Bringing MRI to the cardiologist: Can we learn from echocardiography?

Current Cardiology Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 65-69

  Sorrell, Vincent L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; GATED IMAGING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IONIZING RADIATION; NEPHROTOXICITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REVIEW;

EID: 13644264882     PISSN: 15233782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-005-0013-7     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. American Heart Association: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2004 update. Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3018163.
2. Henry WL, DeMaria A, Gramiak R, et al.: Report of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Nomenclature and Standards in Two-dimensional Echocardiography. Circulation 1980, 62:212-217.
3. Shan K, Constantine G, Sivananthan M, Flamm SD: Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of myocardial viability. Circulation 2004, 109:1328-1334.
4. Kim RJ, Shah DJ: Fundamental concepts in myocardial viability assessment revisited: when knowing how much is "alive" is not enough. Heart 2004, 90:137-140.
5. Lee VS, Resnick D, Tiu SS, et al.: MR imaging evaluation of myocardial viability in the setting of equivocal SPECT results with (99m) Tc sestamibi. Radiology 2004, 230: 91-197.
6. Kim RJ, Manning WJ: Viability assessment by delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: will low-dose dobutamine dull the shine? Circulation 2004, 109:2476-2479.
7. Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, et al.: Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2004, 147:218-223.
8. Bluemke DA, Krupinski EA, Ovitt T, et al.: MR imaging of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: morphologic findings and interobserver reliability. Cardiology 2003, 99: 53-162.
9. Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, et al.: Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000, 2:15-22.
10. NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al.: Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J 2000, 16:1387-1396.
11. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al.: Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989, 2:358-367.
12. Armstrong WF, Pellikka PA, Ryan T, et al.: Stress echocardiography: recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography. Stress Echocardiography Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998, 11:97-104.
13. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, et al.: Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002, 15:167-184.
14. Pearlman AS, Gardin JM, Martin RP, et al.: Guidelines for physician training in transesophageal echocardiography: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee for Physician Training in Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992, 5:187-194.
15. Rychik J, Ayres N, Cuneo B, et al.: American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and standards for performance of the fetal echocardiogram. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004, 17:803-810.
16. Seward JB, Douglas PS, Erbel R, et al.: Hand-carried cardiac ultrasound (HCU) device: recommendations regarding new technology. A report from the Echocardiography Task Force on New Technology of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002, 15: 69-373.
17. Gardin JM, Adams DB, Douglas PS, et al.: American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for a standardized report for adult transthoracic echocardiography: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee and Task Force for a Standardized Echocardiography Report. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002, 15:275-290.
18. Stewart WJ, Douglas PS, Sagar K, et al.: Echocardiography in emergency medicine: a policy statement by the American Society of Echocardiography and the American College of Cardiology. Task Force on Echocardiography in Emergency Medicine of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Echocardiography and Technology and Practice Executive Committees of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999, 33:586-588.
19. Bommer WJ, Shah PM, Allen H, et al.: The safety of contrast echocardiography: report of the Committee on Contrast Echocardiography for the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984, 3:6-13.
20. Recommendations for continuous quality improvement in echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995, 8(5 Pt 2):1-28.
21. Waggoner AD, Ehler D, Adams D, et al.: Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council on Cardiac Sonography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001, 14:417-420.
22. Ehler D, Carney DK, Dempsey AL, et al.: American Society of Echocardiography Sonographer Training and Education Committee Guidelines for cardiac sonographer education: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Sonographer Training and Education Committee. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001, 14:77-84.
23. Gardner CJ, Brown S, Hagen-Ansert S, et al.: Guidelines for cardiac sonographer education: report of the American Society of Echocardiography Sonographer Education and Training Committee. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992, 5:635-639.
24. Firmin D, Keegan J: Navigator echoes in cardiac magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001, 3:183-193.
25. Guidelines for credentialing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Clinical Practice Committee. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000, 2: 33-234.
26. Pennell DJ, Underwood SIR: Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [Comment in Eur Heart J 2000, 21:1295-1297]. Eur Heart J 2000, 21:1387-1396.
27. Nagel E, Lorenz C, Baer F, et al.: Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: consensus panel report. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001, 3:267-281.
28. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al.: Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002, 105:539-542.
29. Kim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM: How we perform delayed enhancement imaging [Erratum in J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003, 5:613-615]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003, 5:505-514.
30. Rehwald WG, Fieno DS, Chen EL, et al.: Myocardial magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent concentrations after reversible and irreversible ischemic injury. Circulation 2002, 105: 24-229.
31. Sanz J, Rius T, Kuschnir P, et al.: Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability using cardiac magnetic resonance. Curr Cardiol Rep 2004, 6:62-69.
32. Bellenger NG, Francis JM, Davies CL, et al.: Establishment and performance of a magnetic resonance cardiac function clinic. Am J Card Imaging 1991, 5:139-149.
33. Wolff SD, Comeau CR: Setting up a clinical cardiac MR imaging program: practical issues and economics. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2003, 11:19-26.