Finding support for educational projects in anatomy: Tips, tools, and lessons learned

Anatomical Record - Part B New Anatomist

Volumn 282, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 13-17

  Granger, Noelle A ^a,b   Calleson, Diane ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Education; Funding; Grant writing; Institutional review board; Multi site projects; Research

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GROUP DYNAMICS; INTERNET; MEDICAL SOCIETY; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYMPOSIUM; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

ANATOMY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; RESEARCH SUPPORT; TEACHING; TRAINING SUPPORT; WRITING;

EID: 13444294288     PISSN: 0003276X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ar.b.20045     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Cottam WW. 1999. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat 12:55-65.
2. Fitzharris TP. 1998. Survey of gross anatomy courses in the United States and Canada. Anat Rec (New Anat) 253:162-166.
3. Marks SC Jr. 1996. Information technology, medical education and anatomy for s the twenty-first century. Clin Anat 9:343-349.
4. Parker LM. 2002 Anatomical dissection: why are we cutting it out? Dissection in undergraduate teaching. ANZ J Surg 72:910-912.
5. Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE. 1994. Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.