Formal characterization and extension of the linearized diffusion tensor model

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 144-155

  Salvador, Raymond ^a,c   Peña, Alonso ^b   Menon, David K ^a   Carpenter, T Adrian ^a   Pickard, John D ^a,b   Bullmore, Ed T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Confidence interval; Diffusivity; DTI; FDR; Goodness of fit; Rician distribution

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BRAIN CONTUSION; BRAIN INJURY; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; HUMAN; HYDROCEPHALUS; MALE; MODEL; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RICIAN DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN EDEMA; BRAIN INJURIES; BRAIN MAPPING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; HYDROCEPHALUS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 13444270481     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20076     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alexander DC, Barker GJ, Arridge SR (2002): Detection and modeling of non-gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data. Magn Reson Med 48:331-340.
2. Anderson AW (2001): Theoretical analysis of the effects of noise on diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 46:1174-1188.
3. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D (1994): Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B 103:247-254.
4. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C (1996): Microstructural arid physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 111:209-219.
5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995): Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B 57:239-300.
6. Benjamini Y, Yekuteli D (2001): The control of the fabe discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Statist 29:1165-1188.
7. Christensen R (1996): Plane answers to complex questions: the theory of linear models. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag. 468 p.
8. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T (2002): Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 15:870-878.
9. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thomson MR, Venkatesan R (1999): Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: Wiley. 914 p.
10. Pajevic S, Basser PJ (2003): Parametric and non-parametric statistical analysis of DT-MRI data. J Magn Reson 161:1-14.
11. Pajevic S, Pierpaoli C (1999): Color schemes to represent the orientation of anisotropic tissues from diffusion tensor data: application to white matter fiber tract mapping in the human brain. Magn Reson Med 42:526-540.
12. Papadakis NG, Xing D, Huang CL-H, Hall LD, Carpenter TA (1999): A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. J Magn Reson 137:67-82.
13. Rawlings JO, Pantula SG, Dickey DA (1998): Applied regression analysis: a research tool. New York: Springer.
14. Rice SO (1944): Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell Syst Technol J 23:282-332.
15. Sijbers J, den Dekker AJ, Scheunders P, Van Dyck D (1998): Maximum-likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters. IEEE Trans Med Imag 17:357-361.
16. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE (1965): Spin diffusion measurements: Spin-echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 42:288-292.