Developing concurrent investment plans for power generation and transmission

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 166, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 449-468

  Küçükyazici, Beste ^a   Özdamar, Linet ^b,c   Pokharel, Shaligram ^b  

^a YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c Ak Teknik Makina San Ve Tic As   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Energy; Investment analysis; Power generation and transmission

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; INVESTMENTS; PLANNING; PUBLIC POLICY;

ENERGY; INVESTMENT ANALYSIS; NETWORK DESIGN; POWER GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION;

ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION;

EID: 13544249630     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.019     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amiri A., Pirkul H. Routing and capacity assignment in backbone communication networks. Computers and Operations Research. 24(3):1997;275-287
2. Bahiense L., Oliveira G.C., Pereira M., Granville S. A mixed integer disjunctive model for transmission network expansion. IEEE on Power Systems. 16:2001;560-565
3. Batut J., Renaud A. Daily generation scheduling optimization with transmission constraints: A new class of algorithms. IEEE on Power Systems. 7:1992;982-987
4. Bousba C., Wolsey L. Finding minimum cost directed trees with demands and capacities. Annals of Operations Research. 33:1991;285-303
5. Castillo L., Gonzales A. Distribution network optimization: Finding the most economical solution by using the genetic algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research. 108:1998;527-537
6. Chatuverdi R., Bhattacharya K., Parikh J. Transmission planning for Indian power grid: A mixed integer programming approach. International Transactions in Operational Research. 6:1999;465-482
7. Church R.L. Geographical information systems and location science. Computers and Operations Research. 29:2002;541-562
8. EC Directorate General Energy and Transport, 2001. Analysis of electricity network capacities and identification of congestion, RWTH Aachen, commissioned by EC Directorate General Energy and Transport, Aachen
9. Eynon, R.T., Leckey, T.J., Hale, D.R., 2000. The electric transmission network: A multi-region analysis. Energy Information Administration/Issues in Midterm Analysis and Forecasting, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
10. Frantzeskakis L.F., Luss H. The network redesign problem for access telecommunications networks. Naval Research Logistics. 46:1999;487-506
11. Gallegro R.A., Romero R., Monticelli A.J. Tabu search algorithm for network synthesis. IEEE on Power Systems. 15:2000;490-495
12. Gendreau, M., Labbe, M., Wynants, C., 2000. Network synthesis with non-simultaneous single commodity flow requirements, Centre de Recherche sur les Transports, University of Montreal, 2000
13. Gil H.A., da Silva E.L. A reliable approach for solving the transmission network expansion planning problem using genetic algorithms. Electric Power Systems Research. 58:2001;45-51
14. Gupta R., Pirkul H. Hybrid fiber co-axial CATV network design with variable capacity optical network units. European Journal of Operational Research. 123:2000;73-83
15. Hewlett, J.G., Hale, D.R., Luong, T., Eynon, R.T., 1998. An exploration of network modeling: The case of NEPOOL. Energy Information Administration/ Issues in Midterm Analysis and Forecasting, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
16. Hirst E., Kirby B. Transmission Planning for a Restructuring US Electric Industry. 2001;Edison Electric Institute, Washington, DC
17. Iwayemi A. An investment planning model for the electricity sector in Nigeria. Socio-Economic Planning Science. 12:1978;285-292
18. Mateus G.R., Thizy J.M. Exact sequential choice of locations in a network. Annals of OR. 86:1999;199-219
19. Melkote S., Daskin M.S. Capacitated facility location/network design problems. European Journal of Operational Research. 129:2001;481-495
20. Rajamaran R., Sarlashkar J.V., Alvarado F.L. The effect of demand elasticity on security prices for the POOLCO and multi-lateral contract models. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 12(3):1997;1177-1184
21. Romero R., Monticelli A. A hierarchical decomposition approach for transmission expansion planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 9:1994;373-380
22. Ruzic S., Rajakovic N. A new approach for extended unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 6:1991;269-277
23. Sahin V. Regional Turkish Electrical Energy Demand 1990-2010. 1997;Turkish Electricity Agency, Ankara
24. Tsamasphysrou, P., Renaud, A., Carpentier, P., 1999. Transmission network planning: An efficient Benders' decomposition scheme. In: Proceedings of the 13th PSCC, pp. 487-494
25. Turkish Electric Agency, Medium and long-range electrical energy production planning report (in Turkish). Turkish Electric Agency, Ankara, 1997
26. US Department of Energy, Annual energy outlook 1997. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, DOE/EIA-0383(97), 1996
27. US EMM, US electricity market module of the national energy modeling system. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-M068, Washington, DC, 2001
28. Wang S.J., Shahidehpair S.M., Kirschen D.S., Mokhtari S., Irisarri G.D. Short term generation scheduling with transmission and environmental constraints using an augmented Lagrangean relaxation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 10(3):1995;1294-1301