Effects of fentanyl on emergence characteristics from anesthesia in adult cervical spine surgery: A comparison of fentanyl-based and sevoflurane-based anesthesia

Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 12-16

  Inoue, Yoshitaka ^a   Koga, Kazunori ^b   Sata, Takeyoshi ^b   Shigematsu, Akio ^c  

^a SPINAL INJURIES CENTER   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anesthesia regimen; Cervical spine surgery; Fentanyl; Quality of emergence

Indexed keywords

ATROPINE; FENTANYL; FLURBIPROFEN AXETIL; HYDROXYZINE; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE; VECURONIUM;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; ARTICLE; ATLANTOAXIAL SUBLUXATION; AWARENESS; CERVICAL SPINE; CERVICAL SPINE DISLOCATION; CERVICAL SPINE INJURY; CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS; CERVICOBRACHIAL NEURALGIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; JOINT MOBILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; NECK; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NOCICEPTION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYRINGOMYELIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FENTANYL; HUMANS; MALE; METHYL ETHERS; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINE;

EID: 13444301574     PISSN: 09138668     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-004-0278-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Beskow A, Westrin P (1999) Sevoflurane causes more postoperative agitation in children than dose halothane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:536-541
2. Wells LT, Rasch DK (1999) Emergence "delirium" after sevoflurane anesthesia: A paranoid delusion? Anesth Analg 88: 1308-1310
3. Uezono S, Goto T, Terui K, Ichinose F, Ishguro Y, Nakata Y, Morita S (2000) Emergence agitation after sevoflurane versus propofol in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 91:563-566
4. Cohen IT, Hannallah RS, Hummer KA (2001) The incidence of emergence agitation associated with desflurane anesthesia in children is reduced by fentanyl. Anesth Analg 93:88-91
5. McLeskey CH, Walawander CA, Nahrwold ML, Roizen MF, Stanley TH, Thisted RA, White PF, Apfelbaum JL, Grasela TH, Hug CC Jr (1993) Adverse events in a multicenter phase IV study of propofol: Evaluation by anesthesiologists and postanesthesia care unit nurses. Anesth Analg 77:S3-S9
6. White M, Kenny GN (1990) Intravenous propofol anaesthesia using a computerised infusion system. Anaesthesia 45:204-209
7. Russell D, Wilkes MP, Hunter SC, Glen JB, Hutton P, Kenny GN (1995) Manual compared with target-controlled infusion of propofol. Br J Anaesth 75:562-566
8. Vuyk J, Mertens MJ, Olofsen E, Burm AG, Bovill JG (1997) Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection: Determination of optimal EC50-EC95 propofol-opioid concentrations that assure adequate anesthesia and a rapid return of consciousness. Anesthesiology 87:1549-1562
9. Tang J, Chen L, White PF, Watcha, MF, Wender RH, Naruse R, Kariger R, Sloninsky A (1999) Recovery profile, costs, and patient satisfaction with propofol and sevoflurane for fast-track office-based anesthesia. Anesthesiology 91:253-261
10. Gan TJ, Glass PS, Windsor A, Payne F, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P (1997) Bispectral index monitoring allows faster emergence and improved recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. BIS Utility Study Group. Anesthesiology 87:808-815
11. Theodorou T, Hales P, Gillespie P, Robertson B (2001) Total intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for colonoscopy: A prospective study of clinical recovery and psychomotor function. Anaesth Intens Care 29:124-136
12. Coloma M, Zhou T, White PF, Markowitz SD, Forestner JE (2001) Fast-tracking after outpatient laparoscopy: Reasons for failure after propofol, sevoflurane, and desflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 93:112-115
13. Daniel M, Weiskopf RB, Noorani M, Eger EI II (1998) Fentanyl augments the blockade of the sympathetic response to incision (MAC-BAR) produced by desflurane and isoflurane: Desflurane and isoflurane MAC-BAR without and with fentanyl. Anesthesiology 88:43-49
14. Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K (1997) Reduction by fentanyl of the Cp50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxious stimuli. Anesthesiology 87:213-227
15. Tramer M, Moore A, McQuay H (1997) Meta-analytic comparison of prophylactic antiemetic efficacy for postoperative nausea and vomiting: propofol anaesthesia vs omitting nitrous oxide vs total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol. Br J Anaesth 78:256-259
16. Guy J, Hindman BJ, Baker KZ, Borel CO, Maktabi M, Ostapkovich N, Kirchner J, Todd MM, Fogarty-Mack P, Yancy V, Sokoll MD, McAllister A, Roland C, Young WL, Warner DS (1997) Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions. Anesthesiology 86:514-524
17. Balakrishnan G, Raudzens P, Samra SK, Song K, Boening JA, Bosek V, Jamerson BD, Warner DS (2000) A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesions. Anesth Analg 91:163-169
18. Venn RM, Grounds RM (2001) Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit: Patient and clinician perceptions. Br J Anaesth 87:684-690