuvelhof, E., and Nauta, C., 1997. “The effects of environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands”. Project Appraisal, 12 (1):25–30.
94. Turner, R. K., 1993. “Sustainability:principles and practice”. In Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management:principles and practice, Edited by:Turner, R. K., 3–36. Chichester:John Wiley and Sons.
95. Vanclay, F., 2003. Social Impact Assessment:international principles, Fargo, ND:International Association for Impact Assessment.
96. Walters, C. J., 1993. “Dynamic models and large scale field experiments in environmental impact assessment and management”. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18:53–61.
97. Wathern, P., 1988. “An introductory guide to EIA”. In Environmental Impact Assessment:theory and practice, Edited by:Wathern, P., 3–30. London:Routledge.
98. Weinberg, A., 1972. “Science and trans-science”. Minerva, 10:209–222.
99. Weiss, E., 1989. “An unreadable EIS is an environmental hazard”. The Environmental Professional, 11:236–240.
100. Weston, J., 2000. “EIA, decision-making and screening and scoping in UK practice”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43 (2):185–200.
101. Wilkins, H., 2003. “The need for subjectivity in EIA:Discourse as a tool for sustainable development”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23:401–414.
102. Wood, C., 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment. a comparative review, second edition, Harlow:Prentice Hall.
103. Wood, C., Barker, A., Jones, C., and Hughes, J., 1996. Evaluation of the Performance of the EIA Process. Volume 1:Main report, Luxembourg:Commission of the European Communities.
104. Wood, C., and Jones, C. E., 1997. “The effect of environmental assessment on UK local planning authority decisions”. Urban Studies, 34 (8):1237–1257. available at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/carfax/00420980.html, last accessed 27 February 2004
105. Wood, C., Dipper, B., and Jones, C. E., 2000. “Auditing the assessment of the environmental impacts of planning projects”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43 (1):23–47.
106. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future, Oxford:Oxford University Press.