Accepting conflict and experiencing creativity: Teaching "Concertation" using la Francilienne CD-ROM

Negotiation Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 85-103

  De Carlo, Laurence ^a  

^a ESSEC BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13444274717     PISSN: 07484526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00048.x     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Amado, G. and A. Ambrose, (eds). 2001. The transitional approach to change. London and New York: Karnac Books.
2. Amado, G. and R. Amato. 2001. Some distinctive characteristics of transitional change. In The transitional approach to change, edited by G. Amado and A. Ambrose. London and New York: Karnac Books.
3. Argyris, C. and D. Schön. 1978. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. _. 1996. Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley series.
5. Boltanski, L. and L. Thévenot. 1991. De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur, Paris: nrf Gallimard.
6. de Carlo, L. 1996. Gestion de la ville et démocratie locale, Paris and Montréal: L'Harmattan.
7. Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
8. Fisher, R., W. Ury and B. Patton. 1991. Getting to Yes. London: Arrow Business Books.
9. Kaës, R., D. Anzieu and L. V. Thomas. 1997. Fantasme et formation. Paris: Editions Dunod.
10. Kisfalvi, V. 1993. The creation of a "safe place" in the classroom: An essential requirement for case method teaching. In Innovation through cooperation -with cases, simulations, games and other interactive methods, edited by H. E. Klein. Boston: WACRA.
11. Lax, D. and J. Sebenius. 1995. Les gestionnaires et la négociation, Paris: Gaétan Morin.
12. Lempereur, A. 1998. Les étapes du processus de conciliation. Document de recherche. Paris-Cergy: Centre de Recherche ESSEC.
13. Lewin, K. 1951. Field theory in social sciences. New York: Harper and Row.
14. Mnookin, R. 1997. Surmonter les obstacles dans la résolution de conflits. Document de recherche. Paris-Cergy: Centre de Recherche ESSEC.
15. Salzer, J. and A. Stimec. 1995-1996. Introduction à la gestion des conflits. Polycopié de l'UV 106. Paris: Université de Paris-Dauphine.
16. Schön, D. 1991. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. England: Arena.
17. Simmel, G. 1992. Le conflit. Saulxures, France: Circé.
18. Simon, H. A. 1974. La science des systèmes: Science de l'artificiel. Paris: Epi S.A. Editeurs.
19. Six, J. F. 1990. Le temps des médiateurs. Paris: Seuil.
20. Susskind, L. and P. Field. 1996. Dealing with an angry public: The mutual gains approach to resolving disputes. New York: The Free Press.
21. Susskind, L. and J. Coburn. 2000. Using simulations to teach negotiation: Pedagogical theory and practice. In Teaching negotiation: Ideas and innovations, edited by M. Wheeler. Cambridge, MA: PON Books.
22. Winnicott, D. W. 1986. Home is where we start from. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.
23. _.2001. Playing and reality. Hove, East Sussex and Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.