Global aging and intergenerational equity

Journal of Intergenerational Relationships

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 29-47

  Wisensale, Steven K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Intergenerational equity; International aging; World population aging

Indexed keywords

EID: 13644253767     PISSN: 15350770     EISSN: 15350932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J194v01n01_05     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. American Association of Retired Persons. 1998. Boomers approaching midlife: How secure a future? Washington, DC: Public Policy Institute. American Association of Retired Persons, May, 1998, D 166687.
2. Bass, S., R. Morris, and M. Oka. 1996. PublicPolicy and the Old Age Revolution in Japan. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
3. Binney, E. and C. Estes. 1998. The retreat of the state and its transfer of responsibility: The intergenerational war. International Journal of Health Services, 18, 83-96.
4. Binstock, R. 1983. The aged as scapegoat. The Gerontologist, 23, 136-143.
5. Borsch-Supan, A. 2001. Aging in Germany and the United States: International comparisions. NBER Working Paper no. 4530. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
6. Bosworth, B. and G. Burtless. 1998. Aging Societies: A Global Dimension. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
7. Bovenberg, L. 2001. Pension syste M.S. in aging societies. A paper presented at the Kiel Week Conference, Economic Policy for Aging Societies. Kiel: June 18-19, 2001.
8. Callahan, D. 1987. Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society. New York: Simon and Schuster.
9. Callahan, D. 1990. What Kind of Life: The Limits of Medical Progress. New York: Simon and Schuster.
10. Carvallo, J. and L. Wong. 1995. A window of opportunity: Some demographic and socioeconomic implications of the rapid fertility decline in Brazil. Belo Horizonte: UFMG/Cedeplar.
11. Chawla, S. 1993. Demographic aging and development. Generations, 17, 4, 20-23.
12. Cohen, L. 1993. Justice Across Generations: What Does it Mean? Washington, DC: Public Policy Institute, American Association of Retired Persons.
13. Coleman, J. 1997. Aging of Japan seen as bringing opportunities and probleM.S. The Seattle Times, December 11, 1997, 14.
14. Daniels, N. 1983. Justice between age groups: Am I my parents keeper? MillbankMemorial Fund Quarterly, Summer, 489-522.
15. Daniels, N. 1988. Am I My Parents’ Keeper? An Essay on Justice Between the Young and Old. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Daniels, N. 1993. The prudential lifespan account of justice across generations. In L. Cohen (ed.) Justice Across Generations: What Does it Mean? Washington, DC: Public Policy Institute, American Association of Retired Persons.
17. Dychtwald, K. 1999. Age Power: How the 21st Century Will be Ruled by the New World. New York: Putnam.
18. Faruquee, H. and M. Muhleisen. 2001. Population aging in Japan: Demographic shock and fiscal sustainability. International Monetary Fund working paper no. 01/40. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
19. Fritsch, P. 1998. Brazil’s pension system is a potential time bomb. Wall Street Journal, July 9, 1998, 1.
20. Fukuyama, F. 1999. The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. New York: Free Press.
21. Generations United. 1992. The Common Stake: The Interdependence of Generations: A Policy Framework for an Aging Society. Washington, DC: Generations United.
22. Global Aging Initiative. 2001. Global Aging Initiative 2001. Washington, DC: Center for the Strategic and International Studies.
23. Hashimoto, A. 1996. The Gift of Generations: Japanese and American Perspectives on Aging and the Social Contract. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Hudson, R. 1978. The graying of the federal budget and the consequences for old-age policy. The Gerontologist, 18, 428-440.
25. Hudson, R. 1997. The Future of Aged-Based Public Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Kingson, E. 1989. Understanding and learning from the generational equity debate. The Aging Connection, 9, October/November, 1989.
27. Kingson, E. and J. WilliaM.S.on. 1993. The generational equity debate: A progressive framing of a conservative issue. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 5, 3, 31-51.
28. Kotlikoff, L. 1992. Generational Accounting: Knowing Who Pays, When, and for What We Spend. New York: The Free Press.
29. Krauss, C. 1988. Social security, Chilean style: Pensioners quiver as markets fall. New York Times, August 16, 1998.
30. Kristof, N. 1996. Baby makes three, but in Japan that’s not enough. New YorkTimesln-ternational, October 6, 1996.
31. Kumagai, F. 1996. Unmasking Japan today: The Impact of Traditional Values on Modern Japanese Society. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
32. Lane, C. 1993. Is Europe’s social welfare state headed for the deathbed? Newsweek, August 23, 1993.
33. Lee, R. 1994. Fertility, mortality, and intergenerational transfers: Comparisons across steady states. In Ermisch, J. and N. Ogawa (Eds.) The Family, the Market, and the State in Aging Societies. New York: Clarendon, pp. 135-157.
34. Link Age 2000. 1998. Policy implications of global aging. http:lllibrary.advanced.orgl10120lcyberlextendedlpolity.html.
35. Longman, P. 1987. Born to Pay: The New Politics of Aging in America. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
36. Minkler, M. and Robertson, A. (1991). The political economy of aging. Aging and Society, 11, 1-22.
37. Moody, H. 1992. Ethics in an Aging Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Moon, M. 1993. Measuring intergenerational equity. In L. Cohen (ed.) Justice Across Nations: What Does it Mean? Washington, DC: Public Policy Institute, American Association of Retired Persons.
39. Myles, J. and J. Quadagno (Eds.). 1993. States, Labor Markets, and the Future of Old Age Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
40. Neugarten, B. 1982. Age or Need: Public Policies for Older People. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Ogawa, N. and R. Tetherford. 1997. Shifting costs for the elderly back to families in Japan: Will it work? Population and Development Review. 75-77, 87-88, 91.
42. Ogawa, N. 1999. The socioeconomic consequences of population aging in Japan. National Institute for Research Advancement Review. Washington, DC: National Institute for Research Advancement.
43. Petersen, P. 1993. Facing Up: How to Rescue the Economy from Crushing Debt and Restore the American dream. New York: Simon and Schuster.
44. Petersen, P. 1999. The Gray Dawn. New York: Times-Books.
45. Preston, S. 1984. children and the elderly in the United States. Scientific American, 250, 44-49.
46. Quadagno, J. 1990. Generational equity and the politics of the welfare state. International Journal of Health Services,20, 4, 631-649.
47. Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Richman, H. and M. Stagner. 1985. children in an aging society: Treasured resource or forgotten minority? Daedalus, 115, 171-189.
49. Roszak, T. 1998. America the Wise: The Longevity Revolution and the True Wealth of Nations. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
50. Safe-Sanchez, X. 1997. Economic growth and distributive inequality in the process of democratization: A critical analysis of social development. A paper presented at the 20th International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Guadalajara, Mexico.
51. Schemo, D. 1998. Brazilians scale back pledges to cut budget. New York Times, November 12, 1998.
52. Schulz, J. 1993. And then chicken little cried, “the sky is falling.” Generations, 17, 4, 5-6.
53. The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. 1997. Germany’s Social Insecurity: The Twin Challenges of unemployment and the Future of the German Public Pension System. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. http:lljhuniverse.hcf.edulaicgsdoclaicgsleventslpass.htm.
54. United Nations. 1982. International Plan of Action on Aging. Vienna and New York: United Nations.
55. United Nations. 1985a. The World Aging Situation: Strategies and Policies. New York: United Nations.
56. United Nations. 1985b. First Review and Appraisal of the Implementation of the International Plan of Action on Aging. Report of the Secretary General. New York: United Nations.
57. United Nations. 1989. Second Review and Appraisal of the Implementation of the International Plan of Action on Aging. Report of the Secretary General. United Nations.
58. United Nations. 1990a. World Population Prospects, 1990. New York: United Nations.
59. United Nations. 1990b. The Sex and Age Distribution of the World’s Population: The 1990 Revision. New York: United Nations.
60. United Nations. 1991. The World Aging Situation. New York: United Nations.
61. United Nations. 1993. Third Review and Appraisal of the Implementation of the International Plan of Action on Aging. New York: United Nations.
62. United Nations. 2000. The Ageing of the World’s Population. Division for Social Policy and Development, United Nations. New York: United Nations.
63. U.S. Census Bureau and the National Institute on Aging. (2001). An Aging World: 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau and the National Institute on Aging.
64. Wallace, P. 1999. Agequake: Riding the Demographic Roller Coaster Shaping Business, Finance, and Our World. New York: Nicolas Brealey.
65. WilliaM.S.on, J. and G. Hochman 1995. Innovative old-age security models for developing nations: Chile and Brazil. Journal of Aging Studies, 9, 3, 245-262.
66. WilliaM.S.on, J., D. Watts-Roy, and E. Kingson. 1999. The Generational Equity Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
67. World Bank Policy Research Report. 1997. Averting the old-age crisis: Policies to protect The old and promote growth. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://library.advanced.orgl10120lcyberlextendedlalt_Financing.html.