Dqfem analyses of static and dynamic nonlinear elastic-plastic problems using a gsr-based accelerated constant stiffness equilibrium iteration technique

Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME

Volumn 123, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 310-317

  Chen, Chang New ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13644257821     PISSN: 00949930     EISSN: 15288978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1374205     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chen, C. N., 1990, “Improved Constant Stiffness Algorithms for the Finite Element Analysis,” Proc., NUMETA 90, Swansea, UK, pp. 623-628.
2. Chen, C. N., 1992, “Efficient and Reliable Accelerated Constant Stiffness Algorithms for the Solution of Non-linear Problems,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 35, pp. 481-490.
3. Ponthot, J. P. and Hogge, M., 1994, “On Relative Merits of Implicit/Explicit Algorithms for Transient Problems in Metal Forming Simulation,” Proc., International Conference on Numerical Methods for Metal Forming in Industry, Baden-Baden, GERMANY, 2, pp. 128-148.
4. Chen, C. N., 1998, “The Differential Quadrature Finite Element Method,” Applied Mechanics in the Americas, D. Pamplona et al. eds., American Academy of Mechanics, 6, pp. 309-312.
5. Bellman, R. E., and Casti, J., 1971, “Differential Quadrature and Long-term Integration,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., 34, pp. 235-238.
6. Chen, C. N., 1999, “Generalization of Differential Quadrature Discrtization,” Numer. Algorithms, 22, pp. 167-182.
7. Chen, C. N., 1998, “Extended Differential Quadrature,” Applied Mechanics in the Americas, D. Pamplona et al., eds., American Academy of Mechanics, 6, pp. 309-312.
8. Chen, C. N., 1998, “A Differential Quadrature Finite Difference Method,” Proc., International Conference on Advanced Computational Methods in Engineering, Ghent, Belgium, pp. 713-720.
9. Chen, C. N., 1995, “A Differential Quadrature Element Method,” Proc., 1st International Conference on Engineering Computation and Computer Simulation, Changsha, China, 1, pp. 25-34.
10. Chen, C. N., 1998, “A Generalized Differential Quadrature Element Method,” Proc., International Conference on Advanced Computational Methods in Engineering, Ghent, Belgium, pp. 721-728.
11. Chung, J., and Hulbert, G. M., 1993, “A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics with Improved Numerical Dissipations: the Generalized-a Method,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 60, pp. 371-375.
12. Hilber, H. M. et al., 1977, “Improved Numerical Dissipation for Time Integration Algorithms in Structural Dynamics,” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 5, pp. 283-292.
13. Wood, W. L. et al., 1980, “An Alpha Modification of Newmark’s Method,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 15, pp. 1562-1566.
14. Newmark, N. M., 1959, “A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics,” Proc., ASCE, 85, EM3, pp. 67-94.
15. Hogge, M. and Ponthot, J. P., 1996, “Efficient Implicit Schemes for Transient Problems in Metal Forming Simulation,” Numerical and Physical Study of Material Forming Processes, Paris, France.
16. Cahill, E., 1992, “Acceleration Techniques for Functional Iteration of Nonlinear Equations,” IMACS Conference on Mathematical Modelling and Scientific Computing, Bangalove, India.
17. Crisfield, M. A., 1984, “Accelerated and Damping the Modified Newton-Raphson Method,” Comput. Struct., 18, pp. 267-278.
18. Chen, C. N., 1998, “Newton-Raphson Techniques in Finite Element Methods for Nonlinear Structural Problems,” International Series in Engineering, Technology and Applied Science, Structural Dynamic Systems Computational Techniques and Optimization, C. T. Leondes, eds., Gordon and Breach, pp. 149-242.
19. Saint-Georges, P., et al., 1996, “High-Performance PCG Solvers for FEM Structural Analysis,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 39, pp. 1313-1340.
20. Chen, C. N., 1995, “A Global Secant Relaxation (GSR) Method-Based Predictor-Corrector Procedure for the Iterative Solution of Finite Element Systems,” Comput. Struct., 54, pp. 199-205.
21. Stenger, F., 1981, “Numerical Methods Based on Whittaker Cardinal, or Sinc Functions,” SIAM Review, 23, pp. 165-224.