Using latent class analysis to detect behavioral patterns in systems of observational variables

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 321-331

  Weßels, Holger ^a   Von Eye, Alexander ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13544250096     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7189(96)00030-4     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. AKAIKE, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B.N. Petrov, & B.F. Csaki (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267-281). Academia Kiado: Budapest.
2. ALBA, R.D. (1988). Interpreting the parameters of log-linear models. In J.S. Long (Ed.), Common problems - proper solutions (pp. 258-287). Newbury Park: Sage.
3. ALLISON, P.D., & LIKER, J.K. (1982). Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction: A comment on Gottman. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 393-403.
4. ANDERSEN, E.B. (1982). Latent structure analysis - a survey. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 9, 1-12.
5. BARTHOLOMEW, D.J. (1987). Latent variable models and factor analysis, London: Griffin.
6. BISHOP, Y.M.M., FIENBERG, S.E., & HOLLAND, P.W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Theory and practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. BOZDOGAN, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extension. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
8. BROBERG, A., LAMB, M.E., & HWANG, P. (1990). Inhibition: Its stability and correlates in 16- to 40-month-old children. Child Development, 61, 1153-1163.
9. BUDESCU, D.V. (1984). Tests of lagged dominance in sequential dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 564-583.
10. COLLINS, L.M., FIDLER, P.L., WUGALTER, S.E., & LONG, J.D. (1993). Goodness-of-fit-testing for Latent Class Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 375-389.
11. COLLINS, L.M., FIDLER, P.L., & WUGALTER, S.E. (in press). Some practical issues related to estimation of Latent Class and Latent Transition parameters. In A. von Eye, & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Analysis of categorical variables in developmental research. Boston: Academic Press.
12. DEMPSTER, A.P., LAIRD, N.M., & RUBIN, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM-algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Scries B, 39, 1-22.
13. ELLIOTT, G.C. (1988). Interpreting higher order interactions in log-linear analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 121-130.
14. FORMANN, A. (1980). Neuere Verfahren der Parameterschätzung in der Latent Class Analyse. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 107-116.
15. GOODMAN, L.A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215-231.
16. GOTTMAN, J.M. (1979). Detecting cyclicity in social interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 338-348.
17. HABERMAN, S.J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data. Vol. 1: Introductory topics. New York: Academic Press.
18. HABERMAN, S.J. (1979). Analysis of qualitative data. Vol. 2: New developments. New York: Academic Press.
19. HOWES, C. (1980). Peer play scales as an index of complexity of peer interaction. Developmental Psychology, 16, 371-372.
20. HWANG, C.P., LAMB, M.E., & BROBERG, A. (1989). The development of social and intellectual competence in Swedish preschoolers raised at home and in out-of-home care facilities. In K. Kreppner, & M.E. Lerner (Eds.), Family systems and life-span development (pp. 105-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. IACOBUCCI, D., & WASSERMAN, S. (1988). A general framework for the statistical analysis of sequential dyadic interaction data. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 379-390.
22. ISABELLA, R.A., & BELSKY, J. (1991). Interactional synchronicity and the origins of infant-mother attachment: a replication study. Child Development, 62, 373-384.
23. KREPPNER, K., PAULSEN, S., & SCHÜTZE, Y. (1982). Infant and family development: from triads to tetrads. Human Development, 25, 373-391.
24. LAMB, M.E., HWANG, C.P., BOOKSTEIN, F.L., BROBERG, A., HULT, G., & FRODI, M. (1988). Determinants of social competence in Swedish preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 24, 58-70.
25. LAMB, M.E., HWANG, C.P., BROBERG, A., & BOOKSTEIN, F.L. (1988). The effects of out-of-home care on the development of social competence in Sweden: A longitudinal study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 3, 379-402.
26. LAMB, M.E., STERNBERG, K.J., KNUTH, N., HWANG, C.P., & BROBERG, A.G. (1994). Peer play and nonparental care experience. In H. Goelman, & E.V. Jacobs (Eds.), Children's play in childcare settings (pp. 37-52). Albany: State University of New York Press.
27. LANGEHEINE, R. (1988). Manifest and latent Markov chain models for categorical panel data. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13, 299-312.
28. LANGEHEINE, R. (1994). Latent variables Markov models. In A. von Eye. & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analyses. Applications for developmental research (pp. 373-395). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. LANGEHEINE, R., & VAN DE POL, F. (1990). A unifying framework for Markov modeling in discrete space and discrete time. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 416-441.
30. LAZARSFELD, P.F. (1950). Logical and mathematical foundations of latent structure analysis. In S.A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E.A. Suchman, P.F. Lazarsfeld, S.A. Star, & J.A. Clausen (Eds.), Studies in social psychology in world war II, Vol. IV. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
31. LAZARSFELD, P.F. (1968). Latent structure analysis, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
32. MUELLER, E., & BRENNER, J. (1977). The origins of social skills and interaction among playgroup toddlers. Child Development, 48, 854-861.
33. MUELLER, E., & LUKAS, T. (1975). A developmental analysis of peer interaction among toddlers. In M. Lewis, & L.A. Rosenblum (Eds.), Friendship and peer relations. New York: Wiley.
34. MOLENAAR, P.C.M., & VON EYE, A. (1994). On the arbitrary nature of latent variables. In A. von Eye, & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Analysis of categorical variables in developmental research (pp. 226-242). Newbury Park: Sage.
35. RINDSKOPF, D. (1987). Using latent class models to test developmental models. Developmental Review, 7, 66-85.
36. RINDSKOPF, D. (1990). Testing developmental models using latent class analysis. In A. von Eye (Ed.), Statistical methods in longitudinal research, vol. II: Time series and categorical longitudinal data (pp. 443-469). San Diego: Academic Press.
37. ROST, J. (1988). Qualitative und quantitative probabilistische Testtheorie. Bern: Huber.
38. ROST, J. (1990). LACORD. Latent class analysis for ordinal variables. User manual. Kiel, Germany: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN).
39. ROST, J., & GEORG, W. (1991). Alternative Skalierungsmöglichkeiten zur klassischen Testtheorie am Beispiel der Skala "Jugendzentrismus". Zuma-Information, 28, 52-75.
40. SACKETT, G.P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. Osojsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 623-649). New York: Wiley.
41. SCHÖLMERICH, A., FRACASSO, M.P., LAMB, M.E., & BROBERG, A.G. (in press). Interactional harmony at 7 and 10 months of age predicts security of attachment as measured by Q-sort ratings. Social Development.
42. SMITH, L.M., PRUNTY, J.P., DWYER, D.C., & KLEINE, P.F. (1987). The fate of an innovative school. Philadelphia: Falmer.
43. VAN DE POL, F., & LANGEHEINE, R. (1989). Mixed Markov models, mover-stayer models and the EM algorithm. With an application to labour market data from the Netherlands Socio Economic Panel. In R. Coppi, & S. Bolasco (Eds.), Multiway data analysis (pp. 485-495). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
44. VAN DE POL, F. & LANGEHEINE, R. (1990). Mixed Markov Latent Class models. In. C.C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1990 (pp. 213-247). Oxford: Blackwell.
45. VON EYE, A., KREPPNER, K., & WEßELS, H. (1992). Differential change in systems of categorical variables. In J.B. Asendorpf, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Stability and change in development. A study of methodological reasoning (pp. 21-53). Newbury Park: Sage.
46. VON EYE, A., KREPPNER, K., & WEßELS, H. (1994). Log-linear modeling of categorical data in developmental research. In D.L. Featherman, R.M. Lerner, & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior, Vol. 12 (pp. 225-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. WICKENS, T.D. (1993). Analysis of contingency tables with between-subjects variability. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 191-204.
48. WICKENS, T.D. (1989). Multiway contingent tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.