What Can Computers and AES Contribute to a K-12 Writing Program?

Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 3-18

  Myers, Miles ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13544250844     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410606860-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Applebee, A.N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
2. Apple bee, A.N. (1986). Problems in proces s approache s: Toward a reconceptualization of process approaches. In D.Bartholomae (Ed.), The teaching of writing (Vol. 85 th Yearbook, p. 95-113).
3. Bagley, W. (1921). Dangers and difficulties of the project method and how to overcome them:Projects and purposes in teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 22(4), 288-297.
4. Becker, G.S. (1964). Human capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Britton, J.N., and Pradl, G.M. (1982). Prospect and retrospect: Selected essays of James Britton. Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
6. Brown, J.S., and Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Bruffee, K. (1984). Collaborative learning and the conversation of mankind. College English, 46, 635-652.
8. Bruner, J., Jolly, A., and Sylva, K. (Ed.). (1976). Play, its role in development and evolution. New York: Basic Books.
9. Christensen, F., and Christensen, B. (1978). Notes toward a new rhetoric: Nine essays for teachers (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
10. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., and Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B.Resnick (Ed.), Knowing learning and instruction:Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Cremin, L. (1965). The transformation of the school: Progressivism, in American education, 1876-1957. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Diederich, P. (1974). Measuring growth in English. Urbana, IL: National Council on Teachers of English.
14. Emig, J. (1971). The composing process of twelth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council on Teachers of English.
15. Gardner, D. (1983). Nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
16. Godshalk, F., Swineford, F., and Coffman, W. (1966). The measurement of writing ability. New York: College Board.
17. Herrington, A., and Moran, C. (2001). What happens when machines read our students writing? College English, 63, 480-499.
18. Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL:National Council of Teachers of English.
19. Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: how state writing assessments control learning. New York City, NY: Teachers College Press.
20. Hirsch, E.D. (2000). The tests we need. 2001 Editorial Projects in Education (Education Week), 19, 1-9.
21. Jackendoff, R (1992). Language of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Kay, A. (2000). Keynote. Paper presented at New Directions in Student Testing and Technology, APEC 2000 International Conference. University of California, Los Angeles.
23. Kinneavy. (1971). Theory of discourse. Engle wood Cliffs, NJ: Prenctice Hall.
24. Koretz, D., McCaffrey, D.F., and Hamilton, L.S. (2001). Toward a framework for validating gains under high stakes conditions. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Seattle.
25. Larson, M.S. (1977). The rise of professionalism. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
26. Linn, R.L., Baker, E.L., and Dunbar, S.B. (1991). Complex performance-based assessment expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21.
27. Linn, R L., Baker, E. (2000). Assessment challenges-Technology. solutions. Paper presented at the APEC Conference. University of California, Los Angeles.
28. Mazo, K.K. (2001). Panel urges study of reading comprehension. 2001 Editorial Projects in Education (Education Week), 1-3.
29. Mathews, J. (2001). Trying to clear up the confusion. The Washington Post, A6.
30. Moffett, J. (1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31. Moffett, J. (Ed.) (1973). Interaction: A student-centered language arts and reading program. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
32. Myers, C. (1967). Learning is child’s play: The vision of circle preschool. Oakland, CA: Circle Pre-School, Alpha Plus Corporation.
33. Myers, G. (1986). Reality, consensus, and reform in the rhetoric of composition teaching. College English, 48, 154-171.
34. Myers, M. (1996). Changing our minds: Negotiating English and literacy. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
35. Myers, M., and Spain, A. (2001). Report of the conference chairs on the Asilomar Conference on testing and accountability. Paper presented at the Asilomar Testing and Accountability Conference, Asilomar, CA.
36. NAEP (1998). The 1998 NAEP writing report card. Washington, DC: National Assessment of Eduational Progress. U.S. Department of Education and the National Assessment Governing Board.
37. National Council of Teachers of English and the International Reading Association. (1995). Standards for English language arts (draft). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
38. National Council of Teachers of English and the International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for English language arts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
39. Ong, W, (1982). Orality and literacy. New York: Methuen.
40. Page, E., and Paulus, D. (1968). The anlaysis of essays by computer. Sorrs, CT: University of Connecticut, ERIC, and the U.S. Office of Education.
41. Perl, S. (1980). A look at basic writers in the process of composing basic writing: A collection of essays for teachers, researchers, and administrators. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
42. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
43. Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back. New York: Simon and Schuster.
44. Reich, R. (1992). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. New York:Vintage.
45. Resnick, L.B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46. Resnick, L. B, and Resnick, D.P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tolls for educational reform. Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 9-35). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
47. RRSG. (2001). Reading for understanding: Towards an RandD program in reading comprehension. RAND Reading Study Group, OERI, U.S. Department of Education.
48. Scholes, R. (1985). Textual power: Literacy theory and the teaching of English. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
49. Shavelson, R.J., Gao, X., and Baxter, G.P. (1993). Sampling variability of performance assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 215-232.
50. Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
51. Shulman, L. (1999). Foreword. In G. Hillocks (Ed.), Ways of thinking ways of teaching (pp. vii-x). New York: Teachers College Press.
52. Smith, M. (2000). Using data for multiple purposes. Paper presented at the New Directions in Student Testing and Technology, APEC 2000 International Assessment Conference, University of California, Los Angeles.
53. Starch, D., and Elliott, E.C. (1912). Reliability of grading high school work in English. School Review, 21, 442-451.
54. Stigler, J., and Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: Free Press.
55. Strong, W. (1973). Sentence combining. A composing book. New York: Random House.
56. Taylor, B.A.P., Poth, J., and Portman D.J. (1995). Teaching physics with toys: Activities for grades K-9. New York: Terrific Science Press.
57. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Whitford, B. L., and Jones, K. (Eds.) (2000). Accontabitity assessment, and teacher commitment:Lessons from Kentucky’s reform efforts. Albany: State University of New York Press.